Amateur Philosophy, please criticise
i think the human-being is born "evil". however i am not sure if my argumentation is adequat.
bsically, this is my fundament of argumentation:
look, i thought when you parent a child, on the one hand you care that much so he/her won't die the physically way. on the other hand you try to show no feelings/love (or in other words, you try to ignore) towards your children. this would theoretical mean that the mental stage of the child will change as little as possible.
- to me this sounds logical or atleast imaginable
this is the rest of my argumention/or how i imagine it could be:
during the time of growth the childwill try to get some attention. but sooner or later he/her realises that he still will be ignored, which makes the children sad.now the children dont want to stay in the stage of sadness/dissappointment, so i think sooner or later (depends on the psychially skin) the child will turn angry and seek for revenge/and also to get attention).
- well i guess it is a bit wishy-washy expressed, but still imaginable.
i know that my thought ain't new (i guess jean-jacques it was), but you know every generation has to found the wheel anew.
basic question: does it sound reasonable/imaginable/logic to you? (if not, why?)
does my theory have major flaws?
ps: you could also do me a favor, if you want to argue with me (what i want), try to imagine like you would argue with a little children, let say 10 years old (from a language point of view)
__________________
The music called Jaazzz..
Charlie Mingus, such nimble fingers
Droppin the bass, all over the place
|