|
29 Feb 2008, 21:24
|
#1
|
break it down!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,087
|
Top 100
can someone post the top100 list thing for those of us who don't have a planet please?
__________________
I put the sex in dyslexia!
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:26
|
#2
|
aka Duncan
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 49
|
Re: Top 100
goto sandmans.co.uk
__________________
[Phoenix Alliance] round 1 - 4
[Wolfpack] round 7 - 10
[NewDawn] round 11 - 12, 15 - 16
[h3lls angels] round 20
[NewDawn] round 25,26,27,29
[Conspiracy] round 40
[NewDawn] round 70 - 73
[DLR] Round 30,31,33 - 39,41 - 46,49,50,74,75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
He's a hick. In charge of an alliance. It's like giving the Dukes of Hazzard a tank division to control.
|
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:26
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Top 100
Code:
Planets - Top 100
Rank Change Coords Ruler Planet Race Size Score
1 6:3:4 santa Conspiracy Xan 3,653 11,853,457
2 up 1 11:7:13 Byrney NewDawn Etd 2,403 10,974,587
3 down 1 6:3:9 Wishmaster Urwins Zik 4,184 10,576,795
4 11:7:2 Smasher xVx Xan 4,053 10,112,402
5 11:7:6 BiGBaD TGV Xan 1,556 9,856,159
6 11:7:7 XceL Urwins Zik 3,700 9,301,906
7 2:9:5 D3coy xVx Zik 2,559 9,020,657
8 9:5:7 Turtle Urwins Ter 2,785 8,869,338
9 up 1 3:7:5 Reese Urwins Etd 2,926 8,837,624
10 down 1 6:3:19 Mystic Urwins Etd 4,007 8,720,986
11 11:7:9 HTDespoiler Vengeance Etd 2,530 8,582,719
12 3:5:14 eksero Urwins Zik 3,228 8,496,043
13 up 1 3:7:3 BlueAdept Vengeance Ter 2,030 8,369,933
14 down 1 11:7:4 voodoo Urwins Xan 2,657 8,156,361
15 7:2:2 Ronin Conspiracy Xan 1,385 8,101,371
16 9:8:1 Grog NewDawn Ter 2,559 8,096,621
17 3:6:11 VenoX Urwins Etd 2,735 7,706,391
18 up 4 9:5:1 [Dreamz] Urwins Etd 1,805 7,659,212
19 down 1 11:7:11 xls TGV Zik 1,790 7,622,556
20 down 1 6:3:8 Callan NewDawn Etd 2,280 7,422,689
21 down 1 11:2:6 booji TGV Ter 1,487 7,399,974
22 up 1 5:8:7 BaasB Urwins Etd 2,364 7,335,392
23 down 2 9:8:3 zebra NewDawn Ter 1,733 7,248,327
24 8:6:4 grayavatar NewDawn Etd 1,510 6,982,042
25 up 9 3:5:12 BozE ROCK Xan 2,533 6,973,670
26 down 1 3:5:6 god Ascendancy Ter 2,508 6,968,077
27 down 1 2:9:9 Londo Subh Etd 894 6,830,099
28 down 1 3:5:2 LordOfNone Ascendancy Zik 1,458 6,816,385
29 down 1 8:6:6 killerbee xVx Xan 2,174 6,809,785
30 down 1 6:3:7 Valle Ascendancy Etd 2,021 6,576,973
31 5:5:14 Tronick Conspiracy Zik 1,775 6,567,025
32 down 2 7:2:10 Drago ROCK Xan 1,206 6,483,937
33 down 1 2:10:12 codynt ROCK Ter 1,428 6,479,137
