|
|
18 Jun 2017, 02:45
|
#251
|
Anarchy Shadow
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nafferton, England
Posts: 324
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
As I see it the top three alliances are in a mexican standoff where if they hit each other right now they only get themselves into trouble. Outside of that, BF and Ult are generally opposed to Apprime, so you would expect them to be getting hit. Obviously Apprime look to have a rather large block and the best military force, but I'm sure KittenZ and p3nguins have that all in hand for later on.
|
er Kittenz and Peng just went to war bud but gotcha was kinda mexican standoff i guess
ateityje turi daug takai
__________________
EX
Legion, Fury, Xanadu, Wolfpack, NoS, TSU, LKSAB, Vgn, F-Crew, CT, Insomnia, Angels, VsN, Gross, Osiris, ROCK, XvX, Faceless, Unsullied, Haven, Carisan, RaGe, Carnage, Kittenz and EC
Currently
In ODDR Command
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 04:11
|
#252
|
Error
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 359
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
ok, lets just rephrase it saying even before round start the friendship between ult and bf was known by everyone who plays pa...
and seriously, if both tags was planning to do not DC, the best move to troll apprime was being their friends, and letting other guys come farm your roids...
anyway, im just having some fun trolling forums haha
xoxo
__________________
#braSilFTW
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 04:54
|
#253
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 95
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph
ok, lets just rephrase it saying even before round start the friendship between ult and bf was known by everyone who plays pa...
and seriously, if both tags was planning to do not DC, the best move to troll apprime was being their friends, and letting other guys come farm your roids...
anyway, im just having some fun trolling forums haha
xoxo
|
No that's not even true lol
I had talk to Cardi pre-round and I favoured siding with Apprime because I thought a friendship with ultores was a dangerous move considering the round that just had happened. He offered us a deal which we didn't take in the end but offer back a NAP which wasn't long enough to Cardi and wouldn't take any other deals since. I even offered him support against Ult if he couldn't do it alone, to a limited, non-retarded extent. It was unclear how strong Ult would be this round.
He just shut down the door and then every other allies did as well. We didn't NAP Ult then before t200 or so when we were left with no other options.
That said, it's always a pleasure to work with Ult but we knew ending on their side willingly or not, it would be a pretty bad round for us.
Chimpie will confirm that I never went to him pre-round or early in the round I'm sure.
__________________
-Kheros
CpV, Xanadu, FAnG, Faceless, Ultores
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 07:13
|
#254
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
"When you have no basis for an argument, emote two bananas at the plaintiff"
- Cicero
|
It was so much bs that whole text, that it didn't deserve nothing but two bananas.
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 12:34
|
#255
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demort
er Kittenz and Peng just went to war bud but gotcha was kinda mexican standoff i guess
ateityje turi daug takai
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
if they hit each other right now they only get themselves into trouble.
|
May you live in interesting times
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 12:35
|
#256
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
It was so much bs that whole text, that it didn't deserve nothing but two bananas.
|
Nah, two bananas is only worthy of derision on this forum. You just came on this thread and went "vendetta!!!!!" and then didn't back it up.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 13:51
|
#257
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
Nah, two bananas is only worthy of derision on this forum. You just came on this thread and went "vendetta!!!!!" and then didn't back it up.
|
Attacking KittenZ whole round from tick 24 forward without a valid reason and not doing very well with it sounds pretty much like personal vendetta. One is still #1 and the otherone is shrinking down.
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 13:55
|
#258
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
Attacking KittenZ whole round from tick 24 forward without a valid reason and not doing very well with it sounds pretty much like personal vendetta. One is still #1 and the otherone is shrinking down.
|
Not necessarily. And it's unlikely you will finish #1 either. Quite enjoyed this from Butch3r (despite his reputation on here, he occasionally makes some good points):
Quote:
We have been gal raiding the entire round more or less. Getting incs while you are the top tag is part of the game, if you cant deal with that perhaps you should consider joining HR, VGN, ND or some other tag?
|
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 16:09
|
#259
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
Attacking KittenZ whole round from tick 24 forward without a valid reason and not doing very well with it sounds pretty much like personal vendetta. One is still #1 and the otherone is shrinking down.
|
KittenZ was the only alliance that rushed ships, and didnt have any xans.
I heard someone saying that "VGN and BowS picked a strat to counter us" over there in kittenz? Maybe that your forts was open to our incs was the initial reason why they would be more likely to get incs compared to xan/zik heavy forts?
Also seeing you rushed ships, means you were our top hostile by far the entire round.
Yet you expect us to go hit planets that dosnt have any roids, and hadnt attacked us?
