|
|
7 Dec 2004, 22:04
|
#1
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Hi LCH
Dear LCH members, Dear LCH Officers, Dear LCH High Command.
In order to win, Im afraid you have to start to target 1up. I dont get why this is so hard for you to figure out, but it seems that hitting ND is all you can do. If you want an enemy to loose roids and score, you have to attack them! This might be shocking for you, but the truth sometimes hurts.
Now, ND is 45million score behind you, so why you care so much about them, is beyond me.
So come on now, get yourself and your allies to attack 1up.
Im sure you can make it if you try.
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
7 Dec 2004, 22:10
|
#2
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Hi LCH
Same goes for defending HR against ND incomings.
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
7 Dec 2004, 22:14
|
#3
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov
Dear LCH members, Dear LCH Officers, Dear LCH High Command.
In order to win, Im afraid you have to start to target 1up. I dont get why this is so hard for you to figure out, but it seems that hitting ND is all you can do. If you want an enemy to loose roids and score, you have to attack them! This might be shocking for you, but the truth sometimes hurts.
Now, ND is 45million score behind you, so why you care so much about them, is beyond me.
So come on now, get yourself and your allies to attack 1up.
Im sure you can make it if you try.
|
hi
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
7 Dec 2004, 23:20
|
#4
|
pe0n
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kindom of the Netherlands
Posts: 1,347
|
Re: Hi LCH
Why don't you sit around the table and make a deal about it. I'd hate it if the average 1up member ends this round with more roids than the average Rock member.
__________________
round 5 noob
round 6 noob
round 7 noob: rank 6.198 25:20:25 - VoC member
round 8 noob: rank 4.112 7:2:3 - TFD member
round 9 rank 941 23:1:9 - TFD HC
round 9.5 rank 860 22:7:3 - TFD HC
round 10: rank unknown (was #1 for a while) 5:2:5 - Vengeance pe0n
round 10.5: rank 683 19:10:2 - VGN member
round 11: rank 138 8:8:4 - VsN member
round 12: rank 515 - VGN 'special attack officer' -> jumped ship to Rock
round 13: rank 85: NoS
|
|
|
7 Dec 2004, 23:20
|
#5
|
Raaaaaaaah!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,296
|
Re: Hi LCH
Maybe they just don't like ND ? Can't see why though Barrow, Vader and Fish are all very pretty.
Gerbie please go back away from AD again.
__________________
Hicks
Mercury & Solace
Always [Fury]
|
|
|
7 Dec 2004, 23:43
|
#6
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
Why don't you sit around the table and make a deal about it. I'd hate it if the average 1up member ends this round with more roids than the average Rock member.
|
At this rate the average 1UP member will have more roids than all ROCK members combined:xmas: (look, christmas smilies, oh joy)
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
7 Dec 2004, 23:58
|
#7
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 642
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov
Dear LCH members, Dear LCH Officers, Dear LCH High Command.
In order to win, Im afraid you have to start to target 1up. I dont get why this is so hard for you to figure out, but it seems that hitting ND is all you can do. If you want an enemy to loose roids and score, you have to attack them! This might be shocking for you, but the truth sometimes hurts.
Now, ND is 45million score behind you, so why you care so much about them, is beyond me.
So come on now, get yourself and your allies to attack 1up.
Im sure you can make it if you try.
|
Id like to know exactly how you have the full overview of who's hitting who tbh..
__________________
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most
-Elysium Officer
[1up] Senior MO
Retired
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 00:16
|
#8
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Hi LCH
He probably joined 1up, used our intel (haxing) tools, then quit after being enlightened.
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 00:24
|
#9
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Hi LCH
I did as I always do. I use my enourmous hax0ring skills. Nah, Im really just Sid.
(on the more serious note; its not that hard to figure out, using sandmans site, and talking with friends from both sides)
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 00:35
|
#10
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 702
|
Re: Hi LCH
zhukov, you play this game?
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 00:38
|
#11
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: Hi LCH
He isn't far off the mark really. I am really glad 1up will win this round, would hate it if they didn't. If they didn't, it means LCH would win, and them scumbags don't deserve the win. They have stagnated the round beyond belief.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 01:23
|
#12
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by alch
zhukov, you play this game?
|
ph33r my freebie account!