34 up 2 3:5:4 JBG Ascendancy Ter 2,573 6,439,239
35 up 11 4:3:6 Hut Vengeance Etd 1,706 6,430,910
36 up 1 5:1:7 theodb NewDawn Etd 914 6,416,870
37 down 2 9:5:2 koyochi ROCK Ter 2,328 6,396,982
38 down 5 11:4:10 Gothic Ðragons Cat 435 6,372,645
39 down 1 8:6:7 Bouygeus Vengeance Xan 2,199 6,302,036
40 up 1 3:3:3 Captain Vengeance Etd 1,941 6,287,864
41 down 2 5:7:6 Cead Ascendancy Ter 2,284 6,261,770
42 down 2 1:4:9 Ivor ROCK Etd 1,033 6,257,500
43 down 1 5:8:2 Nitor NewDawn Ter 2,331 6,249,668
44 down 1 8:6:12 IsilX Ascendancy Ter 2,066 6,215,519
45 down 1 3:3:6 t-dub Howling Rain Etd 1,474 6,164,351
46 up 6 4:8:15 Champ_nr1 NewDawn Ter 1,624 6,161,531
47 down 2 3:5:10 KOOL Conspiracy Zik 1,494 6,160,527
48 down 1 3:5:1 Achi Ascendancy Ter 1,710 6,058,504
49 up 1 9:1:7 Hude Ascendancy Ter 1,281 6,042,420
50 down 2 5:10:5 Zeb NewDawn Etd 860 6,035,896
51 down 2 3:3:13 NitinA Ascendancy Ter 3,225 6,025,330
52 up 8 3:5:9 Chedderz Ascendancy Ter 2,264 6,016,689
53 down 2 11:2:1 TheShadow xVx Xan 1,704 6,001,332
54 7:2:9 Ninja xVx Xan 1,674 5,883,637
55 down 2 10:9:1 Sleepless Conspiracy Etd 2,624 5,870,593
56 up 6 11:7:5 Rykone xVx Zik 1,578 5,813,347
57 up 2 1:8:8 Nicole xVx Etd 1,257 5,812,159
58 down 3 2:6:4 FrostyZ NewDawn Ter 1,649 5,756,916
59 down 2 1:4:10 raketman Hidden Agenda Ter 1,387 5,753,660
60 down 4 5:7:2 Mikesrealgood Urwins Ter 2,010 5,747,568
61 up 2 3:3:15 aragno xVx Xan 2,883 5,707,087
62 up 9 8:6:9 PK Hidden Agenda Cat 1,852 5,702,267
63 down 5 8:6:15 Storebo xVx Etd 1,936 5,696,204
64 up 12 4:10:6 Cronix Conspiracy Xan 2,229 5,687,106
65 down 4 2:7:3 Timur xVx Ter 1,353 5,658,267
66 down 2 7:2:7 Sjimbo Vengeance Cat 538 5,563,882
67 down 2 2:8:7 Dealer TGV Ter 2,000 5,560,166
68 up 2 6:3:14 Exor Conspiracy Etd 2,045 5,532,051
69 2:9:3 Inforza Ascendancy Ter 2,182 5,520,241
70 up 8 7:9:5 ThunderCat NewDawn Ter 1,492 5,481,544
71 down 5 3:5:16 wanderer TGV Ter 1,574 5,480,560
72 down 5 2:2:4 Endless Howling Rain Xan 1,957 5,479,961
73 up 12 3:2:10 Vash Howling Rain Ter 1,361 5,467,941
74 down 2 9:8:4 ReligFree Conspiracy Ter 2,024 5,461,909
75 down 7 5:5:4 robban Ascendancy Etd 554 5,453,624
76 down 3 6:3:6 Cain I BPd elviz Zik 1,012 5,435,010
77 down 3 11:5:3 Digital xVx Etd 1,128 5,434,098
78 up 14 6:6:4 SteInMetz NewDawn Ter 1,536 5,416,020
79 up 2 5:6:2 Gerbie ROCK Etd 712 5,414,286
80 down 3 8:2:3 Ritch Orbit Etd 1,179 5,395,150
81 down 6 9:1:4 Dirte Ascendancy Ter 1,581 5,380,351
82 down 2 5:9:7 Theodore Orbit Ter 1,154 5,358,440
83 down 4 8:4:7 Amon NewDawn Zik 1,262 5,357,740