What is a valid reason for you if it aint roids or hostile fleet recieved?
Its you choice what-so-ever to take it as "its a personal vendetta", and decide to keep launching ships at us instead of attacking the biggest tags in your close proximity, and hope someone else would attack us and catch our attention.
Im pretty sure CT said the same to BF, why hit us if you can hit those that you are fighting against for ranks?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 16:32
|
#260
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
Not necessarily. And it's unlikely you will finish #1 either. Quite enjoyed this from Butch3r (despite his reputation on here, he occasionally makes some good points):
|
Who wouldn't enjoy a competing alliance to receive daily incoming, that ties some fleets to cover it? I wish the very same for all of u I still how ever fail to see any good reason on damaging his own alliance with it. When there are no real gains, nor universal political reasons for it, as you stated KittenZ is only #1 on scoreboard, they are behind both p3ng and Apprime on value and roids too.
It is either #1 vendetta or #2 block reason, which everyone tries to deny with best of their abilities.
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
Last edited by Ave; 18 Jun 2017 at 16:45.
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 16:44
|
#261
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
KittenZ was the only alliance that rushed ships, and didnt have any xans.
I heard someone saying that "VGN and BowS picked a strat to counter us" over there in kittenz? Maybe that your forts was open to our incs was the initial reason why they would be more likely to get incs compared to xan/zik heavy forts?
Also seeing you rushed ships, means you were our top hostile by far the entire round.
Yet you expect us to go hit planets that dosnt have any roids, and hadnt attacked us?
What is a valid reason for you if it aint roids or hostile fleet recieved?
Its you choice what-so-ever to take it as "its a personal vendetta", and decide to keep launching ships at us instead of attacking the biggest tags in your close proximity, and hope someone else would attack us and catch our attention.
Im pretty sure CT said the same to BF, why hit us if you can hit those that you are fighting against for ranks?
|
KittenZ hit on randomly picked gals for early roids. There is no aim for Bows or anyone else particular. There were more early attackers than I expected btw. So I assume unless u had traded some early coords, u received other incs too
Also only you seem to take it personal And on what stage when you werent gaining roids and loosing ranks u still kept KittenZ as a best possible target out there? :P
You could just admit the obvious.
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 17:12
|
#262
|
Addicted since R17
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 141
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
What amuses me butcher is i bet you actually believe that lies you make up, on another funny issue with you is how u moan that we war you after the constant incs, we give you a break stupidly, and after we decide to hit #2 alliance you join with other cowards bf in backing up p3n.
__________________
h-a = CT = h-a = Vision = ODDR = Apprime = ODDR = xVx = h-a = xVx = ODDR -Ult -Rock--Fang-HODORS-ODDR-ND-Kittenz-Carisian-Vgn-Tal Shiar-CaRn-ODDR
Best finish's 15, 17, 18, 25, 27, 27, 29, 38, 38
Co founder ODDR/Tal Shiar
Regular member of fleet crashing club
“A man's errors are his portals of discovery.”
James Joyce
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 17:25
|
#263
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
Who wouldn't enjoy a competing alliance to receive daily incoming, that ties some fleets to cover it? I wish the very same for all of u I still how ever fail to see any good reason on damaging his own alliance with it. When there are no real gains, nor universal political reasons for it, as you stated KittenZ is only #1 on scoreboard, they are behind both p3ng and Apprime on value and roids too.
It is either #1 vendetta or #2 block reason, which everyone tries to deny with best of their abilities.
|
No, that's just an assumption.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 17:27
|
#264
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
KittenZ hit on randomly picked gals for early roids. There is no aim for Bows or anyone else particular. There were more early attackers than I expected btw. So I assume unless u had traded some early coords, u received other incs too
Also only you seem to take it personal And on what stage when you werent gaining roids and loosing ranks u still kept KittenZ as a best possible target out there? :P
You could just admit the obvious.
|
So what you are saying that we should focus on the value heavy alliances, or alliances that have a less favourable ship strat vs ours, or alliance with less roids, and alliances that arnt ptargetting/FCing us and that aint our top hostiles?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 18:58
|
#265
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
You self asked for the incs. Its not like u will be ignored from daily incs. Get real.
Lokken is such a troll it seems
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
18 Jun 2017, 20:15
|
#266
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
You self asked for the incs. Its not like u will be ignored from daily incs. Get real.
|
So is it me thats complaining about personal vendettas and what not now?
Thats the worst attempt ive ever seen about trying to turn around the discussion thats its us crying.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
19 Jun 2017, 07:18
|
#267
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Who wants some popcorn?
