|
|
16 Feb 2012, 16:09
|
#201
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
If you bothered to read my post i was addressing the HC of xvx, in which, never stated he offered an agreement out at all and told us on these forums with this speech found below: (and i quote)
'I get approached about hitting ult a couple times, i decline since we averaged over 80 hostile fleets per day from ct/fang/nd since protection ended. Round drags on, we're in the lead(roids, value, score). I get approached again to hit ult, now by more alliances, i say i wont get involved in a gangbang of that scale(at this point we've recieved 2k hostile incs from fang/ct/nd/dlr/app/ult). The next night we get that gangbang instead, goes on for a couple days and we nap Ult ingame during this'
So.. this is WHY i brought it up again as i was addressing the xvx HC who claimed he declined the block, when in reality, they offered an agreement to the block which was declined. Was i addressing you? No. So my point (even if i keep repeating myself) was valid. Just becuase you fail to grasp the point or choose to ignore it isnt my problem. Unless your an xvx HC (in which my post was directed too with an obvious question in it) feel free to shut up?
|
and my point is that all of this has already been mentioned so many times already, whether you are addressing the xVx HC or not, find something new to bitch and whine about, that shouldn't be too hard for you
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
16 Feb 2012, 17:23
|
#202
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
Doesn't necessarily make it the right tactic to use on an alliance tho. And clearly it wasn't the right tactic this time either, as it backfired and sent xVx straight into the obviously open arms of Ult.
|
I never said it was a good tactic just pointing out it isnt new neither will it be the last time we see it been used
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
Should they have wanted to go for first? definitely! Does that mean they have to join a block whenever a block desires, or are they free to choose their own tactic, and their own timetable to achieve this?
|
Then how else are they going to achieve it? They have proven already they couldnt out roid Ultores (of course xvx were first before Ultores over took them) so unless they hit them (and with the skill of Ultores xvx would never be able to take them down 1 vs 1) so im unsure as to how else xvx were going to take first without joining a group to hit Ultores.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
|
Well no that isnt what i meant. If an alliance doesnt want to be a top contender for first i dont see the point in recruiting too its full capacity (or creating a second tag for that matter)
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
16 Feb 2012, 17:25
|
#203
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
and my point is that all of this has already been mentioned so many times already, whether you are addressing the xVx HC or not, find something new to bitch and whine about, that shouldn't be too hard for you
|
And i will keep bitching about it till somone from xvx (a HC hence why i addressed one) can tell me if its false or not. Ignoring me hoping i will shut up isnt the right tactic, might be good for trying to keep your head down in PA but doesnt work on the forums and especially with me. Although gm has already shed some light on the situation which to me amuses me even more.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
16 Feb 2012, 19:38
|
#204
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Ultores
Word on the Grapevine is that xvx are now defending v ultores now
Any truth to the matter?
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
16 Feb 2012, 20:52
|
#205
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
so you saying FAnG should of napped xvx and ults and taken the cowards way out? Kaiba you are a troll and have no idea what your talking about!
|
Actually no i just meant fang shouldnt have been in the fail-a-block that CT always sets up - its going really well for you!!!
And Colt i just honestly would have presumed that by tick 300 FaNG would have realised they were in a stronger position than they expected and would have changed there plans from 'were just starting out again' to 'hey we have a chance of doing really really well here!!'
If i had been FaNG HC i would have offered xVx only a 2v1 against Ultores - CT/ND this round are just free roids - no point in napping them tbh - they have no bite - i think FaNG + xVx vs. Ultores would have been a worthy battle and one xVx would have gone for more than CT's lame/same old 'let get f*cking everyone to smash #1 even tho only about 40% of us will actually raid' bullshit
|
|
|
16 Feb 2012, 21:58
|
#206
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Actually no i just meant fang shouldnt have been in the fail-a-block that CT always sets up - its going really well for you!!!
And Colt i just honestly would have presumed that by tick 300 FaNG would have realised they were in a stronger position than they expected and would have changed there plans from 'were just starting out again' to 'hey we have a chance of doing really really well here!!'
