|
|
11 Apr 2003, 17:54
|
#1
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
So tell me Sakera
Have you removed all WEET protection from your farming galmember who is now hitting another planet in 39:7 ?
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Iuvat
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 17:56
|
#2
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Re: So tell me Sakera
Quote:
Originally posted by Knight Theamion
Have you removed all WEET protection from your farming galmember who is now hitting another planet in 39:7 ?
|
Why ask when you already know the answer
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:00
|
#3
|
God
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bilbao
Posts: 7
|
/me looks at a farmer in that gal...
i donīt see nothing...i think is better see ur gal...or donīt u want? ;D. the farmers think the rest are the same...
__________________
Proud to be Black Bull
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:07
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 460
|
we havent farmed, belive what u want, but tbh, i dont care
__________________
Alliance whore.
Attention Whore.
God.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:11
|
#5
|
Raaaaaaaah!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,296
|
"They didn't know it was illegal". It worked for Rabba therefore it should work for everyone else.
__________________
Hicks
Mercury & Solace
Always [Fury]
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:17
|
#6
|
SHW
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: @home
Posts: 228
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hicks
"They didn't know it was illegal". It worked for Rabba therefore it should work for everyone else.
|
Be careful... you are about to break your little glasshouse with that stone..
__________________
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.
SHW, ReBorn, Wolfpack, NoS, Eclipse, Ascendancy
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:20
|
#7
|
Raaaaaaaah!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,296
|
Quote:
Originally posted by -CP-
Be careful... you are about to break your little glasshouse with that stone..
|
In what way ? If Rabba can get away with farming why can't the rest of Planetarion ?
Why should anyone look down on Sakera's galaxy if they have farmed (Which I doubt they have as news scans are out) if Rabba can get away with it.
What does 39:7 have to do with anything ? :eek: Do elaberate Theamion, from what I'm told 39:7 hit 40:9 this morning ...
__________________
Hicks
Mercury & Solace
Always [Fury]
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:45
|
#8
|
Never say DIE!
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 24
|
*sighs*
__________________
Senater
Elysium HC
Ex-Cell HC
[Loyalty - Pride - Power]
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:46
|
#9
|
Bored
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: A Persistant Universe
Posts: 1,583
|
Quote:
Originally posted by -CP-
Be careful... you are about to break your little glasshouse with that stone..
|
We dont let hicks have stones. He gets soft rubber balls to play with.
__________________
Germania
Fury
Mercury & Solace
Conspiracy Theory, Wrath, 1up, ICD, Eclipse
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 18:55
|
#10
|
Angelus Mortis
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mount Doom
Posts: 109
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hicks
What does 39:7 have to do with anything ? :eek: Do elaberate Theamion, from what I'm told 39:7 hit 40:9 this morning ...
|
as quest?
40:9:6 launched first attack fleet yesterday afternoon (gmt time)
I just wondered if this was a retal cuz the target didnt even bother to get def (he was online and it was not a hard time to ask for def). And he was only a lil bit smaller then his attacker. Maybe someone from 40:9 can enlighten me about this.
Im just curious how they get roids this easy.
I wanna get them like that too
--------
11/04/03 04:33:39 We recalled a fleet defending - Lake Benacus - (51:4:1). It will be home in 7 hours.
10/04/03 21:17:21 We sent 787 ships to defend - Lake Benacus - (51:4:1). They will arrive in 7 hours.
10/04/03 20:55:06 A fleet with 1000 ships from =The Mother Goddess= has been recalled.
10/04/03 20:54:27 Our sensors have discovered a jumpgate opening in our sector. Expect company of 1000 hostile ships from =The Mother Goddess= ( 40:9:6 ) in 7 hours.
10/04/03 20:49:48 Our sensors have discovered a jumpgate opening in our sector. Expect company of 4680 hostile ships from =The Mother Goddess= ( 40:9:6 ) in 8 hours.
10/04/03 18:49:57 We recalled a fleet defending - Lake Benacus - (51:4:1). It will be home in 1 hour.