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
19 Jun 2017, 13:22
|
#268
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunterrrr
Who wants some popcorn?
|
Need Ice badly pal... Hot Hot Hot
32c in Devon pals
burning up
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 01:30
|
#269
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Seems like ND is closing up to #3 at an impressive rate.
Maybe midround is when the ND roid machine starts fireing at all cylinders usualy?
I seem to remeber they being in an similiar situation last round.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 06:12
|
#270
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
You are all ridiculous blockwh*res
No class what so ever.
The harder they come, the harder they fall!
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 09:59
|
#271
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
When do bully tactics actually work in PA?
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 11:42
|
#272
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
When do bully tactics actually work in PA?
|
Do you feel bullied CBA?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 19:51
|
#273
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
When do bully tactics actually work in PA?
|
Indd, keep it coming! <3
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 12:27
|
#274
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 79
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
So who will win? I guess Kitty after app and pingu crashroided each other or CT being napped to 9/11 alliances
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 12:48
|
#275
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Ult
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 12:57
|
#276
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorf
CT being napped to 9/11 alliances
|
*4/11
You know there's an alliance relations page where you can find this info without having to strain your tiny brain?
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 12:59
|
#277
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
maybe he was referring to 9/11 being a conspiracy
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 13:42
|
#278
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
You know there's an alliance relations page where you can find this info without having to strain your tiny brain?
|
Not all NAPs are made ingame.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 13:57
|
#279
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Not all NAPs are made ingame.
|
Ours are.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 14:22
|
#280
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Ours are.
|
The ones you know about. You don't have gm access.
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 14:25
|
#281
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Ours are!
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 14:32
|
#282
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
Ours are!
|
Only the ones YOU know about, you dont have SmartAss access
The bots make deals, without us knowing.
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 14:33
|
#283
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Ours are.
|
Suuure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
Ours are!
|
Suuure!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 15:14
|
#284
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 168
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorf
So who will win? I guess Kitty after app and pingu crashroided each other or CT being napped to 9/11 alliances
|
it's pretty much p3n/ult/bf that sorts the crashing we just def
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 15:19
|
#285
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Ours are.
|
Does that include all the secret CT NAPs even CT arnt aware of?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 15:50
|
#286
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Ult
|
P3ng this is just the start of their master plan pal!
They are doing good staying below -20% per day.
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 16:57
|
#287
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 79
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
*4/11
You know there's an alliance relations page where you can find this info without having to strain your tiny brain?
|
Why do you think, I have a tiny brain?
|
|
|
27 Jun 2017, 23:32
|
#288
|
Addicted since R17
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 141
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Heard a hilarious joke today...
Alliance A doesn't want alliance B to win,,,so tells alliance C to hit alliance B or they will hit alliance C and let alliance B win ..... Oh but they want alliance C to win....
Hmm mmm what?
So an advisor to Trump is involved maybe
I wish i got high still ,someone else clearly is
__________________
h-a = CT = h-a = Vision = ODDR = Apprime = ODDR = xVx = h-a = xVx = ODDR -Ult -Rock--Fang-HODORS-ODDR-ND-Kittenz-Carisian-Vgn-Tal Shiar-CaRn-ODDR
Best finish's 15, 17, 18, 25, 27, 27, 29, 38, 38
Co founder ODDR/Tal Shiar
Regular member of fleet crashing club
“A man's errors are his portals of discovery.”
James Joyce
|
|
|
28 Jun 2017, 00:42
|
#289
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Fake News Greg!!! clearly alliance D is trolling alliance A's to make them do this.
nm still confuzzled
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
28 Jun 2017, 10:10
|
#290
|
Addicted since R17
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 141
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Are you alliance D gm Pesky Scots run everything in secret , cept the Lionz tour unfortunately, Seymour deserves a start eh
__________________
h-a = CT = h-a = Vision = ODDR = Apprime = ODDR = xVx = h-a = xVx = ODDR -Ult -Rock--Fang-HODORS-ODDR-ND-Kittenz-Carisian-Vgn-Tal Shiar-CaRn-ODDR
Best finish's 15, 17, 18, 25, 27, 27, 29, 38, 38
Co founder ODDR/Tal Shiar
Regular member of fleet crashing club
“A man's errors are his portals of discovery.”
James Joyce
|
|
|
4 Jul 2017, 01:07
|
#291
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 110
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
I have nothing to add to this discussion, but I want my 15 roids.
Also, super active round from ultores, much effort. We were awesome
__________________
[G-II][Quha][LDK][Apprime][Ultores] - Xerxes
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46.
| |