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 03:19
|
#13
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: Hi LCH
Their top members won't hit 1up so they've got to find an alliance to suit their needs, I'd guess.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 08:35
|
#14
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
He isn't far off the mark really. I am really glad 1up will win this round, would hate it if they didn't. If they didn't, it means LCH would win, and them scumbags don't deserve the win. They have stagnated the round beyond belief.
|
ND in "we want 1up to win" shocker .... surprising?
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 08:57
|
#15
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
ND in "we want 1up to win" shocker .... surprising?
|
Nope.
I for one would hate LCH to win this rd
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 09:37
|
#16
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: Hi LCH
It's a case of the 'lesser of 2 evils'.
There is NO way I would want to give LCH any chance of a victory at all. They really have dug their own grave with this one.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 11:06
|
#17
|
W00f w00f w00f
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 319
|
Re: Hi LCH
Got milk?
I'd rather see LCH win in front of 1up, but only cause i dislike 1up for roiding me :P
btw Cockcheese, afaik we dont attack nd and nd dont attack us atm, and on top of that lch has no reason to defend hr...
__________________
Woof Woof!
[HR]
Exode
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 13:42
|
#18
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
If they didn't, it means LCH would win, and them scumbags don't deserve the win. They have stagnated the round beyond belief.
|
what the hell did you just say? please supply some arguments for all the crap you're saying, back it up..this is just mindless flaming
what makes us stagnate the round...scumbags? cause we roided you 3 rounds ago?
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 14:49
|
#19
|
Lost the Fury... :(
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 516
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exode
Got milk?
I'd rather see LCH win in front of 1up, but only cause i dislike 1up for roiding me :P
btw Cockcheese, afaik we dont attack nd and nd dont attack us atm, and on top of that lch has no reason to defend hr...
|
OMG!!!! ND/HR BLOCKING SCANDAL!!!!
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 14:51
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
Their top members won't hit 1up so they've got to find an alliance to suit their needs, I'd guess.
|
__________________
Proud to have been [1up]
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 15:03
|
#21
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
what the hell did you just say? please supply some arguments for all the crap you're saying, back it up..this is just mindless flaming
what makes us stagnate the round...scumbags? cause we roided you 3 rounds ago?
|
Clearly referring to the fact that when 1up were closing in on you, you decided to throw the kitchen sink (with your friends) at NewDawn. Thus removing our chances, and as another result of it, removing your own.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 16:11
|
#22
|
Raaaaaaaah!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,296
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exode
btw Cockcheese, afaik we dont attack nd and nd dont attack us atm, and on top of that lch has no reason to defend hr...
|
Comedy genius
__________________
Hicks
Mercury & Solace
Always [Fury]
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 16:46
|
#23
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exode
Got milk?
btw Cockcheese, afaik we dont attack nd and nd dont attack us atm, and on top of that lch has no reason to defend hr...
|
Then why did the HR planet I attacked night before last ONLY have LCH defense fleets inbound?
(Yes, my intel is correct, it has proved to be accurate all round)
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 18:13
|
#24
|
I see you!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In any girl
Posts: 2,825
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochese
Then why did the HR planet I attacked night before last ONLY have LCH defense fleets inbound?
|
Maybe the planet was HR and then joined LCH, thus you having wrong intel? (just my theory as you say it was only LCH defence there) (ofc, if the FI def was eta 8 Im gonna shut up)
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 21:31
|
#25
|
snadwich fetcher
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: ONE LOVE
Posts: 660
|
Re: Hi LCH
If the largest members in my alliance would not hit targets that were tactically beneficial, they would no longer be in my alliance.
The same goes for cheating, coincidentally.
Pick your poison elviz.
__________________
Nude On!
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 22:58
|
#26
|
I Dislike carDi
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 45
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov
Dear LCH members, Dear LCH Officers, Dear LCH High Command.
In order to win, Im afraid you have to start to target 1up. I dont get why this is so hard for you to figure out, but it seems that hitting ND is all you can do. If you want an enemy to loose roids and score, you have to attack them! This might be shocking for you, but the truth sometimes hurts.