84 up 102 1:8:1 celtic xVx Etd 1,130 5,350,968
85 up 10 4:2:3 Mitre Ascendancy Zik 2,146 5,337,801
86 down 4 7:9:8 Biodragon Urwins Ter 1,557 5,332,722
87 down 4 11:5:1 qupi Vengeance Cat 1,526 5,320,808
88 down 4 7:5:1 darts Urwins Etd 1,371 5,305,020
89 down 3 8:2:7 eki TGV Ter 1,388 5,278,926
90 down 3 9:4:2 LionsMight Subh Etd 1,736 5,269,672
91 up 7 8:6:13 Pathogen xVx Etd 2,027 5,248,239
92 down 4 7:2:5 silver^ace Urwins Etd 1,365 5,247,531
93 down 4 2:9:6 Typhoon xVx Ter 1,818 5,227,151
94 down 4 11:7:3 LukeyLove Ascendancy Ter 576 5,217,331
95 down 4 6:6:6 Side Orbit Xan 1,089 5,213,715
96 down 3 8:1:7 Mustaavalkosta Orbit Xan 923 5,192,555
97 down 3 5:8:4 Strider- NewDawn Ter 1,560 5,185,821
98 down 2 11:2:7 dx xVx Ter 1,081 5,150,564
99 down 2 8:2:13 Pipzter xVx Etd 980 5,137,834
100 down 1 1:2:12 Sin Orbit Xan 846 5,117,865
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:31
|
#4
|
NewDawn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 468
|
Re: Top 100
Top 100 Count
xVx 16
Ascendancy 15
NewDawn 14
Urwins 14
Conspiracy 8
Vengeance 7
ROCK 6
TGV 6
Orbit 5
Howling Rain 3
Hidden Agenda 2
Subh 2
Ðragons 1
I BPd elviz 1
__________________
Proud to be Newdawn
Last edited by SteInMetz; 29 Feb 2008 at 21:44.
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:33
|
#5
|
break it down!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDD
goto sandmans.co.uk
|
sandman's doesn't provide nicks and alliances
__________________
I put the sex in dyslexia!
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:34
|
#6
|
aka Duncan
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 49
|
Re: Top 100
yea i just realized that -,- my bad
__________________
[Phoenix Alliance] round 1 - 4
[Wolfpack] round 7 - 10
[NewDawn] round 11 - 12, 15 - 16
[h3lls angels] round 20
[NewDawn] round 25,26,27,29
[Conspiracy] round 40
[NewDawn] round 70 - 73
[DLR] Round 30,31,33 - 39,41 - 46,49,50,74,75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
He's a hick. In charge of an alliance. It's like giving the Dukes of Hazzard a tank division to control.
|
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:42
|
#7
|
h3ll's angels
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 273
|
Re: Top 100
When I referred to Urwins being a top heavy alliance, it was because they have (had) 10 planets in the top 22 and 4 in the rest of the top 100. Having a planet that is attacked far more than the rest of his ally and thus defended more isn't nearly the same thing. And said planet has never had a pnap of any sort, contrary to what some on this forum claim to know.
