Re: Round 36 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
I have to admit that I am pro that. Every race having fico pods simply doesn't work.
|
good way to get rid of the newbs thou.. to let them go for fi/co if future stats are anything like current ones. Only reason to go fi/co this round was basically the fact that so many others went for it, so you had to be strong anti-fi/co but in reality u suck completely in anti-fi/co defence if it's your attacking fleet at the overrall picture.
Still can't believe the ridiculous amount of people who builded their anti-bs in fr/de class ships without having de attack fleet. I wonder when people will learn to read stats and actually get a grip, they have had enough rounds already to learn how to read them.. seems like 4/5 players are more into theory than into how the fleets work vs eachother. Then again if everyone could read the stats and understand practical use of ships we would never have good and sucky fleet differences between players.
__________________
r2 Thieves
r3: top100(p0rks0da rox) r4: top400(excadrix, pcmaster+me=gal 99th) r5: top150(before giving up, nocex didn't rock) r6:evu and drunk dwarf (top50)
r7: wasted c27 gal, sucky luck in clus. r8: In real Finnish infantry.. 270days r9: boring round as hell
r9.5: Top60(small playerbase=easy)
Few won R's in PIA, r26 top15 First/Last Pax round.
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
10 lines max for signature I heard.. so
|