|
10 Jan 2003, 11:19
|
#1
|
Puppet Master
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 227
|
Blocks?
People talk about blocks all the time, no matter if it's 2 or 20 alliances who are allied. What is the definition for a block in your opinion and do people missuse the word? and powerblock?
It feels like block is a bad word in here. Is it?
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:27
|
#2
|
Paranoid Android
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hell
Posts: 409
|
Re: Blocks?
Quote:
Originally posted by Guran
People talk about blocks all the time, no matter if it's 2 or 20 alliances who are allied. What is the definition for a block in your opinion and do people missuse the word? and powerblock?
It feels like block is a bad word in here. Is it?
|
For this coming round, I would say a block could be definded as any group of alliances who control about 30-40% of the universe.
__________________
God loves his children
[SiN]
Safety in Numbers
NEVER AGAIN! Retired
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:30
|
#3
|
Have D|ck Done Travell
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 491
|
theres been a lot better discussions with arguemnts on various sides debateing this issue if you think your treading new water your in the same fish pond. and as the stocks getting lower with the more attractive fishermen out there it wont really matter if the trout band withthe salmon and the bass band with the pirch because very soon that pond is going to be fished out.
figure it out
__________________
www.planetarion.com
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:35
|
#4
|
Boy without a toy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: #ducks
Posts: 506
|
Re: Re: Blocks?
Quote:
Originally posted by -=Zyth=-
For this coming round, I would say a block could be definded as any group of alliances who control about 30-40% of the universe.
|
Controls 1/3 of universe? Are u insane? Who would want to play then?
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:37
|
#5
|
Paranoid Android
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hell
Posts: 409
|
Re: Re: Re: Blocks?
Quote:
Originally posted by RooKie
Controls 1/3 of universe? Are u insane? Who would want to play then?
|
I make that about 600 players or 60 galaxies, Im not talking members here. Just what they control.
__________________
God loves his children
[SiN]
Safety in Numbers
NEVER AGAIN! Retired
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:38
|
#6
|
Stealth & Shadows
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 192
|
IMHO > Blocks
The word is been killed by misuse, its that simple ... every pre-round we have a huge state of panic in which certain people (no names needed) run around telling the world every little whisper they hear on netgamers, ultimately leading to rumours of power-blocks left right and centre.
I don’t need to remind anyone that the mass majority of these people do not have the slightest clue about the current state of planetarion politics, let alone the definition of a power-block.
Their was an excellent thread regarding blocks last round, i believe it was Rumad's , i maybe wrong, depicting exactly what a block was, in my eyes its a grouping of 'superior' numbers and quality with the intent of using that force against a weaker enemy, example.
Alliance 1 : 70 members.
Alliance 2 : 120 members.
Alliance 1 and 2 allied for R9, in my opinion at this stage their doing nothing wrong, but on the other side of the wall alliance A and B allied (see bellow).
Alliance A : 100 members.
Alliance B : 120 members.
This leads Alliance 1 to add Alliance 3 to their side (perhaps a long-time enemy of alliance A), they also start mass-recruiting to their JR wings, were now left with this.
Alliance 1 : 100 members.
Alliance 2 : 140 members.
Alliance 3 : 90 members.
I have chosen to make alliance 3 small, as this is usually the case, and indeed justification for the block ...
<Fang/Adelante Executive> "ToT are only 'small' so this isn’t a powerblock ... honest."
Perhaps not a great example, but i figured id put the joke on myself so not to offend anyone.
Powerblocking is a result of fear of losing, greed and the willingness to stab allies in the back once your done with them. Arrogance, and i don’t need to remind anyone, theirs no shortage of that in alliance command's.
If you don’t agree with the above, please feel free to comment .
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:40
|
#7
|
Puppet Master
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 227
|
So sorry, I haven't payd much attention to AD the passed 6 months. Why I brought up this issue was because people argue about blocks on daily basis and I thought it would be good to clearify what is the definition for a block for new players aswell as the old vets cause clearly there are so many different opinions about this. Is there no definit definition for a block or is it totally opinion based? Anyone have a historical aspect of blocks outside PA context?
Quote:
Originally posted by sirad
theres been a lot better discussions with arguemnts on various sides debateing this issue if you think your treading new water your in the same fish pond. and as the stocks getting lower with the more attractive fishermen out there it wont really matter if the trout band withthe salmon and the bass band with the pirch because very soon that pond is going to be fished out.
figure it out
|
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:46
|
#8
|
Paranoid Android
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hell
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Guran
So sorry, I haven't payd much attention to AD the passed 6 months. Why I brought up this issue was because people argue about blocks on daily basis and I thought it would be good to clearify what is the definition for a block for new players aswell as the old vets cause clearly there are so many different opinions about this. Is there no definit definition for a block or is it totally opinion based? Anyone have a historical aspect of blocks outside PA context?
|
WWII had The Allies, The Axis and the Russians, in the beginning the axis teamed up the Russians and created the first block, the axis, thinking they were winning turned on the Russians. The Russians then teamed up with the allies and kicked the bum of the Axis. After the war the Russians swallowed up half of Europe and created the Soviet Block. The allies Created the Nato Block to oppose it.
__________________
God loves his children
[SiN]
Safety in Numbers
NEVER AGAIN! Retired
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:48
|
#9
|
what do you care...
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brooklyn Ny \o/
Posts: 42
|
I may be being controversial here, but the most accurate crude definition that comes to my mind as of late is : A group of alliances opposing yours which actually sound so formidable on paper you sh|t your pants posting on AD about them before signups even happen, hoping to have ppl chicken out of forming it. Happened the last few rounds including this round like clockwork. As a sidenote, it may also be used as a counter to one's own not quite public agenda of 'blocking' in the same manner, but since this 'block' was not announced first on AD it's not seen as evul but necessary . Then we have the ' My alliance didn't make the final cut so let me expose them' angle, and so the list goes on and on...
