Planetarion Forums
Page 1 of 3 1 23
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Planetarion Forums (https://pirate.planetarion.com/index.php)
-   Alliance Discussions (https://pirate.planetarion.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   "Blocks" (https://pirate.planetarion.com/showthread.php?t=193799)

Heartless 14 Feb 2007 15:10
"Blocks"
 
Which ones exist this round apart from Destiny/VGN? I don't want to blame them alone for driving the game back into the pre-1up boredom.

BloodyButcher 14 Feb 2007 15:56
Re: "Blocks"
 
I also wanted to ask the excat same question :D

jerome 14 Feb 2007 15:58
Re: "Blocks"
 
ascendancy+omen block vs f-crew

Mek 14 Feb 2007 15:58
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
Which ones exist this round apart from Destiny/VGN? I don't want to blame them alone for driving the game back into the pre-1up boredom.
which fountain of knowledge you drag that 1 out of or are you just full of shit as usual?

Almeida 14 Feb 2007 16:01
Re: "Blocks"
 
i vote for: "full of shit as usual"

btw, little girl: 1up didn't end the boredom; r11 and r12 been boring as hell; thanks to 1up.

go and play with your dolls instead of talking about PA politics

Heartless 14 Feb 2007 16:06
Re: "Blocks"
 
I asked the tasty green faery and she told me a secret about Sjor's political preferences some galaxy setups.

God, even the quality of flamers dropped, boy this game got so boring.

PS: My dolls are broken, care to lend me yours, little sister?

Marv 14 Feb 2007 16:10
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
I asked the tasty green faery and she told me a secret about Sjor's political preferences some galaxy setups.
fairy

Heartless 14 Feb 2007 16:13
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv
fairy
That's an alternate way for writing it, yeah.

Almeida 14 Feb 2007 16:14
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
PS: My dolls are broken, care to lend me yours, little sister?
just because i wear a pink bra doesn't mean that i am a girl :mad: take that insult back!

`mac^ 14 Feb 2007 16:16
Re: "Blocks"
 
Can we see some proof of a block pls?

ps. a double booking of a gal doesnt count :(

Forest 14 Feb 2007 16:38
Re: "Blocks"
 
Ok,

Destiny and VGN have 'an avoidance agreement'. This has been confirmed by both alliances. Funny how the #1 and #2 alliance nap each other :D
VGN must think Destiny are stupid :D

Orbit launch on 3 gals per night, nearly always CT. But they deny working with destiny and i have no proof to suggest they are at this time.

Ascendency are attacking everyone, and attacking with everyone, go you!

Thats about all as far as blocks are concerned so far this round.

I dont see this round decending into a block war because its only Destiny and VGN who are co-operating with each other, and the other main alliances are head strong enough to go it alone, and be confident in there ability not to need to block.

Mek 14 Feb 2007 16:49
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Ok,

Destiny and VGN have 'an avoidance agreement'. This has been confirmed by both alliances.
if it has been confirmed by both alliances perhaps you wouldnt mind divulgeing your proof to the community, or are you "pulling a heartless"?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Orbit launch on 3 gals per night, nearly always CT. But they deny working with destiny and i have no proof to suggest they are at this time.
perhaps because you have retarded DC's who cover themselves massively over CT members? Orbit realise this means CT members are easy roids? Also knowing crowly, the leader of orbit, i know he is headstrong enough and cares about his players enough to put their best interests first. in my opinion, and im sure crowlys opinion, its not to Orbits benefit to work with Destiny, or anyone else for that matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I dont see this round decending into a block war because its only Destiny and VGN who are co-operating with each other, and the other main alliances are head strong enough to go it alone, and be confident in there ability not to need to block.
once again, show us proof or your point holds no water at all.

to summarise, CT are doing a piss poor job at propganda :)

Sjor 14 Feb 2007 16:52
Re: "Blocks"
 
i napped the peniz ally (if he is in a state to remember my coords)

Mighteh 14 Feb 2007 16:58
Re: "Blocks"
 
oh god, here we go with speculating drivel again... every round, i swear...

That little tasty green fairy (marv correcting people's mistakes !?! thats new and highly entertaining), or be that faery, just might be
A) full of shit and disinformation, or
B) Product of your unplanned yet scheduled overdose on Absinthe.

but i guess all is good in politics and war. even sending random "non-involved" parties to speculate.

Forest. stfu already. noone ever took you serious (just as much, if not less as me). Your propaganda attempts are pathetic at that aswell.
You can spam the boards up and down with your random letters. they will remain just that.

You sit in your hole with no window and dream up situations by looking at sandmans (if that). Go defleech some more next time i come over.

