Quote:
Originally Posted by tetrac
5:7 is definetly not a candidate since they have no Asc/App planets
1:4 has a good fence but already proven roidable
1:2 good gal but are in a similar position to 5:7 in that Asc/App won't let them win.
Long way to go but I think 3:1 or 3:2 will win comfortably in the end once Ascendancy start taking a value lead.
|
Good lord. So a weaker Ascendancy than last round where the entire universe co-operated to ensure their gals wouldn't win is in a better position this round (when none of their gals are among the top 3) to get #1 gal? I'm not saying they might not win but I will guarantee you it won't be by more than a few million as there'll be far too much anti-ascendancy spirit out there. Personally I reckon 1.4 will win. It's a bit of a compromise gal and has some good players. It's retarded to try and count different gals out of it at this stage though.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wishmaster
I dont know what ur getting at here. again...
I think and hope my gal will win this round. however, we have not been gaining roids as nicely as 1:4 the past days ( week ) also we are 13 people in comparison to alot of gals with 14. Nothing is decided yet.
|
Obviously not. I simply took
Quote:
|
1:4 looks most focused atm.
|
to mean you thought they were favourites for the gal win. As you obviously don't and think your own gal will win my apologies for misinterpreting you!
Quote:
Also, I have felt I ve deserved gal win more before than I have so far this round if we do actually win. gettign no incs makes the gal inactive and the round boring. Problem this round so far has been that when a top gal first get icncs, it has been an ott teamup from 4-5 alliances.
( btw like how ur joining fcrew and then getting them for flak, should even out crashes somewhat!? )
|
Over the topness is good for efficiency I've heard. I don't even get linguistically what your last sentence is about (although I guess it's a joke!)