|
|
29 Oct 2004, 08:38
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
|
Rnd 1 FIGHT
LCH vs 1up im hearing rumors can anyone confirm this LCH seems to have lost alittle bit of roids and is 1up getting any help ? someone in the right position answer this questions no trolls just yelling stupid stuff plz kthx
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 08:51
|
#2
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
(08:32:24) * Now talking in #public
(08:32:24) * Topic is 'Defcalls pm Mario || 1up are at war with LCH. 1up members may NOT defend LCH ingalaxy if they aren't under attack themselves. So if there's LCH in 1up galaxies you want to hit ....'
"Rumours"?
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 09:05
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Nice bravo 1up own them King Makers =)
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 09:24
|
#4
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
I have a lot of respect for 1up, and I'm willing to offer my help to them should they need it, I'm sure any extra attack fleets on LCH are welcome
Good Luck 1up
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 09:29
|
#5
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
what`s significant is, what will MISTU`s stance be on this. We all know what side of the fence HR will be leaning towards.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 09:30
|
#6
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
I'd just like to say, that my statement is no way an indication of what ND will do. Personally though, I would like to help 1up, its a bold move to be alone against an alliance with 36 more members.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 10:12
|
#7
|
Stolen
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 487
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Woo, some action ahead…..jipeeeee
And The-Fish, stay out or you might burn your self.
__________________
Who, me?
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 10:16
|
#8
|
Newdawn ftw \o/
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 101
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
1up cant take on LCH all alone? So who is gonne support 1up? Will LCH get som help from the other allys? WHAT will become of the Universe, ahhhhh!
I see the Universe split up now.... wonder whose gonne take witch side, if they are gonne stand alone and so on. Starting flaming then gaming
I dont have LCH dudes in my gal, only 1up dudes and they 0wn I lend my support to them, after all in gal help and so on. I only speak for myself here now and not the entire ND ally.
Ether way, if its fo real 1up have declared war on LCH i wish both sides good luck.
__________________
[ND]olle
Proud to be in [NewDawn] - Member | DC | BC | Scanner
- Soaring where the angels fear to fly
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 10:35
|
#9
|
Stolen
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 487
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
A big No No,1!up are against blocking (they were the ones introducing it last round) So if LCH stays alone so will 1up.
At least is that my conclusion from reading these forums..?
__________________
Who, me?
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 10:55
|
#10
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Id also like to add well played to 1up. This round you are proving you are among the elite by showing no fear as you hit in the weight division above you. With this type of PR you will have every alliance asking you if u need help soon lol. Pld
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 11:22
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 26
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Who said they were alone in this?
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 11:56
|
#12
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
what`s significant is, what will MISTU`s stance be on this. We all know what side of the fence HR will be leaning towards.
|
heh, this morning has shown what side of the fence mistu decided to fall to
And Smokers, this has nothing to do with 1up being so brave to be the king makers ... They got owned in roids last night and their normal reaction now is to declare a war on those that declared a war on them. This is regular warfaring, nothing different.
gl to the parties involved and let's swap some roids
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:04
|
#13
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
Id also like to add well played to 1up. This round you are proving you are among the elite by showing no fear as you hit in the weight division above you. With this type of PR you will have every alliance asking you if u need help soon lol. Pld
|
What is so brave about them declaring war? What do you think they'd be doing? Do nothing and tollerate another alliance to roid them? Ofc they declared war because frankly there is nothing else to do really. Even if they have to do this all by themselves (which clearly isn't the case eventhough I'm not insinuating that they do coop attacks, but well, they seem to get support from other alliances with the same intentions), then this still isn't a brave move.
If 1up however would have done nothing, then it'd be rather retarded because that'd mean they allow others to roid them without consequences.
(this is not to degrade 1up, this post is just to show "some" pple that what is happening atm is just normal wayfare and is not something brave or unseen etc)
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:07
|
#14
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
/me looks at the lch fencesitters last round, doing, erm, fencesitting.
They did nothing \0/
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:26
|
#15
|
DarnocYzarc
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 303
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by MotoX
A big No No,1!up are against blocking (they were the ones introducing it last round) So if LCH stays alone so will 1up.
At least is that my conclusion from reading these forums..?
|
Do you really think 1up will go to war against LCH alone?
Why dont ND and HR join Absolute in helping them? :/
__________________
Member of Desse's ultimate pr0nstars
[1up]
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:31
|
#16
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
HR wont. But then again, HR are NAP`d with LCH, and have been for what, since round start now?