If i had been FaNG HC i would have offered xVx only a 2v1 against Ultores - CT/ND this round are just free roids - no point in napping them tbh - they have no bite - i think FaNG + xVx vs. Ultores would have been a worthy battle and one xVx would have gone for more than CT's lame/same old 'let get f*cking everyone to smash #1 even tho only about 40% of us will actually raid' bullshit
|
Who says we didn't change our "plans" when we were confronted with what our members were or weren't capable of...
We were 4th at said time, yet its down to us to "offer" xVx (our top hostile by FAR) an incentive for them to grasp #1??
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
16 Feb 2012, 22:11
|
#207
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: Ultores
well... from how attacks have gone both alliances are pretty equal i would say... it could have made 1st place a 3 way fight
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 01:33
|
#208
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 383
|
Re: Ultores
3 way fight?
who would be the third kaiba..... (lol)
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 11:35
|
#209
|
...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 146
|
Re: Ultores
xvx + fang would just about make it a fair fight if it had happened. Although as it stands now its a losing battle. More alarming is the state of the block vs Ultores quality wise....
As it stands according to intel i have Ultores have 34 planets in the top100 with 26 of that in the top50. FanG/ND/CT/DLR/APP can only muster 45 total in the top100 thats pretty sad. This doesnt even count value where again ultores have a major lead.
Given that every other alliance in PA knows the threat that ultores bring to the uni how on earth were they allowed to build such a lead. Even if xvx and FanG had have combined ultores still would have been a head. Why in PA do all other alliances take a reactive approach to dealing with ultores. It has been the same with app/asc/1up/eXi/denial whoever else has won more than 1 round. Every round it happens at about tick 400 someone makes a forum post saying we should roid #1 then about tick 600 everyone decides yeah we should lets do it by that time its all too late having spent half the round avoiding #1's forts for fear of retaliation. ( dont bull shit me that BCs havnt avoided ult forts early round this round)
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 15:23
|
#210
|
Jazz Maverick
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 333
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebos
Given that every other alliance in PA knows the threat that ultores bring to the uni how on earth were they allowed to build such a lead.
|
In a lot of cases its probably simply because the idea of having to cooperate with some of the other alliances is more distasteful than Ultores winning.
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 15:30
|
#211
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
835 Ultores and FAnG have confirmed they are allied.
|
I see FAnG agrees to the value xVx's tactic beholds and decided to start play alike... Makes some of the stuff being said on here quite funny.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 15:35
|
#212
|
Bolivian Alpaca
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
I see FAnG agrees to the value xVx's tactic beholds and decided to start play alike... Makes some of the stuff being said on here quite funny.
|
Maybe some alliance's plans to avoid incs backfired?
__________________
"I throw myself into the sea, release the wave, let it wash over me ..."
MadCowS - Angels - eXilition - Destiny - Wolfpack - Jenova - p3nguins
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 15:50
|
#213
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: Ultores
we all knew hitting ults was futile, at least fang gave it a try but now they have to look towards what their own goals are for the rest of the round.
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 16:15
|
#214
|
Bolivian Alpaca
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
we all knew hitting ults was futile, at least fang gave it a try but now they have to look towards what their own goals are for the rest of the round.
|
I take it you mean 'hitting ult while xvx remains allied to them was futile'
__________________
"I throw myself into the sea, release the wave, let it wash over me ..."
MadCowS - Angels - eXilition - Destiny - Wolfpack - Jenova - p3nguins
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 17:12
|
#215
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: Ultores
So why are 4 out of the top 5 alliances allied to another? Is there competition or something to worry about?
This is pretty lame/sad/pointless/you call it.
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 17:14
|
#216
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: Ultores
Better not be CT as one of those 4 out of 5
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 17:44
|
#217
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: Ultores
Personaly im dissapointed in my own alliance allying with Ultores. Especially after all the comments i made on here and we have also taken the easy way out.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 18:02
|
#218
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: Ultores
lol
....
lol
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 18:03
|
#219
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: Ultores
personally, i hope fang dies horribly .. really horribly.. this has been the most funniest turn i could have imagined
and ppl are calling xvx different names.. lol
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 19:08
|
#220
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: Ultores
in reality its the only sensible thing for fang to do - ct have died/given up and dlr/app have got bored so they were kinda on there own (let down by their block), if they didnt stop hitting Ult and get a nap they would have been raped for last few ticks.