__________________
[18:04] * h3ll has quit IRC (Ping timeout)
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:46
|
#8
|
NewDawn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 468
|
Re: Top 100
Only rank, nick and alliance if you're lazy
Code:
1 Elviz Conspiracy
2 Byrney NewDawn
3 Wishmaster Urwins
4 Smasher xVx
5 BiGBaD TGV
6 XceL Urwins
7 D3coy xVx
8 Turtle Urwins
9 Reese Urwins
10 Mystic Urwins
11 HTDespoiler Vengeance
12 eksero Urwins
13 BlueAdept Vengeance
14 voodoo Urwins
15 Ronin Conspiracy
16 Grog NewDawn
17 VenoX Urwins
18 [Dreamz] Urwins
19 xls TGV
20 Callan NewDawn
21 booji TGV
22 BaasB Urwins
23 zebra NewDawn
24 grayavatar NewDawn
25 BozE ROCK
26 god Ascendancy
27 Londo Subh
28 LordOfNone Ascendancy
29 killerbee xVx
30 Valle Ascendancy
31 Tronick Conspiracy
32 Drago ROCK
33 codynt ROCK
34 JBG Ascendancy
35 Hut Vengeance
36 theodb NewDawn
37 koyochi ROCK
38 Gothic Ðragons
39 Bouygeus Vengeance
40 Captain Vengeance
41 Cead Ascendancy
42 Ivor ROCK
43 Nitor NewDawn
44 IsilX Ascendancy
45 t-dub Howling Rain
46 Champ_nr1 NewDawn
47 KOOL Conspiracy
48 Achi Ascendancy
49 Hude Ascendancy
50 Zeb NewDawn
51 NitinA Ascendancy
52 Chedderz Ascendancy
53 TheShadow xVx
54 Ninja xVx
55 Sleepless Conspiracy
56 Rykone xVx
57 Nicole xVx
58 FrostyZ NewDawn
59 raketman Hidden Agenda
60 Mikesrealgood Urwins
61 aragno xVx
62 PK Hidden Agenda
63 Storebo xVx
64 Cronix Conspiracy
65 Timur xVx
66 Sjimbo Vengeance
67 Dealer TGV
68 Exor Conspiracy
69 Inforza Ascendancy
70 ThunderCat NewDawn
71 wanderer TGV
72 Endless Howling Rain
73 Vash Howling Rain
74 ReligFree Conspiracy
75 robban Ascendancy
76 Cain I BPd elviz
77 Digital xVx
78 SteInMetz NewDawn
79 Gerbie ROCK
80 Ritch Orbit
81 Dirte Ascendancy
82 Theodore Orbit
83 Amon NewDawn
84 celtic xVx
85 Mitre Ascendancy
86 Biodragon Urwins
87 qupi Vengeance
88 darts Urwins
89 eki TGV
90 LionsMight Subh
91 Pathogen xVx
92 silver^ace Urwins
93 Typhoon xVx
94 LukeyLove Ascendancy
95 Side Orbit
96 Mustaavalkosta Orbit
97 Strider- NewDawn
98 dx xVx
99 Pipzter xVx
100 Sin Orbit
__________________
Proud to be Newdawn
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 21:56
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by zebra
When I referred to Urwins being a top heavy alliance, it was because they have (had) 10 planets in the top 22 and 4 in the rest of the top 100.
|
It's pretty amusing alright.
Quote:
And said planet has never had a pnap of any sort, contrary to what some on this forum claim to know.
|
Given that I presume this is aimed at me I was told this by jerome who was a CT officer in r24 and saw theodb's planet in a column of pnapped planets. Maybe this was some miracle of modern technology I dunno.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 22:08
|
#10
|
h3ll's angels
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 273
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Given that I presume this is aimed at me I was told this by jerome who was a CT officer in r24 and saw theodb's planet in a column of pnapped planets. Maybe this was some miracle of modern technology I dunno.
|
Jerome was mistaken, but the past is the past. Congrats on the most top 100 planets, and further congrats considering none were in the top 25.
__________________
[18:04] * h3ll has quit IRC (Ping timeout)
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 22:10
|
#11
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by zebra
Jerome was mistaken, but the past is the past. Congrats on the most top 100 planets, and further congrats considering none were in the top 25.
|
We didn't get that, I had bad xvx intel
Most top97 planets though!
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
29 Feb 2008, 22:14
|
#12
|
Laziness pays off NOW!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL, USA
Posts: 596
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by zebra
Congrats on the most top 100 planets, and further congrats considering none were in the top 25.
|
*I* only had to whore defence *once* this round.