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:37
|
#17
|
Adelante
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 855
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
heh, this morning has shown what side of the fence mistu decided to fall to
And Smokers, this has nothing to do with 1up being so brave to be the king makers ... They got owned in roids last night and their normal reaction now is to declare a war on those that declared a war on them. This is regular warfaring, nothing different.
gl to the parties involved and let's swap some roids
|
We call ourself the coalition and we know Lch harbours terrorists. Lch and hr and other alliances make the Axis of Evil. They must and will be stopped.
But seriously 1up doesn't make blocks... Lch just opened up many fronts at once... Thev've been hiting absolute hard from start... Same with mistu etc.. And then they declared war on 1up.... And we shouldn't fight back cause it wouldn't be 1on1? 1up was the ones who came round 11 and said no more blocks, we are not the one too block, but the fact Lch been starting wars on all fronts doesn't mean 1up should just lie down and get rolled over just to be fair? Did Stalin just say... "heck.. just take Ukraine, wouldn't wanna be unfair..."
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:43
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyConrad
Do you really think 1up will go to war against LCH alone?
Why dont ND and HR join Absolute in helping them? :/
|
haha, are you insinuating that Absolute is working cooperatively with 1up, lol. If you haven't noticed the largest amount of "absolute bashing" done on these forums has been from people in 1up. If Absolute is attacking LCH it is from their own interests and not that of helping 1up.
As to 1up vs LCH, may the strongest alliance win. It will be interesting to see how the other alliances react. Whether they all try to gang up on the little one or whether they try to take out LCH who currently is probably too much for any one alliance to take out on their own.
Finally, it looks like there will be some interesting times ahead. I look forward to one of the most interesting rounds (politically, cause the stats are seriously screwed and there is no hope for terrans or xans this round, would be even more interesting if they would have come up with some decently balanced stats) in recent memory.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:44
|
#19
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storebo
We call ourself the coalition and we know Lch harbours terrorists. Lch and hr and other alliances make the Axis of Evil. They must and will be stopped.
But seriously 1up doesn't make blocks... Lch just opened up many fronts at once... Thev've been hiting absolute hard from start... Same with mistu etc.. And then they declared war on 1up.... And we shouldn't fight back cause it wouldn't be 1on1? 1up was the ones who came round 11 and said no more blocks, we are not the one too block, but the fact Lch been starting wars on all fronts doesn't mean 1up should just lie down and get rolled over just to be fair? Did Stalin just say... "heck.. just take Ukraine, wouldn't wanna be unfair..."
|
heh I agree, like I said: "this is NORMAL warfaring and has nothing to do with how brave 1up is"
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:47
|
#20
|
Sh33p h3rd3r
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 132
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
From what I hear and see its 1up/absolute/Mistu blocking against LCH. So much for 1up never blocking. What a joke. :P
__________________
Roiding No More
eXilitionAscendancy
*****************
Do not make me get out the paddle!!! "
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 12:52
|
#21
|
a simple pe0n
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: holland
Posts: 226
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helix
If Absolute is attacking LCH it is from their own interests and not that of helping 1up.
|
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 13:05
|
#22
|
DarnocYzarc
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 303
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helix
haha, are you insinuating that Absolute is working cooperatively with 1up, lol. If you haven't noticed the largest amount of "absolute bashing" done on these forums has been from people in 1up. If Absolute is attacking LCH it is from their own interests and not that of helping 1up.
As to 1up vs LCH, may the strongest alliance win. It will be interesting to see how the other alliances react. Whether they all try to gang up on the little one or whether they try to take out LCH who currently is probably too much for any one alliance to take out on their own.
Finally, it looks like there will be some interesting times ahead. I look forward to one of the most interesting rounds (politically, cause the stats are seriously screwed and there is no hope for terrans or xans this round, would be even more interesting if they would have come up with some decently balanced stats) in recent memory.
|
I never said Absolute was cooperating with 1up but if several alliances consentrate all their attacking strength on one alliance that is indirect blocking wheter they have joint attacks or not.
__________________
Member of Desse's ultimate pr0nstars
[1up]
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 13:07
|
#23
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Oh please, don`t stroke your own egos. MISTU are not singularly concentrating their efforts on you. I`d expect them to be leeching roids from 1up & LCH to further their own aims to win the round.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 13:11
|
#24
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
gl to both sides, may the best side win etc :>
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 13:13
|
#25
|
fanboy
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 492
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
This is the way fluent politics works, if LCH has been stupid enough to concentrate on roiding 2 major alliances in 2 nights, that's their own mess, and shouldn't expect anything but retaliation back from both of them.