10/04/03 17:56:57 We sent 0 ships to defend - Lake Benacus - (51:4:1). They will arrive in 6 hours.
10/04/03 17:34:24 Our sensors have discovered a jumpgate opening in our sector. Expect company of 4740 hostile ships from =The Mother Goddess= ( 40:9:6 ) in 8 hours.
----
And Yes, I know, coords are bad
:e_chick:
__________________
r3 - n00b
r4 - 233:8:1 MI
r5 - 15:24:8 - Angelus Mortis of Mortem Expetere LuX/Wolfpack
r6 - 27:20:6 - Ignotus Milites of Non Omnis Moriar Wolfpack
r7 - 8:13:8 - Periculum In Mora of Aurora Musis Amica Wolfpack / allianceless / SnugglehBunnies
r8 - 22:5:4 Est quaedam flere voluptas of Hinc illae lacrimae Adelante / Fury / SnugglehBunnies
wc 1 - xx:yy:zz - ^Nuda veritas of Mirabile dictu^
wc 2 - 3:13:9 - Nox of Omnis una manet nox
r9 - 37:2:8 Nomen est omen of Somnium verum evadit Eclipse / SnugglehBunnies
r9.5 23:2:1 Multos timere debet of quem multi timent Elysium / SnugglehBunnies
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 20:37
|
#11
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
While 40:9 is known for 'stealing' retals who aren't even legitemate according to their own rules.
So Sakera, what do you plead ?
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Iuvat
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 20:38
|
#12
|
180š
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 397
|
who will accept a retal on a gal member when u are ranked 1 ??
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 20:40
|
#13
|
No, really...
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Out of my mind
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Knight Theamion
So Sakera, what do you plead ?
|
Ignorance.. It worked for rabba
__________________
Stomp ten peasants to achieve burnination
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 20:51
|
#14
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MadeMan
who will accept a retal on a gal member when u are ranked 1 ??
|
The point is, another HC SHOULD auth it or the rules of the alliance and the block are corrupted, Sakera shouldn't be allowed to rule over his own gal retal wise.
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Iuvat
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 21:08
|
#15
|
180š
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Knight Theamion
The point is, another HC SHOULD auth it or the rules of the alliance and the block are corrupted, Sakera shouldn't be allowed to rule over his own gal retal wise.
|
Yes a good point but do u think that sakera would let them go through on his galm8?
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 21:12
|
#16
|
Finn.. who's drunk.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 285
|
c'moon.. didn't ya guys read tzu's topic in this forum.. and u wonder.. where does those roids.. go.. when atleast half of gal is online.. and sakera doesn't know anything what's happening.. unless the gal members involved have telled him.. and btw all retals are farming.. if target moves and can't get def.. so there u go...
__________________
r2 Thieves
r3: top100(p0rks0da rox) r4: top400(excadrix, pcmaster+me=gal 99th) r5: top150(before giving up, nocex didn't rock) r6:evu and drunk dwarf (top50)
r7: wasted c27 gal, sucky luck in clus. r8: In real Finnish infantry.. 270days r9: boring round as hell
r9.5: Top60(small playerbase=easy)
Few won R's in PIA, r26 top15 First/Last Pax round.
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
10 lines max for signature I heard.. so
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 21:34
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LordNieminen
r9: 39:7, we decided who win this r.
|
__________________
Friedrich
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 21:41
|
#18
|
Free
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 71
|
Sakara's brain is too small to understand this conversation ;/
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 21:48
|
#19
|
Aes Elysium
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Fields of Gold
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LordNieminen
c'moon.. didn't ya guys read tzu's topic in this forum.. and u wonder.. where does those roids.. go.. when atleast half of gal is online.. and sakera doesn't know anything what's happening.. unless the gal members involved have telled him.. and btw all retals are farming.. if target moves and can't get def.. so there u go...
|
Please make an effort at getting at the right case at least,
someone attacked Sun_Tzus galaxy from a different galaxy,
NOT Sakeras.
So what exactly does your comment here mean?