__________________
Proud to have been :
[ReBorn] High Council - Wing Leader
[Knights] High Council - Founder
[Silver] High Council - Military
[WolfPack] High Council - Military
[Ascendancy] Member
[eXilition] High Council - Defence
7-Round Official Planetarion #Support Team Member
Retired Since Round 21
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 02:44
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 460
|
Re: Top 100
congrats Champ_nr1
and congrats Elviz, your still my bitch though
__________________
Alliance whore.
Attention Whore.
God.
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 03:39
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 64
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by zebra
When I referred to Urwins being a top heavy alliance, it was because they have (had) 10 planets in the top 22 and 4 in the rest of the top 100. Having a planet that is attacked far more than the rest of his ally and thus defended more isn't nearly the same thing. And said planet has never had a pnap of any sort, contrary to what some on this forum claim to know.
|
This is a consequence more of being ptargetted for over 2 weeks than any deliberate policy on our part.
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 04:35
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: Top 100
Awesome, top 20, that was unexpected.
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 08:27
|
#16
|
If not never; then once.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 190
|
Re: Top 100
__________________
You must know that an interesting fate awaits almost everyone, mouse or man, who does not conform.
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 12:36
|
#17
|
self-entitledly superior
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 341
|
Re: Top 100
damn what a disappointment after all the effort i put in
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 13:28
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 601
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
It's pretty amusing alright.
Given that I presume this is aimed at me I was told this by jerome who was a CT officer in r24 and saw theodb's planet in a column of pnapped planets. Maybe this was some miracle of modern technology I dunno.
|
I pm'd you and confirmed 100% that he didn't have a pnap.
__________________
[DLR] [Conspiracy Theory] [1up] [Faceless] [Elysium] [LCH] [NewDawn] [Apprime]
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 16:05
|
#19
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReligFree
I pm'd you and confirmed 100% that he didn't have a pnap.
|
Yeah I believe jerome more than I believe you, sorry. If jer tells me he might have been mistaken then fair enough but I'm more than willing to consider you're just trying to cover up for a friend or whatever.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 19:20
|
#20
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Awesome, top 20, that was unexpected.
|
Yes.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 23:23
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 108
|
Re: Top 100
Shame half of CT including myself crashed on 11 7 2 pfft. Awesome calc
__________________
[SPOOOON]
|
|
|
1 Mar 2008, 23:48
|
#22
|
Aaranaf's Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 237
|
Re: Top 100
elviz won again?
__________________
R3: nub R10: 12:9:1 to 9:7:3 G Rank #14 P Rank #194
R4: 275:6:13 R10.5: 17:9:9 quitter
R5: 4:8:4 to 35:11:x R11: 15:4:9 G Rank #10 P Rank #32
R6: 22:22:11 R12: 29:8:9
R7: 8:16:9 G Rank #52 R13: Forgot
R9: 52:6:5 for a week R14: Forgot
R9.5: 12:7:17 G Rank #17 R17: 14:3:6 G Rank #6 P Rank #9
[1up] Peon
|
|
|
2 Mar 2008, 00:07
|
#23
|
Fook Yu
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Looked pal
Posts: 383
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by rshih
elviz won again?
|
Yes.
__________________
HEROES - It's not cheating if you admit to it
|
|
|
5 Mar 2008, 18:04
|
#24
|
Rebellion Rebelleader
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apeldoorn / Amsterdam
Posts: 330
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Awesome, top 20, that was unexpected.
|
wow great
__________________
NiNEONE
we look a lot tougher then we are
<zhil|reportwrit> Rikard - I dont know you
<zhil|reportwrit> so you're insignificant
eXilition - LCH - Destiny - Conspiracy - Night Witches - eXcessum
|
|
|
5 Mar 2008, 18:17
|
#25
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by rshih
elviz won again?
|
It was close. CT had to sacrifice 7.5mil value on Smasher to guarantee it.