MAsta_MArk 14 Feb 2007 17:01
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Orbit launch on 3 gals per night, nearly always CT. But they deny working with destiny and i have no proof to suggest they are at this time.
See now we have had a talk with AngryDuck about this, and he understands it.
We do not launch with destiny, before destiny, for destiny or have any form of "deal" , "nap" or "agreement" with destiny. It was pure coincidence that we happen to launch on CT heavy gals 3 times in a row :/ its not our fault your everywhere :(

`mac^ 14 Feb 2007 17:01
Re: "Blocks"
 
At least Forest gives us something to debate on these boards which is a lot more than most people.

Crowly 14 Feb 2007 17:04
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Orbit launch on 3 gals per night, nearly always CT. But they deny working with destiny and i have no proof to suggest they are at this time.
At the moment we're working on targets of opportunity, if CT gals are fat and look hittable, then they have a good chance of being selected as the ones we'll hit. I am pretty sure that you're seeing cloaks and daggers where there are none.

There's a fence, it's comfortable, and we're sitting right on it.


Just a tip though, running around foaming at the mouth and hurling accusations at people doesn't endear you to them. Let Angryduck to the politics, he can not only spell 'diplomacy' but can also practice it.

Heartless 14 Feb 2007 17:04
Re: "Blocks"
 
Well it's certainly too much brainpower involved for you to realize this mek, but it's rather easy to spot. Look at Sandmans history for the top 10 alliances, take a close look at who lost how much and who gained. Then add-in that vgn/destiny share quite a few galaxies (I stopped counting after the first dozen) and that Sjor (nowadays VGN) openly stated his preference of a settled block-war. The denial of an agreeement between Destiny and VGN just tops it all. :o :yawn:

But then again, of course, it is all just speculation and shit ;)

Anyway, who else has agreements on the table? It's not as easy to spot as the Dest/VGN one, and as I stated initially I want to blame more alliances :crymeariver:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowly
At the moment we're working on targets of opportunity, if CT gals are fat and look hittable, then they have a good chance of being selected as the ones we'll hit. I am pretty sure that you're seeing cloaks and daggers where there are none.

There's a fence, it's comfortable, and we're sitting right on it.
If CT gals are fat, what are Dest/VGN gals then? Just judging by the average roid count on sandmans, that is. But at least heads up for admitting to sit on the fence :) Let's hope you won't fall from it nor get it stuffed up your ass by someone. I just wonder since when AD can do politics? :D

Cartman 14 Feb 2007 17:06
Re: "Blocks"
 
tbh .. when have proof ever been shown on AD to back up a statement?
AD is about stating things and peeps belive or not depending on how they feel or care about the issue :P

Mek 14 Feb 2007 17:10
Re: "Blocks"
 
sandmans doesnt count for shit when u look at it. there could be a reason why destiny and vgn gain day in and day out. one of them could be that CT are just not able to cut it? from what ive heard CT DC's are doing a less than adequate job at covering calls on members, but superb at covering their own incs. if a team has 10 DC's and they are def leeching ofc that leads to losses for the other 50 CT members if Destiny are going for them all guns. what it doesnt automatically mean is that there is co-operation in there.

the words "jumping" and "the gun" come to mind

perhaps you, heartless, should do a bit more research into what exactly is going on between vgn/dest/ct etc before thinking you know it all...

Heartless 14 Feb 2007 17:11
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
perhaps you, heartless, should do a bit more research into what exactly is going on between vgn/dest/ct etc before thinking you know it all...
Oh crap, and here I thought it would be Alliance Discussions not Alliance Facts :rolleyes:

But yes, you're opinion would sound reasonable if there wouldn't be the same kind of leechers playing in vgn and destiny.

Crowly 14 Feb 2007 17:13
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
Look at Sandmans history for the top 10 alliances, take a close look at who lost how much and who gained.
We lost a lot of roids and TGV gained a lot last night! That's it! It's war! [/sarcasm]

Quote:
If CT gals are fat, what are Dest/VGN gals then? Just judging by the average roid count on sandmans, that is. But at least heads up for admitting to sit on the fence :) Let's hope you won't fall from it nor get it stuffed up your ass by someone. I just wonder since when AD can do politics? :D
Yup, and if we see a gal that we like that is a Dest/VGN gal, we might well choose them, not that I have ever shared a word with a VGN HC, so it's a bit of a stretch to assume we're not hitting them.

I am sure we'll pick our side when the time comes.

demiGOD 14 Feb 2007 17:13
Re: "Blocks"
 
I am NAP'd with everyone tonight for Valentine's Day.

Fact.

Mek 14 Feb 2007 17:13
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
Oh crap, and here I thought it would be Alliance Discussions not Alliance Facts :rolleyes:
it is alliance discussion, but it helps if you have facts to back up your extravagant claims :P

JonnyBGood 14 Feb 2007 17:13
Re: "Blocks"
 
If Vengeance want I'll go along in their gal raids where all those destiny planets never seem to get incoming. I know how difficult it is to remember to click the issue orders button after you've accidentally brutally stabbed yourself in the eye fifteen times while shaving.