Eylisia
__________________
Elysium [R3 - R10]
Retired Elysium HC
A Prayer for the Wild at Heart kept in Cages
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 21:49
|
#20
|
Divine
Join Date: May 2001
Location: i dunno where i am :(
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Silk_311x
Sakara's brain is too small to understand this conversation ;/
|
he is very cleaver i got all my knowledge from him :/
__________________
shak
Nosferatu
Silver
Elysium
RaH
Eclipse
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 21:49
|
#21
|
The one you love to hate!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Romania
Posts: 68
|
\o/ to all our attackers
GREAT WORK
keep it up. (especially for 13:7 bastards )
__________________
Honor is the reward of virtue!
______________________________
ex-Member of Elysium, VtS, Titans, Fury, Nos, FAnG, Angels, Daous Dava
Curent member of: Real Life
______________________________
Proud to be the one you love to hate!
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 22:00
|
#22
|
Condenación
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ..her lap
Posts: 200
|
__________________
R3: n00b
R4: 55:8:23 Selenia the Dark Angel of Urborg of Dominaria ( NoS)
R5: 24:12:5 MelAncholic Angel of Condemnation ( NoS)
R6: 21:5:10 Cursed Visionary of True Faith ( NoS)
R7: 9:19:9 Fragrance of Your Skin (NoS/ Bunnies)
R8: 3:5:4 Cursed Hands of Devotion (Fury/ Bunnies)
R9: 18:2:4 Infernal Memories of Humiliation ( Eclipse/Bunnies)
--------------------
MelAncholic
...criticism is the root of all progress
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 22:05
|
#23
|
Guest
|
Prince i suggest u take this info and act especially certain peopls forum sigs
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 22:19
|
#24
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
I wonder how many of those roids in that galaxy is farmed in one way or another.. 50%?
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 22:51
|
#25
|
The Nosferatu
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Smurf Village
Posts: 83
|
Well what to say? I have now been accused for being dumb, a farmer, everything you can read up here without having
time/chance to comment on it myself.
I will do this short, but from the start. A few days ago, as most of you heard, there was a hit on a Eclipse/Ely
gal done by allies, where 39:7 participated a GREAT deal. This his was done with mind to KILL and ROID the
Eclipse/Ely galaxy and the ONE and ONLY reason for the recall was a great deal of defence on all targets.
After this 13:7 decided to retal on 39:7. Roidruns. Not only once, but several times. In their eyes this was
ok because of the single attack on eclipse (No the attack wasnt on 13:7). My gal, 40:9 decided not to tolerate
that 13:7 could continue "farming" 39:7 and we launched our own retals against 39:7 for something that
normally wouldn't have been taken so hard, but under this circumstances we decided that this was reason enough.
We decided to retal the galaxy and we did so, contacted the planets in question and gave them ultimatum to
accept the retal or we would bash their whole galaxy down to nothing. Witch they accepted, and fleets where
sent from 40:9 as retal fleets, not farming fleets. Now, it's up to PA-HQ if they want to see retals as farming,
but they earlier haven't, and I dont think they should now either. We managed to dig up alot of violations done by
39:7 and followed with a few more fleets, witch by the way where real attack fleets because we did not auth it
with the members in question.
This is the whole story, and nothing but the truth.
When it comes to 39:7's sigs, it's not our problem that they decided to give up and express their anger
at both us and 13:7 by starting this "strategy". Would you really think they would do something like that
if they willingly got farmed by 40:9? oh comon......
Dreadnought> and retals are being requested
Sakera> to bad you wount get any )
Sakera> and thats a promise
Dreadnought> so your saying your gal can just flaunt what u take?
Dreadnought> you take retals but when u piggyback u cant be retalled?
Dreadnought> odd
Sakera> if they piggyback they will recal, so there will be no retals
to bad you missed the rest of the conversation, love.
Quote:
Originally posted by G.K Zhukov
I wonder how many of those roids in that galaxy is farmed in one way or another.. 50%?
|
We did not farm a single out of our roids.
__________________
Round 2: Somewhere in c7.
