|
|
15 May 2008, 00:57
|
#51
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
tissues anyone?
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Iuvat
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 01:02
|
#52
|
Fook Yu
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Looked pal
Posts: 383
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Theamion
tissues anyone?
|
I hear those Kleenex boxes come in value packs now. Go stack up, and get some for R27 while you're at it.
__________________
HEROES - It's not cheating if you admit to it
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 01:09
|
#53
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
I'd call 3.7mil attacker to 10.6mil defenders losses "won" if thats infact what u were trying to dispute. Reason we didnt gain was because 2 of our "worthless piece of shit" members decided to defend stoom against their own ally on said fleet catch and left before land.
For future reference to other ally HC's, don't let the likes of D3coy or Typhoon anywhere near ur ally. Nearly as big a mistake as letting Kenny have his forum account back before the round ended.
Anyway congrats Ascendancy.
|
The only reason you and kenny make those pathetic whine-threads is in you administration. You recruit members with the inside politics not giving a shit who they are and how they play. And after you face the consequences that you was warned before, you bark out low and post here.
Open your eyes and ears sometimes, and do conclusions before the critical moments.
funny thread btw, keep it up!
Ah, and btw, how low must you fall on this board for personal insults?
Last edited by D3coy; 15 May 2008 at 01:29.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 03:37
|
#54
|
Muppet
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Under Your Bed
Posts: 301
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
try getting Stoom to launch 1st wave on Denial planets rather than letting ND take the brunt of the early defence ships so you can have an easier time of it.
|
hmm.. how about i launch the ONLY wave on VenoX denial HC and roid him (with a fake btw) and also last night (and many other nights) i organise waves like on FAst_ ..denial t10 planet and roid them for free (and my sk's have a superb win record).. simply put, lies make the baby jesus cry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
I'd call 3.7mil attacker to 10.6mil defenders losses "won" if thats infact what u were trying to dispute. Reason we didnt gain was because 2 of our "worthless piece of shit" members decided to defend stoom against their own ally on said fleet catch and left before land.
Anyway congrats Ascendancy.
|
Funny bit is you claiming Denial not gaining when it was in fact NoX who did the fleetcatch, so why should you have gained? perhaps your members got disillusioned by your lack of military abilities, defending us after we roided them says a lot for a loss of loyalty in your alliance..
Thanks for the last part though, even if slightly premature...
__________________
ex... [Ministry][LCH][Ascendancy]
Retired.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 04:44
|
#55
|
Tilting at windmills
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 579
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
They would have gained by the gap narrowing, regardless of which group of lemmings they decided to send against Ascendancy.
Tbh Denial could have chosen any one of our big planets to fleetcatch, and they ****ed it up by choosing a planet in gal with members who had told them that they were willing to put their galmates ahead of their alliance.
This was foolish. You should have known how tight 8:8 was as a galaxy and factored that in when you sent your catch. You knew your members in that gal weren't going to be happy about it, they'd told you previously.
My feeling from the last few days is that Denial have been putting up a good fight. I thought by this stage we'd be kicking the daylights out of a walking corpse. But I'll only give credit where credit is due; it's your members, and not your HC's, that are doing your alliance proud at the moment.
__________________
[Fury] [1up] [Ascendancy]
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 05:50
|
#56
|
Up The Hatters!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooling
This was foolish. You should have known how tight 8:8 was as a galaxy and factored that in when you sent your catch. You knew your members in that gal weren't going to be happy about it, they'd told you previously.
|
Classic example of a failing hc's attempt to pin the blame on losing on someone else. Quite amusing actually.
__________________
Planetarion veteran
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 10:34
|
#57
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 227
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
At the end of the day, its been ND/CT/Jenova(sometimes HA too) and Asc vs NoX/Denial, thats fact, and stoom trying to tell people otherwise is just lies, and liars get found out.
As for the ship jumpers, d3coy and Typhoon, if you grow tired of alliances/hc/members, there are certain ways of going about things, like talking, taking action etc, not jumping ship, and defending against denial in the process, thats just low, i'm not gonna personally insult people, its just a game, but there were better ways of doing things.
As for everyone hating Denials "were gonna win" messages which were posted mainly by Kenny, thats fair enough, but Kenny is one person out of 75, kinda wrong to paint everyone with the same brush, because if thats the case CT are full of wankers, because Forest was there. When infact we know this not to be true, and they have some nice guys there.
p.s Thanks for the neg rep Stoom With you wanting me to "die" i'm not sure how i can carry on, kept me up all night thinking about it, neg reps make me very depressed, those very depressing little red lights
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 10:47
|
#58
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
This, again, is just untrue. To be honest I don't even know who HCs hidden agenda, no offence intended heh, and I certainly haven't spoke to anyone involved over there this round. I presume you're not intentionally lying about this given your rather fervently expressed beliefs above but you're certainly hilariously deluded.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 10:50
|
#59
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 531
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
At the end of the day, its been ND/CT/Jenova(sometimes HA too) and Asc vs NoX/Denial, thats fact, and stoom trying to tell people otherwise is just lies, and liars get found out.
|
It's not a fact as you literally have no clue, but you are right, liars do get found out...