Nadar 14 Feb 2007 17:15
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by demiGOD
I am NAP'd with everyone tonight for Valentine's Day.

Fact.
Aww... let's send some ships over to this guys planet tonight to celebrate Valentines :D

demiGOD 14 Feb 2007 17:16
Re: "Blocks"
 
Talk to wakey. He's got my coords.

Mek 14 Feb 2007 17:17
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by demiGOD
I am NAP'd with everyone tonight for Valentine's Day.

Fact.
demigod for president :)

Forest 14 Feb 2007 17:49
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
if it has been confirmed by both alliances perhaps you wouldnt mind divulgeing your proof to the community, or are you "pulling a heartless"?




perhaps because you have retarded DC's who cover themselves massively over CT members? Orbit realise this means CT members are easy roids? Also knowing crowly, the leader of orbit, i know he is headstrong enough and cares about his players enough to put their best interests first. in my opinion, and im sure crowlys opinion, its not to Orbits benefit to work with Destiny, or anyone else for that matter.



once again, show us proof or your point holds no water at all.

to summarise, CT are doing a piss poor job at propganda :)
1) It is not pulling a heartless or anything else for tat matter. HC in both alliaces have a non avoidnace agreement. they are quite open about it.

One even pm'd me to assure me it wasnt permanent :D


2) DC's in CT certainly do not overcover themselves. Infact, they rarely even do there own calls.

3) You want me to provide proof that there is no block? Huh? How is it even possible? My belief is that this round will not descend into block wars. thats not 'holding no water' but more a belief i ahve knowing the guys who are in charge in the alilances taht matter.

Alki 14 Feb 2007 17:51
Re: "Blocks"
 
way to avoid it :salute:

Forest 14 Feb 2007 17:53
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAsta_MArk
See now we have had a talk with AngryDuck about this, and he understands it.
We do not launch with destiny, before destiny, for destiny or have any form of "deal" , "nap" or "agreement" with destiny. It was pure coincidence that we happen to launch on CT heavy gals 3 times in a row :/ its not our fault your everywhere :(
Umm.

Thats what I said.

I stated that you ahve been attacking CT gals. You have. You dont deny it.

I stated I have no evidnece of you working with Destiny. Its true. I dont!

Forest 14 Feb 2007 17:57
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighteh

Forest. stfu already. noone ever took you serious (just as much, if not less as me). Your propaganda attempts are pathetic at that aswell.
You can spam the boards up and down with your random letters. they will remain just that.

You sit in your hole with no window and dream up situations by looking at sandmans (if that). Go defleech some more next time i come over.
You really dont ahve a clue.

YOUR hc have stated they hve an avoidance pact with VGN. VGN hc have said the same. Thats come from your alliance, not me.

I dont believe this round will end up in a block war. Thats my belief.

Thats not propaganda.

So, either you could try and put something constructive on things, or fk off from the thread and let those who want to, discuss it.

Mek 14 Feb 2007 17:57
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
1) It is not pulling a heartless or anything else for tat matter. HC in both alliaces have a non avoidnace agreement. they are quite open about it.

One even pm'd me to assure me it wasnt permanent :D


2) DC's in CT certainly do not overcover themselves. Infact, they rarely even do there own calls.

3) You want me to provide proof that there is no block? Huh? How is it even possible? My belief is that this round will not descend into block wars. thats not 'holding no water' but more a belief i ahve knowing the guys who are in charge in the alilances taht matter.
ill find you on irc in 2 mins and you can show me the logs...

MotoX 14 Feb 2007 18:33
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Ok,

Destiny and VGN have 'an avoidance agreement'. This has been confirmed by both alliances. Funny how the #1 and #2 alliance nap each other :D
VGN must think Destiny are stupid :D

For the sake of, let’s say that statement is true.

That would also mean that Vgn thinks they can outperform Destiny in the end and walk away with the victory!?

Fs, then Vgn HC:S must be a hole lot more dumber then I thought

JonnyBGood 14 Feb 2007 18:37
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MotoX
For the sake of, let’s say that statement is true.

That would also mean that Vgn thinks they can outperform Destiny in the end and walk away with the victory!?

Fs, then Vgn HC:S must be a hole lot more dumber then I thought
Or it means they think that in a round which is significantly shorter than the norm where a CT Destiny war is ongoing they won't be caught.

MotoX 14 Feb 2007 18:45
Re: "Blocks"
 
Well, we aren’t talking about Angels here….. oh yes that’s right Sjor is in Vgn now..

The other top alliances will not make a “Angel” again because they all want to win and will not settle for 2 or 3:de place.