Now, ND is 45million score behind you, so why you care so much about them, is beyond me.
So come on now, get yourself and your allies to attack 1up.
Im sure you can make it if you try.
|
Lame?
LCH cant win the round, I told them once before and ill say it again, attacking me when i left LCH as neutral was the mistake of the round. ( Im 1up )
LCH also cant win the round because the HC allows the top members to fence sit! Yes thats you elviz and cocteau :eek:
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 23:44
|
#27
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeK
Lame?
LCH cant win the round, I told them once before and ill say it again, attacking me when i left LCH as neutral was the mistake of the round. ( Im 1up )
LCH also cant win the round because the HC allows the top members to fence sit! Yes thats you elviz and cocteau :eek:
|
It's wonderful having LCH's two biggest members pop up through [NADS] every night \o/
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 23:50
|
#28
|
Sh33p h3rd3r
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 132
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeK
Lame?
LCH cant win the round, I told them once before and ill say it again, attacking me when i left LCH as neutral was the mistake of the round. ( Im 1up )
LCH also cant win the round because the HC allows the top members to fence sit! Yes thats you elviz and cocteau :eek:
|
You leave an alliance and dont expect them to hit you? What planet you live on?
__________________
Roiding No More
eXilitionAscendancy
*****************
Do not make me get out the paddle!!! "
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 00:01
|
#29
|
I Dislike carDi
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 45
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocknLoad
You leave an alliance and dont expect them to hit you? What planet you live on?
|
considering the reasons on why i left, yes. even so, i told them lch wont win this round if they attack me.
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 00:05
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,081
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeK
considering the reasons on why i left, yes. even so, i told them lch wont win this round if they attack me.
|
Clearly you are the true kingmaker of this round
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 00:34
|
#31
|
snadwich fetcher
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: ONE LOVE
Posts: 660
|
Re: Hi LCH
TeK - that is rather shamelessly egotistical.
__________________
Nude On!
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 00:41
|
#32
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeK
considering the reasons on why i left, yes. even so, i told them lch wont win this round if they attack me.
|
The round really isn't over. But maybe, just maybe, (a very tinnie wennie maybe), the universe doesn't revolve around you. Sorry.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 00:51
|
#33
|
I Dislike carDi
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 45
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrow|Pony
TeK - that is rather shamelessly egotistical.
|
Thats me \o/
---
Chika -- Lies!
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 00:56
|
#34
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeK
Thats me \o/
---
Chika -- Lies!
|
NO MORE ATTACKING ME YOU TWAT :eek:
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 11:26
|
#35
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
It's wonderful having LCH's two biggest members pop up through [NADS] every night \o/
|
so im not the only 1 who talks to you guys thru [NADS]?? :xmas:
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 14:19
|
#36
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
what the hell did you just say? please supply some arguments
for
all the crap you're saying, back it up..this is just mindless flaming
what makes us stagnate the round...scumbags? cause we roided you 3 rounds
ago?
|
Well, all hail the mighty LCH I mean how can we not love LCH when
they:
- Supporting Fencesitters who refuse to target 1up as that would put their
planet at risk, god forbid were they to lose score/roids! This is so
obvious, that even LCH players themselfs tell me (oh yes, they are annoyed
by it).
- Failing to target 1up on several occaisons to bring any sense of
competition in the round, infact most of the time avoiding any kind of difficult
conflict.
It kind of shows how much more deserving 1up (this might be somewhat
shocking from me, heh) are when they are willing to fight anyone at any
time, even if they are Sid and his peons. Even ND who you view as your
inferiors will target anyone at any time this round - they're simply forced
to be on 1ups side due to the people targetting them being remarkbly similar
to those who target 1up, so what can you expect, really - they aren't going
to do anything because you say they should. ND plays, not to support 1up, but to
win themselfs.
All in all LCH have been shown to have an alliance with bags of ability (you
don't get to that score without it), yet as soon as any kind of challenge
comes up, instead of standing up to it run like girls and indeed point the
finger at 1up so someone else can get you out of trouble. Are you scared of Sid? Did he
roid you too many times a few rounds ago?