Round 3: 79:11:1 - Fx9
Round 4: 30:14:8 (Smurf Village) - Fx9/Elysium/Fury/NFU
Round 5: 21:4:1- Fury/NFU
Round 6: 27:13:3 - Silver/Elysium
Round 7: 21:21:11 - Elysium
Round 8: 45:7:4 - Elysium
Round 9: 40:9:1 - Farmer/abuser/blatant liar/providers doll
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:00
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 13
|
Re: So tell me Sakera
Quote:
Originally posted by Knight Theamion
Have you removed all WEET protection from your farming galmember who is now hitting another planet in 39:7 ?
|
nonono..you are badly wrong,we still have effective weet protection
[00:35] <Guran> Check of galaxy 39:7 on 11/04/2003 23:34
[00:35] <Guran> Attack Forbidden
[00:35] <Guran> Even if It contain Hostile
everyone that news scans our gal can see how usefull that line in arbiter is.
but no,sakera aint behind of these incs,he's just the guy who could have stopped all this **** happening to our gal
[11:22] <Sun_Tzu> should the whole thing be recalled?
[11:23] <Sakera> <Olrik> msg him to recall and check with his hc
[11:23] <Sakera> okz do it politely
[11:23] <Sakera> only your attacker
[11:23] <Sakera> rest is free to attack
[11:23] <Sun_Tzu> o.O
[11:23] <Sun_Tzu> WEET is allowed to attack WEET members? c'mon...
[11:24] <Sakera> not ely members
this is our dear sakera,good to have whole block-caring hcs \o/
__________________
----
owage [Ðragon]
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:07
|
#27
|
Imposter?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK / Canada
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sakera
Well what to say? I have now been accused for being dumb, a farmer, everything you can read up here without having
time/chance to comment on it myself.
I will do this short, but from the start. A few days ago, as most of you heard, there was a hit on a Eclipse/Ely
gal done by allies, where 39:7 participated a GREAT deal. This his was done with mind to KILL and ROID the
Eclipse/Ely galaxy and the ONE and ONLY reason for the recall was a great deal of defence on all targets.
After this 13:7 decided to retal on 39:7. Roidruns. Not only once, but several times. In their eyes this was
ok because of the single attack on eclipse (No the attack wasnt on 13:7). My gal, 40:9 decided not to tolerate
that 13:7 could continue "farming" 39:7 and we launched our own retals against 39:7 for something that
normally wouldn't have been taken so hard, but under this circumstances we decided that this was reason enough.
We decided to retal the galaxy and we did so, contacted the planets in question and gave them ultimatum to
accept the retal or we would bash their whole galaxy down to nothing. Witch they accepted, and fleets where
sent from 40:9 as retal fleets, not farming fleets. Now, it's up to PA-HQ if they want to see retals as farming,
but they earlier haven't, and I dont think they should now either. We managed to dig up alot of violations done by
39:7 and followed with a few more fleets, witch by the way where real attack fleets because we did not auth it
with the members in question.
This is the whole story, and nothing but the truth.
When it comes to 39:7's sigs, it's not our problem that they decided to give up and express their anger
at both us and 13:7 by starting this "strategy". Would you really think they would do something like that
if they willingly got farmed by 40:9? oh comon......
|
So if I understand correctly 13:7 (who many have evidence of using blatantly obvious multi-escort fleets anyway) repeatedly retalled 39:7 for attacking another Ecl/Ely galaxy.
Your galaxy (saints that you are) saw that 13:7 were repeatedly attacking an "allied" galaxy on behalf of another so you took their place and threatened a galaxy, that launched one attack on one allied galaxy and that had already been hit repeatedly because of it, that if they didn't allow your fleets to land without resistance you would level them to the ground?
Sounds to me as if your greed yet again got the better of your own rules, that for one mistake that galaxy was repeatedly attacked and then threatened to be levelled to the ground if your galaxy was not allowed to farm them. Why did your galaxies "retals" come with this threat and not the original "retals" or "retals" by the galaxy they attacked?