4 nights, yes FOUR nights, Asc/ToF/CT/ND have targeted Denial and NoX together. Ask any other alliance HC and they will tell you the same. Denial and NoX actually only received 2 nights each of P targeted incoming, as we did 2 nights on Denial (to help Asc) and 2 nights on NoX (to help CT/ND and in part Asc). Hardly the Universal bashing that you seem to want to imply lost you the round.
If you want to look at reason's you lost the round, you should maybe ask NoX why they decided to hit CT/ND planets and give us the chance to target a 'joint' enemy. Or maybe you could ask the people 'organising'(and I use the term VERY loosely) your attacks, why on Earth they felt launching 100 fleets on 3 planets would ever win them the round? You lost the round because your members lost value by continually crashing. You had a 20million round lead, by just simply giving up your roids you would have still had the lead, and some pretty crappy planets to attack.
Your HC also still think in straight lines. You have branded CT/ND/Asc as allies, but I'm sure if you ask any of us we will tell you we are anything but. What we are is a group of alliances with common enemies because of yours and NoX's suicidal and damn right laughable attempt at political play. Maybe instead of attacking CT/ND you would have been better served trying to offer them something they wanted? Like first picks on high roid, high value Asc planets? Or maybe the notion that you won't attack their top planets anymore?
However when the targets picked is influenced by 2 planets need to try to win the round, you can't then moan that your alliance is in a bad political situation.
Quote:
As for the ship jumpers, d3coy and Typhoon, if you grow tired of alliances/hc/members, there are certain ways of going about things, like talking, taking action etc, not jumping ship, and defending against denial in the process, that’s just low, I’m not going to personally insult people, its just a game, but there were better ways of doing things.
|
Or what you could have done, was not recruited them in the first place when they clearly told you they would defend their BP. It's your HC's fault for being weak in recruitment, not d3coy's and Typhoon's fault for doing EXACTLY what they said they would on joining.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 11:17
|
#60
|
Up The Hatters!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
As for everyone hating Denials "were gonna win" messages which were posted mainly by Kenny, thats fair enough, but Kenny is one person out of 75, kinda wrong to paint everyone with the same brush, because if thats the case CT are full of wankers, because Forest was there. When infact we know this not to be true, and they have some nice guys there.
|
I have to disagree. CT IS full of wankers!
__________________
Planetarion veteran
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 11:43
|
#61
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 227
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
The attackin 3 planets was damn right dumb i admit, nothing gained from that apart from 15 roids per player on denials side!
That was one/two nights though, and since then Denial has given as good as its got, uve gotta agree with that.
I put HA in brackets because it wasn't sustained attacking, probably just them jumping on the band waggon, knowing Denial would be squeeze and hoping for some easy roids.
Denial could have changed their destiny true, but i believe they will be better prepared for the coming rounds, if they decide to play, in dealing with these eventualities, but i think its harsh for people to flame denial members for simply doing what is told of them, you know as well as i that you do what people expect of you. not sure on the d3coy/typhoon situation, but if what you say is true, then more fool denial
I actually like debating with Game, he gives his honest opinion, doesn't flame or personally insult, and he sees both sides of the arguement, if only more people on AD were like this there might actually be some activity
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 13:42
|
#62
|
Finn.. who's drunk.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 285
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
den/nox in some capacity actually hitted me/isildur/golan 3 nights straight... All 3 of us where just splitting def amongst ourselfs 3 mornings... to cover what we can what was like 70-80% of inc's as the waves where full of holes where def could come and beat them back.
About those 2 leaving tag.... cba to comment it more than everyone though it's cool that few persons can decide how round ends when I bitched about it earlier this round how ridiculous it could be. Anyways spartan's nostalgia for 8:8, would have done the same especially for BP mates.
Anyways it's up to others now fight the rest of round... Personally keeping fleets home now and only on def purpose. Dunno anything about politics or stuff... but had fun in ascension as we roided big planets in top30 regularly.
__________________
r2 Thieves
r3: top100(p0rks0da rox) r4: top400(excadrix, pcmaster+me=gal 99th) r5: top150(before giving up, nocex didn't rock) r6:evu and drunk dwarf (top50)
r7: wasted c27 gal, sucky luck in clus. r8: In real Finnish infantry.. 270days r9: boring round as hell
r9.5: Top60(small playerbase=easy)
Few won R's in PIA, r26 top15 First/Last Pax round.
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
10 lines max for signature I heard.. so
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 13:54
|
#63
|
Tilting at windmills
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 579
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
The attack on our three heavy planets was just silly honestly. From our perspective, we sat back and roided denial silly while you wasted fleet after fleet on our best players.
It was incredibly stupid.
As I said earlier, you have only your HC to blame.
__________________
[Fury] [1up] [Ascendancy]
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 16:54
|
#64
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooling
As I said earlier, you have only your HC to blame.
|
Nothing to do with the ~20mil in unncessary fleet crashes. You are right tho. 100% HC fault for not logging into their accounts and recalling fleets AND/OR calc'ing every single attack they ever launched. I wont make the same awful mistakes next round.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 16:56
|
#65
|
Laziness pays off NOW!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL, USA
Posts: 596
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
For future reference to other ally HC's, don't let the likes of D3coy or Typhoon anywhere near ur ally.
|
From my expierence in eXilition, both these members work pretty well with competient HCs, which you are not.