That MISTU joins the bandwagon and roids LCH is not very likely, neither is it very clever. I'm quite sure MISTU will be roiding 1up and Absolute for easy roids, hoping to get far enough to ahead while the others battle it out.
__________________
Ascendancy, former [ 1UP] & Ministry.
FOUNDER OF THE OFFICIAL ASCENDANCY LADY GAGA FAN CLUB
ASCENDANCY DEMOLITION MAN
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 13:15
|
#26
|
Cabeza Coder
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 212
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
I see LCH didn't do good today....
And no, 1Up isnt blocking with anyone.
Just...weaker ppl targetting the the better one before it is too late.
__________________
Lockhead
Developer, Solutions Architect, DevOps Engineer
lockhead.net
Quote:
Round 24 Conspiracy HC Comment at my planet
<Germania> 4.9.1
<Germania> hes our top hostile
|
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 14:07
|
#27
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 642
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
yey! Bring out the big guns, this should be fun :-)
__________________
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most
-Elysium Officer
[1up] Senior MO
Retired
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 14:42
|
#28
|
Adelante
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 855
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyConrad
I never said Absolute was cooperating with 1up but if several alliances consentrate all their attacking strength on one alliance that is indirect blocking wheter they have joint attacks or not.
|
If Lch wasn't so greedy they would take down 1 alliance at the time, and not try to hit everyone.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 14:43
|
#29
|
Adelante
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 855
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockhead
I see LCH didn't do good today....
And no, 1Up isnt blocking with anyone.
Just...weaker ppl targetting the the better one before it is too late.
|
Yeah... Lch, mistu, vision etc... did the same towards us last round when we where on top... Brought Lch up as #1 ally for a time.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 17:08
|
#30
|
De aroma komt je tegemoet
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Greed? Bravery?
Its just a war game. Now space is on fire and it should be on fire. Give them hell guys. May the best alliance win.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 17:48
|
#31
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
HR wont. But then again, HR are NAP`d with LCH, and have been for what, since round start now?
|
Oh, pld on the intell there, i am blinded by your sh1t stirring \o/
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 18:02
|
#32
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
are you denying your NAP with LCH? Ofcourse last time I checked, it was actually about 3-4 days ago, you may have dropped it now, but we both know, you were* nap`d.
*probably still are.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 18:31
|
#33
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 642
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Im shocked, alliances denying relations on AD! Stop the press..
Oh, wait...
__________________
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most
-Elysium Officer
[1up] Senior MO
Retired
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 18:35
|
#34
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockhead
Just...weaker ppl targetting the the better one before it is too late.
|
wasn't this what the same ppl were on forums moaning nobody was doin last round with 1UP?????
LCH's hitting 2 big allies might cost them dear, or it might not but it will be fun finding out
g/l to both of you
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 18:55
|
#35
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRat
Im shocked, alliances denying relations on AD! Stop the press..
Oh, wait...
|
You've lost me there.
Maybe this is tactics by the 1up AD spamcrew to provoke HR into the frame (with the nap comments), so they can justify their 5 alliance war again LCH?
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 19:17
|
#36
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocknLoad
From what I hear and see its 1up/absolute/Mistu blocking against LCH. So much for 1up never blocking. What a joke. :P
|
I think you need to go re-read our mission statement, as nowhere in it did we ever say we would never block.
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 19:28
|
#37
|
Sh33p h3rd3r
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 132
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochese
I think you need to go re-read our mission statement, as nowhere in it did we ever say we would never block.
|
Ahhh so it is true
__________________
Roiding No More
eXilitionAscendancy
*****************
Do not make me get out the paddle!!! "
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 19:53
|
#38
|
100% irresistible
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Suomi
Posts: 192
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
eat 'em, Sid (without your mingling... lets see... someone like MISTUs performance (for yet another round) will look sad) :gollum:
__________________
- cheerios -
Part of the Elysium legacy.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 20:09
|
#39
|
fanboy
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 492
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocknLoad
Ahhh so it is true
|
Actually, if you do go and read it, it quite clearly says that all alliances should enter the round clean, and when some alliance get ahead, a temporary NAP/Alliance should be founded to peg them decently back to an equal stance. The main issue is to keep the politics fluent, however everyone fears that alliances won't be able to break up after co-operating for a little while.