So yeah, Nitros - when are you (are you at all, infact) going to start taking action about fencesitting and take full military control of your alliance?
Or are LCH HC simply acting for certain large planets personal benefit (that
would not be the first time in planetarions history..), while the welfare of
other less well known players/smaller planets seems indeed quite secondary
to your bunch, even though some of them seem up for fighting for LCH and
targetting 1up actively?
1up doesn't allow fencesitting this round.
ND doesn't either, as far as I know (and I was member there untill quite
recently). So, no members have agreements with other alliances, while there's probably
a long list of LCH (and possibly others) Sid could tell us if he wanted to.
Fear 1up and ND for their lack of integrity, eh? I'm sure there's more that
could be dug up against LCH, so we'll just stick to these for now.
I look forward to a reply, that goes beyond "hi"
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 14:41
|
#37
|
Spastic Drivel!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BloodFlower Village
Posts: 313
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeK
even so, i told them lch wont win this round if they attack me.
|
Finally, the reason why lch didnt win the round - revealed... \o/
Was trying to figure that out, for quite sometime now.
__________________
Amnesty International || Band Aid
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 15:17
|
#38
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: Hi LCH
Did they kick you zhukov?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhukov
Even ND who you view as your inferiors will target anyone at any time this round - they're simply forced to be on 1ups side due to the people targetting them being remarkbly similar to those who target 1up, so what can you expect, really
|
It was NDs decision to help 1up, no1 forced them into it.
Quote:
ND plays, not to support 1up, but to win themselfs.
|
I bet it was these kind of comments that got you kicked?;P You say they were "forced to be on 1ups side" but then you say they play NOT to support 1up?
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 15:25
|
#39
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov
<lots of txt>
I look forward to a reply, that goes beyond "hi"
|
experience over the last 16 rounds tells me its useless to explain anything on AD as the only result coming out of it is flaming, whining and alot of bullshit
you might have noticed that LCH hasnt made any comments on AD last rounds, we'll leave the flaming, the drawing of not-backed-up-conclusions and the whining to others...they are doing a perfect job so far, why would we want to interfere them
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 17:05
|
#40
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
Did they kick you zhukov?
|
I never been kicked from any alliance Ive played in, expect for Elysium in round 4 (becouse I spied on them, naughty me). Your intel is lacking as usual.
Quote:
It was NDs decision to help 1up, no1 forced them into it.
|
With LCH having allied HR,VsN and the remains of MISTU, who else was there to cooperate with?? How smart are you?
Quote:
I bet it was these kind of comments that got you kicked?;P You say they were "forced to be on 1ups side" but then you say they play NOT to support 1up?
|
Im not sure whats worst, your mental capabilities or your lack of reading skills. Seriously SethMace, get a grip.
1up plays to win. ND plays to win. LCH plays to .. be chicken sh*its* I guess. HR plays to do well or *something*. As I wrote above, there wasnt many to cooperate for ND, expect for 1up. Now you dont have to be a genious to understand (but since your dumb, I will spell it out for you) that ND could have been #1 now, if LCH/HR/Vsn+"friends" had choose to focus on 1up instead of ND. Its hardly NDs fault that the LCH-block are afraid of hitting 1up is?
Whenever I respond to you SethMace, I feel like Im like the BBC. A public service.
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 17:13
|
#41
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
experience over the last 16 rounds tells me its useless to explain anything on AD as the only result coming out of it is flaming, whining and alot of bullshit
you might have noticed that LCH hasnt made any comments on AD last rounds, we'll leave the flaming, the drawing of not-backed-up-conclusions and the whining to others...they are doing a perfect job so far, why would we want to interfere them
|
I asked you some questions. They should be quite easy to reply to. As you are HC, you should also have enough information to back up your case.
Im left to assume that LCH HC has a) no control over firepower b) are to chicken sh*t to hit 1up c) allow fencesitting.
I was was a medium sized planet in your alliance, who actually didnt just went looking for easy roids, I wouldnt feel "ok" with your lack of answer. But then again, maybe they already know there is a difference in membership status in LCH, between those who fight for the alliance, and those who wants to have big planets at all cost.