[/edit] as for 'appropiate' numbers for allied alliances we'd have to wait for signups for that, and then it's already too late as plans should be well in sorted by then [/edit]
There has only really been 1 authentic Powerblock seen in PA imho and it was a damn good one, so good ppl still scream bloody murder at anything remotely resembling it in relative power now. That's a totally different discussion altogether tho :/
__________________
Rza
Former Member
Ministry(HC), Xanadu(WingHC) and 1up (peon)
Last edited by wubanger; 10 Jan 2003 at 11:58.
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:49
|
#10
|
Boy without a toy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: #ducks
Posts: 506
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Blocks?
Quote:
Originally posted by -=Zyth=-
I make that about 600 players or 60 galaxies, Im not talking members here. Just what they control.
|
Well my alliance goes by strict policy to NOT mix with unalligned ppl...
Last edited by RooKie; 10 Jan 2003 at 11:57.
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 11:52
|
#11
|
Paranoid Android
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hell
Posts: 409
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Blocks?
Quote:
Originally posted by RooKie
Well my alliance goes by strict policy to NOT mix...
|
So its all Madcows? or...
__________________
God loves his children
[SiN]
Safety in Numbers
NEVER AGAIN! Retired
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 13:49
|
#13
|
[F.E.A.R.]
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,412
|
A 'block', in my opinion, is a group of alliances that would wipe the floor with every other alliance in the game if they were the only allied group.
__________________
"And when people tell me what is ok and what is not it should not be an unexpected scene seeing I extend my middle right hand digit and say: 'Eyy, would you like lemon or lime with that piece of advice, mister?'"
Funny Film Reviews :: SWOS
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 14:03
|
#14
|
Most unimportant guy...
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kvinesdal
Posts: 1,393
|
heh
The word 'powerblock' is in my opinion a group of alliances that together have a good chance of winning the round...
A block tho, is an alliance between 3 or more alliances working together(2 if they are really big) for common goals...not necessarily to win, but maybe to have better protection vs a powerblock
2 alliances together is a cooperation, or sumthing like that, as it aint really a block...
-Jonas
__________________
When we discover the centre of the universe, alot of people will be shocked and dissapointed to know that they are not it!
Retired
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 14:08
|
#15
|
H O N O U R
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 207
|
This argument is totaly wrong. People will believe what they want, so what is the point in having it?
Im my eyes a block is based on the amount of members, but due to alliances not actually giving their numbers (truthfully) out, then its impossible to really determine who is a block and who isnt.
So the only plausible way is on the amount of alliances that are allies... 3+ alliances i concider a block. Not specificly a powerblock but still a block.
Aneu
__________________
"Everyone dies, How you live is all that counts"
'True Power Is A State Of Mind'
Quote:
[22:27] ([ViruS]Aaranaf) your not Aneu
|
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 15:48
|
#16
|
Puppet Master
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 227
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aneu
This argument is totaly wrong. People will believe what they want, so what is the point in having it?
|
To get a picture of what people think?
I suppose you are used to discuss 'easy' subject's alone, without different opinions. :sarcasm:
|
|
|
10 Jan 2003, 16:31
|
#17
|
wasted
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Under the floorboards
Posts: 1,240
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Scouse
A 'block', in my opinion, is a group of alliances that would wipe the floor with every other alliance in the game if they were the only allied group.
|
This is probably the best practical definition of a block. There are other definitions, but this one really describes the kind of 'block' that most people are concerned with.
__________________
“They were totally confused,” said the birdman, whose flying suit gives him a passing resemblance to Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story. “The authorities said that I was an unregistered aircraft and to fly, you need a licence. I told them, ‘No. To fly, you need wings’.”
|
|
|
11 Jan 2003, 05:04
|
#18
|
Boy without a toy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: #ducks
Posts: 506
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aneu
This argument is totaly wrong. People will believe what they want, so what is the point in having it?
Im my eyes a block is based on the amount of members, but due to alliances not actually giving their numbers (truthfully) out, then its impossible to really determine who is a block and who isnt.
So the only plausible way is on the amount of alliances that are allies... 3+ alliances i concider a block. Not specificly a powerblock but still a block.
Aneu
|
how many players can we have then?
|
|
|
11 Jan 2003, 05:36
|
#19
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Blocks?
Quote:
Originally posted by -=Zyth=-
So its all Madcows? or...
|
You could at least try to be a bit more tactful in your selective quoting.
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
11 Jan 2003, 06:19
|
#20
|
Next Round
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 28
|
My opinion, nothing more
In Mathematics, two points make up a line...
Three points make up a plane.
Keeping that in mind, anytime we have two alliances teaming up, it is actually called an "alliance". PA just gets really confusing because we call groups or clans "alliances" to begin with.
In other games when two clans/squads/teams work together - it is called an alliance.
When three or more "alliances" work together, it is then considered a block. HOWEVER, the three alliances must be directly aligned with one another and not remotely.
For example, alliance A must be aligned with both B and C.
B must be aligned with both A and C and C must be aligned with both A and B. This is when you can rightfully call it a "block", just like a "plane" in mathetmatics.
If alliance C is alligned with A, who is separately aligned to B, but C has no relation with B... it is still not a block because C could still possibly be hostile towards B.
That is my opinion about blocks after 6 years of online gaming with almost a dozen different "communities". I realize i'm probably not going to change anyone's opinion about "what a block is"... but like I really care.
__________________
I've lost contact with everyone on PA, so send me a PM if you're a friend from many rounds ago
- WildCardz
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27.
| |