Rc mayhem 14 Feb 2007 19:33
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowly
Let Angryduck to the politics, he can not only spell 'diplomacy' but can also practice it.
Lol since when?

As always F-crew are playing solo and attack which ever gal looks best without members in. This seems to be working good as always. We are now "full" so will be a little more picky about who we accept and kicking those that are so inactive we can't help them. While our average is low we do have a good number of high score planets to offset some of the bottom end players and Wakey.

Felagund 14 Feb 2007 20:00
Re: "Blocks"
 
Good day of San Valentin heartless and forest :O Lets spread more "love" around the universe

/me love the ppl who love this lovely day . ;o)?

Bane 14 Feb 2007 20:14
Re: "Blocks"
 
This is a great time to launch raids...my ships are spreading 'love' around the universe :bunny:

Bane 14 Feb 2007 20:17
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
ill find you on irc in 2 mins and you can show me the logs...
You'll get off WoW for pa? Lies!

Bashar 14 Feb 2007 20:19
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rc mayhem
Lol since when?

As always F-crew are playing solo and attack which ever gal looks best without members in.
You forgot to account for the great big chip you always carry around on your shoulders which imbalance your perspective on what looks best.

Sjor 14 Feb 2007 20:32
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
Well it's certainly too much brainpower involved for you to realize this mek, but it's rather easy to spot. Look at Sandmans history for the top 10 alliances, take a close look at who lost how much and who gained. Then add-in that vgn/destiny share quite a few galaxies (I stopped counting after the first dozen) and that Sjor (nowadays VGN) openly stated his preference of a settled block-war. The denial of an agreeement between Destiny and VGN just tops it all. :o :yawn:

But then again, of course, it is all just speculation and shit ;)

Anyway, who else has agreements on the table? It's not as easy to spot as the Dest/VGN one, and as I stated initially I want to blame more alliances :crymeariver:



If CT gals are fat, what are Dest/VGN gals then? Just judging by the average roid count on sandmans, that is. But at least heads up for admitting to sit on the fence :) Let's hope you won't fall from it nor get it stuffed up your ass by someone. I just wonder since when AD can do politics? :D

Hearty please enlighten me what did i state? specially also as i have done nothing in politics up to now

If i remember we have hardly taled this round nor been to often in same channels where i talked so please come with info

and also the gal setups as it was max 2 gals i helped setting up :o

Jonas 14 Feb 2007 20:33
Re: "Blocks"
 
AD <3

Read the two first posts of a thread, then read the two last. You realize the post is either terribly offtopic or full of lies and you go read the news \o/

Heartless 14 Feb 2007 20:50
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sjor
Hearty please enlighten me what did i state? specially also as i have done nothing in politics up to now

If i remember we have hardly taled this round nor been to often in same channels where i talked so please come with info

and also the gal setups as it was max 2 gals i helped setting up :o
Ok, so it might not have been your mistake (we will never know, because as usual nobody except the parties which did actually make the agreements know about the details and I wasn't part of it :)), but here is what you said in this thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sjor
(I am a friend of stagnant politics as I rather have 1 friend for whole round than 4 friends rotating)
That does definately support my claim that if you were HC you'd be one of those which would prefer to block pre-round ;)

Almeida 14 Feb 2007 21:00
Re: "Blocks"
 
no, he only stated that, if it happens that his ally blocks (an agreement can be made pretick, or anytime during the round) he rather sticks to his block partner, than exchange block partners every few ticks.

he nowhere stated his prefered time when the block has to be created

Heartless 14 Feb 2007 21:30
Re: "Blocks"
 
Since we're in pedantic mode now, he said "for whole round" which does mean from pt 0 to pt <whatever-it-ends>. If that ain't a pre-round created block then I am not sure ;)

carDi 14 Feb 2007 21:32
Re: "Blocks"
 
hey HEY HEY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :devil: stop whining :D

Mighteh 14 Feb 2007 21:35
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by [LDK]CarDinaL
hey HEY HEY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :devil: stop whining :D
indeed

spoken like true Fat Albert fan :D

carDi 14 Feb 2007 21:40
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighteh
indeed

spoken like true Fat Albert fan :D
sorry dont know him :D but i know that u r fat :D asslooking :D

Rc mayhem 14 Feb 2007 21:53
Re: "Blocks"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bashar
You forgot to account for the great big chip you always carry around on your shoulders which imbalance your perspective on what looks best.
Or perhaps he really pisses me off and I have only ever agreed with this often skewed view once? (see suggestions forum) If I left the community nothing would change, if he left there may be some improvement due to the reduction in out of place, over zealous and aggressive comments aimed at anyone who doesn't agree with him, including the new players that are so vital to our survival. While I know lots of people don't like me, which you have good reason to, I have never caused anyone to stop using these forums, leading them to leave the game.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:26.
Page 1 of 3 1 23
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018