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 17:22
|
#42
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: Hi LCH
There was a difference of opinion between me and Zhukov. A 12 hour meeting ensued, I won the power struggle, Zhukov walked.
True Story.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 17:31
|
#43
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Hi LCH
LCH HC probably don`t post because they are possibly too embarrassed at their handling of their peon-block`s firepower throughout the round in many cases (such as how 11.5k BS`s from all top100 planets were sent at a planet who had already lost 2k+ rocks beforehand and only had 1k left (this was around tick 750 though) and not to mention, sending 80+ fleets at TeK within the course of a day and still managing to cap nothing) & they don`t actually have a sensible explanation for why they have done somethings they did & also gone the political route in the way they have with regards to their (and peons) expectations of ND to help them heh.
Just a stab in the dark though !
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 19:03
|
#44
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov
With LCH having allied HR,VsN and the remains of MISTU, who else was there to cooperate with?? How smart are you?
|
Couldn't you have told me before? If I knew LCH were allied to HR, I would have asked the roids back they stole from me in several raids during the round...
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 21:27
|
#45
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
experience over the last 16 rounds tells me its useless to explain anything on AD as the only result coming out of it is flaming, whining and alot of bullshit
you might have noticed that LCH hasnt made any comments on AD last rounds, we'll leave the flaming, the drawing of not-backed-up-conclusions and the whining to others...they are doing a perfect job so far, why would we want to interfere them
|
In your view, would Sid be lying if he got out a list of LCH members that are napped to 1up?
I don't see how anything is BS if it's known throughout the universe to be fact. As LCH HC you are in the (un)fortunate position of being able to set the record straight to some basic (if somewhat direct) questions. Considering they question the very ethos of your alliance and how it treats some players better than others, I think you'ld be better off responding, as the longer you don't the more the negative image appears to people as the reality. But if you wish to stick to your current policy, your decision, I'd guess.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 22:42
|
#46
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov
I never been kicked from any alliance Ive played in, expect for Elysium in round 4 (becouse I spied on them, naughty me). Your intel is lacking as usual.
|
You are the bestest at contradictions zhukov! And my intell? Lol, wtf does intell have to do with me ASKING you if you were kicked, it was a simple question.
Quote:
With LCH having allied HR,VsN and the remains of MISTU, who else was there to cooperate with?? How smart are you?
|
HR started hitting 1up AFTER ND & 1up had started on LCH.
Quote:
Im not sure whats worst, your mental capabilities or your lack of reading skills. Seriously SethMace, get a grip.
|
Played you for your flaming & baiting reply that totally side stepped my arguement, you aint very good at posting on ADs are you
Quote:
1up plays to win. ND plays to win. LCH plays to .. be chicken sh*its* I guess. HR plays to do well or *something*. As I wrote above, there wasnt many to cooperate for ND, expect for 1up. Now you dont have to be a genious to understand (but since your dumb, I will spell it out for you) that ND could have been #1 now, if LCH/HR/Vsn+"friends" had choose to focus on 1up instead of ND. Its hardly NDs fault that the LCH-block are afraid of hitting 1up is?
|
Ill explain this for you just once m8 but ND allying with 1up to take on LCH (who had a substantial lead at that point), was the reason said alliance would NEED to find allies. Then look at the likes of Sin, ToF who also started helping 1ups targetting and you have a totally unbalanced war.
There is NOWAY in the world ND would have finished the round #1 because they (like every other ally in the game), woudlnt be able to hack the incomings of a block war that they helped create.
Quote:
Whenever I respond to you SethMace, I feel like Im like the BBC. A public service.
|
I dont think you can call your reading problems a public problem zhuky?