Seems this round is just full of HCs abusing their power for their own gain isn't it?
__________________
Æ - from the ashes of good intentions come forth lasting friendships... the Æternals.
R2: XXV
R3: Æternals
R4: Fx9/Wolfpack
R5: Legion
R6: Legion BC
R7: Legion BC
R8: RaH BC
R9: RaH HC
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:22
|
#28
|
The Nosferatu
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Smurf Village
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Maddix
So if I understand correctly 13:7 (who many have evidence of using blatantly obvious multi-escort fleets anyway) repeatedly retalled 39:7 for attacking another Ecl/Ely galaxy.
Your galaxy (saints that you are) saw that 13:7 were repeatedly attacking an "allied" galaxy on behalf of another so you took their place and threatened a galaxy, that launched one attack on one allied galaxy and that had already been hit repeatedly because of it, that if they didn't allow your fleets to land without resistance you would level them to the ground?
Sounds to me as if your greed yet again got the better of your own rules, that for one mistake that galaxy was repeatedly attacked and then threatened to be levelled to the ground if your galaxy was not allowed to farm them. Why did your galaxies "retals" come with this threat and not the original "retals" or "retals" by the galaxy they attacked?
Seems this round is just full of HCs abusing their power for their own gain isn't it?
|
We where unhappy seing this happened and decided to dip the toe in the water to see how hot it was.
__________________
Round 2: Somewhere in c7.
Round 3: 79:11:1 - Fx9
Round 4: 30:14:8 (Smurf Village) - Fx9/Elysium/Fury/NFU
Round 5: 21:4:1- Fury/NFU
Round 6: 27:13:3 - Silver/Elysium
Round 7: 21:21:11 - Elysium
Round 8: 45:7:4 - Elysium
Round 9: 40:9:1 - Farmer/abuser/blatant liar/providers doll
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:29
|
#29
|
Imposter?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK / Canada
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sakera
We where unhappy seing this happened and decided to dip the toe in the water to see how hot it was.
|
Unhappy that this galaxy was being bashed by 13:7 or unhappy that 13:7 were getting all the roids?
__________________
Æ - from the ashes of good intentions come forth lasting friendships... the Æternals.
R2: XXV
R3: Æternals
R4: Fx9/Wolfpack
R5: Legion
R6: Legion BC
R7: Legion BC
R8: RaH BC
R9: RaH HC
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:32
|
#30
|
Blood
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The States that are United
Posts: 424
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sakera
After this 13:7 decided to retal on 39:7. Roidruns. Not only once, but several times. In their eyes this was
ok because of the single attack on eclipse (No the attack wasnt on 13:7). My gal, 40:9 decided not to tolerate
that 13:7 could continue "farming" 39:7 and we launched our own retals against 39:7 for something that
normally wouldn't have been taken so hard, but under this circumstances we decided that this was reason enough.
|
3 planets from 13:7 sent out counters while 39:7 was attacking an Eclipse HC gal and you call that farming, heh. (And only 1 landed)
If you'd bothered to news scan you'd see we haven't launched at 39:7 since that counter until today after you guys decided you needed some easy roids.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:34
|
#31
|
Blood
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The States that are United
Posts: 424
|
@Maddix and Sakera, news scan and see where our roids (not many) have been coming from the past few days.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:36
|
#32
|
Imposter?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK / Canada
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Iceaxe
3 planets from 13:7 sent out counters while 39:7 was attacking an Eclipse HC gal and you call that farming, heh. (And only 1 landed)
If you'd bothered to news scan you'd see we haven't launched at 39:7 since that counter until today after you guys decided you needed some easy roids.
|
So he's talking crap about the whole "13:7 repeatedly retalling 39:7" thing?
Tsk tsk Sakera, lying and abusing your position to farm allied galaxies are we now? Here was me thinking only Wolfpack HC were dirty - how silly of me
__________________
Æ - from the ashes of good intentions come forth lasting friendships... the Æternals.