Sensible move for FaNG to protect its intrests
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 19:33
|
#221
|
ToF
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 607
|
Re: Ultores
soooo...let me just get this straight. xvx nap with ult rather than go for the win, then get a little gangbang. then the block starts hitting ult, it what was always going to be futile. fang starts moving up quite well through the ranks. fang then nap ult meaning ults almost round long buddy is now gonna get hit by the block and fang do not have to fear retals from ult.
kudos to ult, now u have no enemies that can be bother and ur round long buddies are gonna get butt raped so fang can get second. lmfao.
__________________
[19:10] <coffee-> dont worry about Reincarnate he is an angry man
R1 - 9 none | R10.5 - 13 [ToF] | R14 [Reunion] | R15-17 [Subh] | R18 - 36 PA vacation | R37 [Evo] | R38 [NFI] | R39 & 40 [ToF] | R41 [Omega] | R42 - 47 [ToF][HC]
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 19:41
|
#222
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: Ultores
?
what is this ?
edit: that was for rein`s post
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 19:43
|
#223
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: Ultores
Same round long buddies who have been defending you against the block??
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 19:45
|
#224
|
ToF
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 607
|
Re: Ultores
what i am saying is xvx have helped out ult by not joining the block. now ult have napped fang meaning fang can get help to hit xvx and ult cant hit fang back. seems like a bit of a betrayal by ult.
__________________
[19:10] <coffee-> dont worry about Reincarnate he is an angry man
R1 - 9 none | R10.5 - 13 [ToF] | R14 [Reunion] | R15-17 [Subh] | R18 - 36 PA vacation | R37 [Evo] | R38 [NFI] | R39 & 40 [ToF] | R41 [Omega] | R42 - 47 [ToF][HC]
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 19:58
|
#225
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: Ultores
I guess Ult didn't like the fact xVx are going round saying they hope the round is boring for others
I would call it karma
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 20:36
|
#226
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reincarnate
what i am saying is xvx have helped out ult by not joining the block. now ult have napped fang meaning fang can get help to hit xvx and ult cant hit fang back. seems like a bit of a betrayal by ult.
|
Just short of dropping the nap with xVx I couldn't think of a better way of saying
You have taken too many liberties.
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 23:02
|
#227
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I guess Ult didn't like the fact xVx are going round saying they hope the round is boring for others
I would call it karma
|
I have it on good authority it is mostly caused by some xVx trying to protect a galwin by defending an App(with whom xVx has been napped for a while) from his Ult incs.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
17 Feb 2012, 23:43
|
#228
|
Inquisitor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 2,207
|
Re: Ultores
Forest causing trouble again?
Someone invite me to be Chief Executive and I'll declare war.
__________________
----------
That uniform you're wearing
So hot I cant stop staring.
Zhil
[Spore] Executive
[1up]
[Fury]
Inquisitorial Lord Protector of His Emperor's Glorius Empire
[20:19:04] <mazzelaar> I have to say a big up to Zhil - without those 8 def calls you covered we would've been screwed. | r12 End Ceremony
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 00:45
|
#229
|
xVx Peon
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Coventry
Posts: 268
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
Personaly im dissapointed in my own alliance allying with Ultores. Especially after all the comments i made on here and we have also taken the easy way out.
|
Good, pipe down. And know the facts in future before trolling on AD!
__________________
VisioN
xVx
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 08:35
|
#230
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: Ultores
All fang planets gonna end t10 now fearless is my idol i luv him ur greatest pa player ever!
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 08:57
|
#231
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary
Good, pipe down. And know the facts in future before trolling on AD!
|
My facts were right your still spinless just my alliance now joined you.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 09:52
|
#232
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Ultores
Now what xVx? What's your plan?
