Quote:
Originally Posted by MrL_JaKiri
I can't work out if this is a troll or not.
|
Ok. It's a little based on a fairytale. I'm not saying that Bush is wrong when he's saying that he have proves that the Iraq had chemical weapons, but even after winning the war against Iraq, he's still claiming that they have eveidence about Iraq having chemical weapon.
I just think he would be better off, with telling the world that he beated Saddam, instead of keeping mentioning the reason they wen't to war against Iraq. And i'm pretty sure most you ppl have heard the reason why they went to war, were because of all of Iraqs nuclear and chemical power.
In the fairytale, the shepards sheeps gets killed because noone believed the shepard when he screamed wolf one time to much. That Bush started a war against Iraq, is one thing. And i'm glad they they won over him. But the reason they started the war were because of Saddams chemical and maybe nuclear power, and not because the way he treated he's ppl.
The way i consider it, is that it's bloody stupid of Bush, to remind ppl of the world about the reason he went to war against Iraq, without even having any proof to support he's reason for going to war.
After all, they still can't prove that there were any chemical weapons in the first place, so wtf should they be able to prove anything now. Even though most of us think it were right to get Saddam away from his power, shouldn't you atleast start asking the question why they removed him as late as they did. After all, they had the chance to remove him much earlier. Or atleast if you go to war against someone for a reason that you can't prove, then atleast don't remind ppl of your lie.