R2: XXV
R3: Æternals
R4: Fx9/Wolfpack
R5: Legion
R6: Legion BC
R7: Legion BC
R8: RaH BC
R9: RaH HC
|
|
|
11 Apr 2003, 23:58
|
#33
|
The Nosferatu
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Smurf Village
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Maddix
So he's talking crap about the whole "13:7 repeatedly retalling 39:7" thing?
Tsk tsk Sakera, lying and abusing your position to farm allied galaxies are we now? Here was me thinking only Wolfpack HC were dirty - how silly of me
|
ns 39:7 now and see who's landing again.
__________________
Round 2: Somewhere in c7.
Round 3: 79:11:1 - Fx9
Round 4: 30:14:8 (Smurf Village) - Fx9/Elysium/Fury/NFU
Round 5: 21:4:1- Fury/NFU
Round 6: 27:13:3 - Silver/Elysium
Round 7: 21:21:11 - Elysium
Round 8: 45:7:4 - Elysium
Round 9: 40:9:1 - Farmer/abuser/blatant liar/providers doll
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:08
|
#34
|
Blood
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The States that are United
Posts: 424
|
The discussion isn't about now though, its about why you decided you needed 39:7's roids. Your claims that my gal was farming 39:7 are clearly not true (news scans are amazing things)...
Oh and its not "again" its "for the first time."
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:15
|
#35
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
tread lightly Sakera, I could probably get half your gal deleted, you're just lucky you've got Foxman that I set up for you and that I like, don't wanna ruin his round because his gal-m8s are piss-ants...
oh yeah, and corzi is cool Owage p0weria
ps. The reason I recalled(on 40:9) was that I heard the attack wasn't authed, this is also why I forced my gal m8s to recall, if you choose to call me a liar, go ahead, anyone that knows me knows I'm not the one that tends to lie, and my morals are too strict to question such an order. Go ask the UW-community or my old gal-m8s, they know what kind of an player I am, much more so than your 1minute analyses on a roid-hungry stomach...
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:18
|
#36
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Iceaxe
The discussion isn't about now though, its about why you decided you needed 39:7's roids. Your claims that my gal was farming 39:7 are clearly not true (news scans are amazing things)...
Oh and its not "again" its "for the first time."
|
indeed, 13:7 landed once, Hardcastle for 2 ticks, un-authed, un-justified, but none the less it stopped there. Anything further would have met such defence it'd be silly, since by now we had learnt not to trust HC's or alliances.
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:31
|
#37
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sakera
.. I have now been accused for being dumb, a farmer, everything you can read up here without having
time/chance to comment on it myself ...
.
|
With all words that follow the above quoted statement you confirm to be just what you have been accused of. If the facts don't support your position why reveal them ? :/
__________________
Friedrich
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:31
|
#38
|
Blood
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The States that are United
Posts: 424
|
Actually I never even bothered to newsie, Eclipse HC told me to pull so I did, had nothing to do with whether you had def or not. Can't speak for my 3rd gal mate though.
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:36
|
#39
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Iceaxe
Actually I never even bothered to newsie, Eclipse HC told me to pull so I did, had nothing to do with whether you had def or not. Can't speak for my 3rd gal mate though.
|
yes, I know, you were the one attacking me you bitch :P
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:38
|
#40
|
Blood
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The States that are United
Posts: 424
|
I know, and it was a counter not a true attack.
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:42
|
#41
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Iceaxe
I know, and it was a counter not a true attack.
|
counters are recalled when the countered planets recall(within alliance/block atleast)... :/
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:44
|
#42
|
Raaaaaaaah!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,296
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sun_Tzu
counters are recalled when the countered planets recall(within alliance/block atleast)... :/
|
Depends if the planet being countered is attacking an allied HC galaxy to try and make a bid to win the round.
__________________
Hicks
Mercury & Solace
Always [Fury]
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:46
|
#43
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hicks
Depends if the planet being countered is attacking an allied HC galaxy to try and make a bid to win the round.
|
oh, yes, taking down a galaxy with less roids(and less capacity to grow) than mine had is a bid at winning the round... idd Hicks, you are a strategical genius...
