Planetarion Forums

Androme · 12 Oct 2007, 13:34

is it dead?

All Systems Go · 12 Oct 2007, 13:36

Excuse me, but has this thread about a thread been approved in the thread approval thread?

I don't think it has!

Androme · 12 Oct 2007, 13:39

i received it in a pm

Ste · 12 Oct 2007, 16:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Androme2

is it dead?

I'm sure when a funny thread comes along it will be moved there eventually.

The facebook group is going strong though

Hebdomad · 12 Oct 2007, 20:11

it depends on your definition of dead.

All Systems Go · 12 Oct 2007, 20:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hebdomad

it depends on your definition of dead.

A good first date.

Hebdomad · 13 Oct 2007, 00:39

i'm not really dead. i am sleeping. i am waiting to pounce.

Hebdomad · 13 Oct 2007, 00:42

i am sleeping under your bed.

Androme · 13 Oct 2007, 02:15

in my head i am sleeping but in reality i'm an insomniac

Hicks · 13 Oct 2007, 11:12

I can't believe I'm not on this elite Facebook group ! Clearly I'm a second tier poster.

_Kila_ · 13 Oct 2007, 12:17

you just have to ask Hicks

Mzyxptlk · 13 Oct 2007, 13:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hebdomad

i'm not really dead. i am sleeping. i am waiting to pounce.

Parrot sketch.

Tomkat · 13 Oct 2007, 22:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hicks

I can't believe I'm not on this elite Facebook group ! Clearly I'm a second tier poster.

You've met me which pushes you up the ranks a little bit.

I mean Kila is in the group and he's pretty much at the bottom of the internet hierarchy.

Yahwe · 13 Oct 2007, 22:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

You've met me which pushes you up the ranks a little bit.

I mean Kila is in the group and he's pretty much at the bottom of the internet hierarchy.

but he has a lovely stomach

Tomkat · 13 Oct 2007, 23:55

Alas, not a qualification for quick ascension of internet ranks.

Yahwe · 14 Oct 2007, 00:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

Alas, not a qualification for quick ascension of internet ranks.

that's not clear

Yahwe · 14 Oct 2007, 18:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by horn

no one but you wants to talk with crap male internet users just because they're good looking i think was what he was saying.

I feel your bitterness but it's not my fault you are ugly.

You Are Gay · 15 Oct 2007, 14:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by horn

damn, because the first 5 times you asked me to take my trousers off over the phone i was starting to approach the mirror in different ways.

If you allow sexual harrassment to persist then you are an ENABLER and just as bad as the sexual deviant (in this case Yahwe). You sicken me.

You Are Gay · 15 Oct 2007, 14:42

By which my previous post means "Horn was gagging for it from a man 'cause he loved the attention".

You Are Gay · 15 Oct 2007, 15:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by horn

if gays cannot reproduce because they are evolutionarily speaking "wrong" doe that not mean they are evolutionarily speaking "bad"? maybe even.... morally bad? is killing a gay like killing a disabled?

Evolution is about the transmission of genes. "Gay" genes may survive because in a heterozygous state they increase "fitness" (i.e. an organism with those genes is more likely to pass on their genes to the next generation). Fitness may be increased by making the organism a more caring parent for example (i have no idea of a specific area which "gay" genes actually do increase fitness). A more caring parent means that more young survive etc.

Alternatively a gay organism could increase the fitness of certain genes by improving the fitness of its relations. In this case a gay "Uncle" improves your environmetal conditions (helping with raising etc). In this instance the "gay" genes are not passed on by the "gay" organism but rather by it's relations.

As such "gay" organisms are not evolutionary bad. We can tell that they are not evolutionary bad as they exist.

Are "gay" organisms morally bad? That question would require an evaluation of all the different human societies (i suspect animals don't give a ****) in existence. This is because moral values are not intrinsic. I cannot be arsed making such an evalutation. I would say that Christianity may deem homosexuality to be (morally) wrong based on the Old Testament (which was written when i suspect people didn't appreciate the evolutionary value of having gay people). The New Testament preaches "love for all". Christianity is, as such, somehwhat "confused".

You Are Gay · 15 Oct 2007, 15:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by horn

yeah i was just joking. consider yourself trolled mr.fake account.

Marilyn Manson · 15 Oct 2007, 16:48

I always added to it in the good ole days. Of course, that was when humour was still possible, the forum was full of activity, and the world was young.

Now... bleh.

Mzyxptlk · 15 Oct 2007, 17:35

pic or it didn't happen

Yahwe · 15 Oct 2007, 19:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marilyn Manson

I always added to it in the good ole days. Of course, that was when humour was still possible, the forum was full of activity, and the world was young.

Now... bleh.

let's grow old disgracefully

Marilyn Manson · 16 Oct 2007, 15:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yahwe

let's grow old disgracefully

Already doing that. But I feel warm inside now that I know that it's a team effort.