__________________
Ascendancy, former [ 1UP] & Ministry.
FOUNDER OF THE OFFICIAL ASCENDANCY LADY GAGA FAN CLUB
ASCENDANCY DEMOLITION MAN
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 20:30
|
#40
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 642
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
You've lost me there.
Maybe this is tactics by the 1up AD spamcrew to provoke HR into the frame (with the nap comments), so they can justify their 5 alliance war again LCH?
|
1) My post wasnt spam.
2) Name those 5 alliances please.
3) Did I mention HR? Wierd, I cant remember doing so.
[Edit: God, my spelling is crap]
__________________
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most
-Elysium Officer
[1up] Senior MO
Retired
Last edited by TheRat; 29 Oct 2004 at 20:38.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 20:34
|
#41
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
I am the spamcrew.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 20:40
|
#42
|
Stolen
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 487
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
NOTICE !
Now when the”big” elephants are at war the rest of you can start to play this game properly.
Normally the officer puts all their members in a stage of “grounded fleets” when a war is declared. This means that you the “simple” PA player have a chance to collect some easy roids cos none of the alliances members are allowed to launch a fleet without an officer’s approval…
__________________
Who, me?
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 20:41
|
#43
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 642
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by MotoX
NOTICE !
Now when the”big” elephants are at war the rest of you can start to play this game properly.
Normally the officer puts all their members in a stage of “grounded fleets” when a war is declared. This means that you the “simple” PA player have a chance to collect some easy roids cos none of the alliances members are allowed to launch a fleet without an officer’s approval…
|
What a great intro to basic PA warfare.
__________________
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most
-Elysium Officer
[1up] Senior MO
Retired
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 20:43
|
#44
|
Stolen
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 487
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
/me blushes
__________________
Who, me?
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 22:01
|
#45
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRat
1) My post wasnt spam.
2) Name those 5 alliances please.
3) Did I mention HR? Wierd, I cant remember doing so.
[Edit: God, my spelling is crap]
|
1) Your post followed a fellow 1uper implying a "HR nap with LCH", you didnt have to mention HR; it was common sense to assume your comment was in relation to this? If you didnt mean HR (which you clearly did:P), well you should be careful around here, aren't you aware AD is soaked in petrol?
2) The "5 alliances" i mentioned, well that was a remark i made alongside and in kin with the HR related comments. Comments only made to stir and provoke.
3) I didnt say your post was spam, i tried to imply you were apart of the the 1up spamcrew:P
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 22:18
|
#46
|
Vitriolic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: #public
Posts: 1,506
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
1uper implying a "HR nap with LCH
|
I don't see any implication, more of a statement.
__________________
Chief [ 1up] Chimp.
<@JBG> by the way is mazzelaar a community account that everyone in 1up logs into when they're feeling angry?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBGood
mazzelaar has always reminded me of a hungry hungry hippo. Except instead of eating marbles he just bites the heads off new AD posters
|
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 23:18
|
#47
|
W00f w00f w00f
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 319
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
are you denying your NAP with LCH? Ofcourse last time I checked, it was actually about 3-4 days ago, you may have dropped it now, but we both know, you were* nap`d.
*probably still are.
|
Did you misspell 3 - 4 days with 3 - 4 rounds? Maybe you mixed up your handwritten little squabbelings you call intel and looked at one of the older round's intel. Or maybe your intel just sucks....
I think the last
__________________
Woof Woof!
[HR]
Exode
|
|
|
29 Oct 2004, 23:41
|
#48
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Maybe you`re just an ignorant fool? Or maybe you`re just foolishly trying to hide something most alliances already know & accept anyway?
I think both.
[edit- "handwritten squabblings called intel" you mean the same ones which got your HC`s panicking and cluelessly questioning a close friend of mine who happens to be HR BC or summit (& also a very loyal hr member heh) because of how "sucky" they are?]
Last edited by _ryzekiel_; 29 Oct 2004 at 23:53.
|
|
|
30 Oct 2004, 01:13
|
#49
|
NewDawn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 468
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
weee, let the flamings begin.. oh wait, they have started :/
__________________
Proud to be Newdawn
|
|
|
30 Oct 2004, 03:29
|
#50
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: Rnd 1 FIGHT
Wow, i think its time for HR to leave this thread because its clearly lost any credibility it may have had.
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10.
| |