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:48
|
#44
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sakera
After this 13:7 decided to retal on 39:7. Roidruns. Not only once, but several times. In their eyes this was
ok because of the single attack on eclipse (No the attack wasnt on 13:7). My gal, 40:9 decided not to tolerate
that 13:7 could continue "farming" 39:7 and we launched our own retals against 39:7 for something that
normally wouldn't have been taken so hard, but under this circumstances we decided that this was reason enough.
We decided to retal the galaxy and we did so, contacted the planets in question and gave them ultimatum to
accept the retal or we would bash their whole galaxy down to nothing. Witch they accepted, and fleets where
sent from 40:9 as retal fleets, not farming fleets.
|
Read that...now, read it again. Sakera, WTF is up with that? Maddix is completely correct, your greed took over this time. This aint what a HC should do, you, as a HC work for your members, they dont work for you.
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:56
|
#45
|
Autonomous
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 125
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sun_Tzu
tread lightly Sakera, I could probably get half your gal deleted, you're just lucky you've got Foxman that I set up for you and that I like, don't wanna ruin his round because his gal-m8s are piss-ants...
|
Your a cheater, but i wont report you because your my friend.
R7 redux i guess
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 00:58
|
#46
|
Raaaaaaaah!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,296
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sun_Tzu
oh, yes, taking down a galaxy with less roids(and less capacity to grow) than mine had is a bid at winning the round... idd Hicks, you are a strategical genius...
|
Dragons (Along with you) hit Rob's galaxy in an attempt to win the round by provoking Eclipse into striking back at Wolfpack starting a war. Wolfpack would have then called Eclipse back stabbers and got Elysium to side with them hence winning the round. Unfortunately Dragons being Dragons managed to hit an Elysium member and get owned in the process. WHICH IS WHY THE COUNTER WAS ALLOWED TO LAND.
__________________
Hicks
Mercury & Solace
Always [Fury]
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 01:12
|
#47
|
Xanadu
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Camelot
Posts: 456
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Alastor
Read that...now, read it again. Sakera, WTF is up with that? Maddix is completely correct, your greed took over this time. This aint what a HC should do, you, as a HC work for your members, they dont work for you.
|
sakera = :e_chick:
__________________
LDK s|ut
[23:33] <@Divine> hmm I think I may have a new GF aswell
[23:33] <@Divine> but dunno yet if I want a new GF so early in the round
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 01:15
|
#48
|
never
Join Date: May 2001
Location: #dammit
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hicks
Dragons (Along with you) hit Rob's galaxy in an attempt to win the round by provoking Eclipse into striking back at Wolfpack starting a war. Wolfpack would have then called Eclipse back stabbers and got Elysium to side with them hence winning the round. Unfortunately Dragons being Dragons managed to hit an Elysium member and get owned in the process. WHICH IS WHY THE COUNTER WAS ALLOWED TO LAND.
|
Seems a pretty bad plan from Dragons if true, surely Elysium would realize Dragons hit Rob's galaxy first thus making the backstabbing of Eclipse invalid? Or were there other events prior to Dragons hitting Rob's galaxy which you're not mentioning here? Plus if that was indeed the plan both WP & Ely would have been aware of it and so I hardly think the 1 Ely member being hit would have made a difference in that case (both WP & Ely wanting the war). Or am I missing something else?
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 01:18
|
#49
|
SHW
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: @home
Posts: 228
|
I wonder how many weet protected gals you guys have taken roids from this round sakera.. You took a few from mine, while we were threatened that if we defended (a wolfpack member who had done nothing wrong by the way) we would be leveled to the ground..
__________________
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.
SHW, ReBorn, Wolfpack, NoS, Eclipse, Ascendancy
|
|
|
12 Apr 2003, 01:29
|
#50
|
NewDawn pe0n
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: #NewDawn
Posts: 313
|
It's so fun seeing who can get the most retals Just like the good old farming races...
(/me waves at cbk)
__________________
NewDawn
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21.
| |