__________________
[ND]
Kicked from Ascendancy
Proud to have been a Dark Lord Rising.
|
|
|
5 Mar 2008, 23:58
|
#26
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
It was close. CT had to sacrifice 7.5mil value on Smasher to guarantee it.
|
BS Gate.
I saw the bcalc, but some attackers recalled which kinda fked the battle for CT.
As it was, it was a close call and I do not understand why Smasher stayed / let his def stay. As BC I d told all to land also I think.
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 00:16
|
#27
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishmaster
BS Gate.
I saw the bcalc, but some attackers recalled which kinda fked the battle for CT.
As it was, it was a close call and I do not understand why Smasher stayed / let his def stay. As BC I d told all to land also I think.
|
Breport, for those that haven't seen it.
I misinterpretted what I was told then, my mistake.
I was told by people in 11:7 that Smasher leaving his spectre at home was an unintended mistake. Without this, the losses (after salvage) would have been 7.5m CT and less than 1m xVx.
I was told by CT member(s) that the calc was based on the assumption that smasher would run his bombers and nothing to do with recalling fleets. They were obviously un- or misinformed. The idea that CT lost control over enough of their members to tip the battle by well over 4.5mil value didn't really cross my mind.
__________________
[ND]
Kicked from Ascendancy
Proud to have been a Dark Lord Rising.
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 00:20
|
#28
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishmaster
BS Gate.
I saw the bcalc, but some attackers recalled which kinda fked the battle for CT.
As it was, it was a close call and I do not understand why Smasher stayed / let his def stay. As BC I d told all to land also I think.
|
The actual calc was something like this which is hardly a definite land. If there had been more than like 4 ascendancy fleets on that wave I'd have recalled it heh.
That's with no recalls for attackers and smasher running his spectres.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 00:25
|
#29
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
Breport, for those that haven't seen it.
I misinterpretted what I was told then, my mistake.
I was told by people in 11:7 that Smasher leaving his spectre at home was an unintended mistake. Without this, the losses (after salvage) would have been 7.5m CT and less than 1m xVx.
I was told by CT member(s) that the calc was based on the assumption that smasher would run his bombers and nothing to do with recalling fleets. They were obviously un- or misinformed. The idea that CT lost control over enough of their members to tip the battle by well over 4.5mil value didn't really cross my mind.
|
I ve seen the actualy breport also, yes. And its nasty for CT.
But, if u check newsie u should see several attackers recalling late tick which tipped the battle. The calc I saw pre landing was without Smashers spectres being twatted also, and irrc the losses were around even with most of the losses being Smashers.
Cant blame bc for thinking it was fake def/they would recall.
But I cant really comment too much about it, as I had nothing to do with it. I just saw some calcs. I have no reason to believe them to not be correct or thought to be correct by ct.
Also, Elviz would have won anyway....
So I dont see why u brought this up m8.
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 01:10
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 367
|
Re: Top 100
According to our calcings Byrney would have won if urwins crashed day before instead of last day :<
Crashes usually dont come when you need it ( if your not named elviz ofc )
__________________
NewDawn - Soaring where angels fear to fly
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 10:34
|
#31
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishmaster
Also, Elviz would have won anyway....
So I dont see why u brought this up m8.
|
Elviz commented before the 11:7 bashing that smasher and bigbad were beating him. This suggests that the huge attack on 11:7 is what tipped the round in his favour.
Without the spectre losses (~1.6m value after salvage) and the roid losses (~1m value over remainder of the round - more if feudal), Smasher's end score would have been pushing 13mil.
EDIT: basically, that battle is probably what won the round for elviz, and possibly lost the round for CT.
__________________
[ND]
Kicked from Ascendancy
Proud to have been a Dark Lord Rising.
Last edited by Gate; 6 Mar 2008 at 12:13.
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 17:53
|
#32
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: Top 100
Silly of smasher and co not to get elviz roided then.