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 23:07
|
#47
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
HR started hitting 1up AFTER ND & 1up had started on LCH.
|
But you NAP`d LCH before?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
Played you for your flaming & baiting reply that totally side stepped my arguement, you aint very good at posting on ADs are you
|
Yet he made a good point huh ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
Ill explain this for you just once m8 but ND allying with 1up to take on LCH (who had a substantial lead at that point), was the reason said alliance would NEED to find allies. Then look at the likes of Sin, ToF who also started helping 1ups targetting and you have a totally unbalanced war.
|
because LCH didn`t have peon flak regardless huh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
I dont think you can call your reading problems a public problem zhuky?
|
no no.. YOUR comprehension disability is the problem, public only because you publicize it so much with so many posts displaying it
|
|
|
10 Dec 2004, 00:37
|
#48
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
But you NAP`d LCH before?
|
If you still honestly believe this, you have issues of denial - Accept defeat jerome:P
Quote:
no no.. YOUR comprehension disability is the problem, public only because you publicize it so much with so many posts displaying it
|
^^ Damn you and Zhukov are so similar in your contradictions, just like him, you make one remark (which has been officially stated as false by ME on numerous occassions) and then you go attack some1 elses comprehension skills.
You two are perfect for each other, whens the wedding? Fishy will be along soon in offering his bridesmaid services;P
Anyways, I'm not going to compete with you two over issues of comprehension, gramma, spelling, intelligence ect.. ect.., for the blatent fact that i dont respect either of you two enough to participate in such a "competition" and i've no need to prove myself to either of you in ANY way what-so-ever. Dont you two know personal insults are outlets for posters who are unable to see the heart of the matter?
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
10 Dec 2004, 01:06
|
#49
|
Eclipse High Command
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eclipse
Posts: 1,144
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
If you still honestly believe this, you have issues of denial - Accept defeat jerome:P
^^ Damn you and Zhukov are so similar in your contradictions, just like him, you make one remark (which has been officially stated as false by ME on numerous occassions) and then you go attack some1 elses comprehension skills.
You two are perfect for each other, whens the wedding? Fishy will be along soon in offering his bridesmaid services;P
Anyways, I'm not going to compete with you two over issues of comprehension, gramma, spelling, intelligence ect.. ect.., for the blatent fact that i dont respect either of you two enough to participate in such a "competition" and i've no need to prove myself to either of you in ANY way what-so-ever. Dont you two know personal insults are outlets for posters who are unable to see the heart of the matter?
|
Dude welcome to the internet. noone wants or dreams of your respect. You and them have contradicting views. You insult them, they insult you. In the end youre no better or no worse.
__________________
We fight together,
We win together,
or we die together.
-T&P slogan
Focht
T&P HC
Fury Exec
Eclipse CEO
Stan's muppet
|
|
|
10 Dec 2004, 01:51
|
#50
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Hi LCH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Mace
You are the bestest at contradictions zhukov! And my intell? Lol, wtf does intell have to do with me ASKING you if you were kicked, it was a simple question.
|
So you had no plan to try to stirr up anything?
The "correct" way to stirr up on AD is to first ask a question, then if the person denies, post the evidence (aka intel). In your case, you have a problem. You dont have any intel.
Besides, its not "bestest" and its not "intell".
Quote:
HR started hitting 1up AFTER ND & 1up had started on LCH.
|
It wasnt like you could hit LCH was it? As you had been napped with LCH from the start.
The cards were already given out, what was left, was to play with them.
Quote:
Played you for your flaming & baiting reply that totally side stepped my arguement, you aint very good at posting on ADs are you
|
Good attempt at "I write some crap, so I can dogde the questions".
Quote:
Ill explain this for you just once m8 but ND allying with 1up to take on LCH (who had a substantial lead at that point), was the reason said alliance would NEED to find allies. Then look at the likes of Sin, ToF who also started helping 1ups targetting and you have a totally unbalanced war.
|
There is bigger fish in the sea than SiN and ToF (no offence to those).
ND makes it decisions based on what suits ND, not a hate towords 1up, like other alliances seems to do.
Quote:
There is NOWAY in the world ND would have finished the round #1 because they (like every other ally in the game), woudlnt be able to hack the incomings of a block war that they helped create.
|
That is your assesment. ND thinks otherwise. I think otherwise.
Quote:
I dont think you can call your reading problems a public problem zhuky?
|
I agree. My reading problems are non-existant, and therefore your correct to call the "not a public problem". Your reading and writing skills, on the other hand...
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:40.
| |