Didnt see this one comming.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 11:18
|
#233
|
xVx Peon
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Coventry
Posts: 268
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
My facts were right your still spinless just my alliance now joined you.
|
Pot, kettle black douchebag.
__________________
VisioN
xVx
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 11:48
|
#234
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary
Pot, kettle black douchebag.
|
How so? Difference is im not defending FAnG for allieing with Ultores (you lot did defend your allies actions) Yes im annoyed at it but guess in a way its good for us due to now Ultores cant hit us back, but we can hit you, as many others have already pointed out on this page already.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 14:07
|
#235
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary
Pot, kettle black douchebag.
|
Not really, we went after Ultores even though odds were against us, something you weren't prepared to do....unfortunately there comes a point where you have to stop beating your head against a wall and take action on other matters of unfinished business...
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 14:28
|
#236
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: Ultores
I am guessing that xVx are the unfinished business
|
|
|
18 Feb 2012, 16:00
|
#237
|
General (Adjective Army)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
|
Re: Ultores
I hope that they are.
I'd be prepared to spend the next two rounds hitting no one but xVx until we get them to disband. The whole bunch of them are nothing but a waste of accounts.
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 00:59
|
#238
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Ultores
Im waiting for Chimpie to come back posting
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 01:03
|
#239
|
xVx Peon
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Coventry
Posts: 268
|
Re: Ultores
You wont get it tonight, he is currently throwing up in his bathroom.
RL > PA
__________________
VisioN
xVx
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 12:16
|
#240
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Ultores
Seems xVx went that step too far and word on the grapevine xVx are getting raped off ULT
Any truth?
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 12:40
|
#241
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
Seems xVx went that step too far and word on the grapevine xVx are getting raped off ULT
Any truth?
|
xVx broke off the nap, so i guess it was ult that went a step too far...
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 12:54
|
#242
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Ultores
Shame how that doesn't quite fit into the narrative you've so transparently been trying to sell us, Paisley.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 12:58
|
#243
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Shame how that doesn't quite fit into the narrative you've so transparently been trying to sell us, Paisley.
|
All I am saying is ... Mission accomplished
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 13:46
|
#244
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Ultores
Yes, I can see how your attempts at painting xVx in a certain light, in order for Ultores to drop their nap with them, must've been the main reason for something else happening instead. It makes perfect sense.
In bizarro land.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 16:21
|
#245
|
Planetarion Forum Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,289
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
In bizarro land.
|
AD is by definition Bizarro Land.
__________________
Romans 10:9-10
#strategy
|
|
|
19 Feb 2012, 20:14
|
#246
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monroe
AD is by definition Bizarro Land.
|
There is method in the madness I assure you
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
20 Feb 2012, 00:39
|
#247
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Yes, I can see how your attempts at painting xVx in a certain light, in order for Ultores to drop their nap with them, must've been the main reason for something else happening instead. It makes perfect sense.
In bizarro land.
|
Nobody has tryed to make xVx anymore bad than theyve been.
Its too late to drop the nap with Ultores when theyve allready won the round.
If i were in xVx i would be pissed on my HCs for putting the alliance is such politcal mess as they have this round.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
20 Feb 2012, 05:24
|
#248
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
xVx broke off the nap, so i guess it was ult that went a step too far...
|
Wrong. xVx were breaching the terms of the agreement.
|
|
|
20 Feb 2012, 12:14
|
#249
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 386
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Wrong. xVx were breaching the terms of the agreement.
|
lol, what a dumb alliance. First they're tits and hand Ult the win, then they can't even keep to terms so they get something out of it
Didn't xVx learn a few rounds back that it's not good to not honour deals? Oh wait no, they thought it's a good thing to do and that it never bites back
__________________
Adapt has never been an official ND HC. He was on his way to promotion for some reason, but then got denied promotion. Lol at the muppet claiming he has been
|
|
|
20 Feb 2012, 15:26
|
#250
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Wrong. xVx were breaching the terms of the agreement.
|
Curious, since we only ever mentioned not deffing ct, what agreement were broken? Maybe Buly knows, he seems well informed?
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02.
| |