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 18:20
|
#33
|
Adelante
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 855
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
Elviz commented before the 11:7 bashing that smasher and bigbad were beating him. This suggests that the huge attack on 11:7 is what tipped the round in his favour.
Without the spectre losses (~1.6m value after salvage) and the roid losses (~1m value over remainder of the round - more if feudal), Smasher's end score would have been pushing 13mil.
EDIT: basically, that battle is probably what won the round for elviz, and possibly lost the round for CT.
|
Then again.. before that battle there where some heavy attacks on elviz that took away his roid lead. I could say that if noone roided me i'd win the game.. but winner allways is the one on top at the end =/
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 18:26
|
#34
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
The actual calc was something like this which is hardly a definite land. If there had been more than like 4 ascendancy fleets on that wave I'd have recalled it heh.
That's with no recalls for attackers and smasher running his spectres.
|
that was not the calc I was given...
I was at work at the time though, and was just ingame mailed some calcs, so if u say thats how it was, I ll take ur word for it.
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 18:28
|
#35
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
Elviz commented before the 11:7 bashing that smasher and bigbad were beating him. This suggests that the huge attack on 11:7 is what tipped the round in his favour.
Without the spectre losses (~1.6m value after salvage) and the roid losses (~1m value over remainder of the round - more if feudal), Smasher's end score would have been pushing 13mil.
EDIT: basically, that battle is probably what won the round for elviz, and possibly lost the round for CT.
|
Elviz lost more roids than Smasher, didnt he?
Smasher wasnt feud iirc.
Elviz would have won the round even if they had recalled that tick I think.
( all top planets got roided.. cept me. And I didnt win.. so lets just agree that I suck )
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 18:46
|
#36
|
Friends and Foes
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Estonia
Posts: 461
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishmaster
Eso lets just agree that I suck
|
I've been saying it some rounds now, and you denied it :/
__________________
ASCENDANCY
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 18:52
|
#37
|
Poblacht na hÉireann
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,167
|
Re: Top 100
Gate is almost certainly correct about why that attack landed. It was a masterful flak move from Elviz, I admit to being almost as impressed as I was amused at the time. And Wishy, at the time Smasher was winning and would have won all things remaining equal. I don't think it ultimately made any difference to the ending alliance ranks however, although that certainly couldn't have been known at the time.
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 19:39
|
#38
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles
Gate is almost certainly correct about why that attack landed. It was a masterful flak move from Elviz, I admit to being almost as impressed as I was amused at the time. And Wishy, at the time Smasher was winning and would have won all things remaining equal. I don't think it ultimately made any difference to the ending alliance ranks however, although that certainly couldn't have been known at the time.
|
Maybe ur correct.
He didnt deserve to win when he nubed it with the spectres anyway though
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 19:45
|
#39
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Top 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishmaster
that was not the calc I was given...
I was at work at the time though, and was just ingame mailed some calcs, so if u say thats how it was, I ll take ur word for it.
|
http://www.paste.lt/paste/a2af66c059...0f6d69fed81862 was the conversation I had with elviz about it that morning.
PS In that log where I say 5.1 lost for them I was actually just reading off the value lost from the first calc that elviz had pasted with the spectres still included.
PPS Forgot to mention I cut out a few irrelevant bits from that conversation.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
Last edited by JonnyBGood; 6 Mar 2008 at 20:55.
|
|
|
6 Mar 2008, 20:39
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: Top 100
#
JBG> hey
#
Feb 22 11:31:21 <JBG> why aren't you on that wave?
#
Feb 22 11:32:55 <elviz> deffing adjuhh
#
Feb 22 11:33:37 <JBG> on the biggest TA night of the round probably you're using your fr to def?
haha
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
11 Mar 2008, 17:29
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Eindhoven, Holland
Posts: 21
|
Re: Top 100
sounds like a very good reason to me
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28.
| |