__________________
Proud to have been :
[ReBorn] High Council - Wing Leader
[Knights] High Council - Founder
[Silver] High Council - Military
[WolfPack] High Council - Military
[Ascendancy] Member
[eXilition] High Council - Defence
7-Round Official Planetarion #Support Team Member
Retired Since Round 21
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 16:58
|
#66
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Game^
Or what you could have done, was not recruited them in the first place when they clearly told you they would defend their BP. It's your HC's fault for being weak in recruitment, not d3coy's and Typhoon's fault for doing EXACTLY what they said they would on joining.
|
There was never anything remotely like this said until around 100-200 ticks ago, dunno where u get ur information from. And then this was a mail to the alliance from D3coy saying he'd defend against anyone who WASNT denial (when asked to recall def against NoX). Sorry for also not being able to read peoples minds pre-round, again another NEWBY mistake im sure not to make next round.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 17:12
|
#67
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 227
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAlan
hmm.. how about i launch the ONLY wave on VenoX denial HC and roid him (with a fake btw) and also last night (and many other nights) i organise waves like on FAst_ ..denial t10 planet and roid them for free (and my sk's have a superb win record)....
|
CONGRATULATIONS Asc on recruiting ElAlan, from what he has just said, he has won you the WHOLE round! I did this, I did that, I was brainy enough to land fakes
STFU!
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 17:16
|
#68
|
Custom User Title
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 581
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
STFU!
|
Take your own advice, newbie.
__________________
I LOVE LAMP
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 17:22
|
#69
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 227
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Thanks for your input Tesla! Its welcomed
also what constitutes a nubie, i thought it was a play on the word NEWbie, if thats the case, im not new to this game!
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 17:32
|
#70
|
Custom User Title
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 581
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
Thanks for your input Tesla! Its welcomed
also what constitutes a nubie, i thought it was a play on the word NEWbie, if thats the case, im not new to this game!
|
Change ur sig then cuz it reads: "Round 1-21 = I was a Nub | Round 26 = I'm still a Nub".
Nub and newbie is the same thing last time I checked.
__________________
I LOVE LAMP
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 17:37
|
#71
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 227
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Its like that because #1- i can't remember all the co-ords from those rounds, or where i finished #2- even if i did then i wouldn't waste my time writing them out
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 17:42
|
#72
|
Custom User Title
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 581
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
Its like that because #1- i can't remember all the co-ords from those rounds, or where i finished #2- even if i did then i wouldn't waste my time writing them out
|
Dont argue with me for "reading the label" then. If the label spells out "milk" for me, im bound to call it just that.
PS. You know, you dont have to have a sig. If you don't remember your coords, and you dont want to waste ur time writing then why do you write anything at all? :|
__________________
I LOVE LAMP
Last edited by Tesla; 15 May 2008 at 17:48.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 18:34
|
#73
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooling
From our perspective, we sat back and roided denial silly while you wasted fleet after fleet on our best players.
|
QFT :d
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 18:39
|
#74
|
that one dude
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 200
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
you know what? this is my first time back since r19 and i was expecting it to be awesome like the old rounds were. but it wasnt.
not gonna lie - denial sitting on top whole round made it quite boring im glad they wont win because they dont deserve it imho. this was a very boring round just sitting back and watching denial/nox and everyone else wave their wangs in each others faces trying to see whos is bigger. and what a surprise to see that its asc who brought them down (insert sarcasm here).
im so not excited for r27
__________________
Gypsie - HC [GPY]
Coven - HC [CoV]
NoS - [NoS]
ROCK - DC [ROCK]
The Galactic Vikings - DC [TGV]
Vengeance - DC [VGN]
CareBears - DC [CB]
Rounds 9.5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,19,26,27,28,38
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 19:02
|
#75
|
Motherfracker
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,985
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
wow disc and tesla are bringing up the standard of debating worldwide
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 19:08
|
#76
|
Muppet
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Under Your Bed
Posts: 301
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
CONGRATULATIONS Asc on recruiting ElAlan, from what he has just said, he has won you the WHOLE round! I did this, I did that, I was brainy enough to land fakes
STFU!
|
Well i dont like to gloat ya know, but thanks your ever so kind!
__________________
ex... [Ministry][LCH][Ascendancy]
Retired.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 19:09
|
#77
|
optimist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 263
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
At the end of the day, its been ND/CT/Jenova(sometimes HA too) and Asc vs NoX/Denial, thats fact
|
let me guess, HA failed a cov op on some Denial / Nox planet so you naturally assumed they are just out to get denial 1st priority
yeah i'd say thats a solid assumption on your part. way to go m8y
__________________
*scendancy
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Your attempts to be e-cool have been noted and laughed off as terrible.
|
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 19:40
|
#78
|
Custom User Title
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 581
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaneED
wow disc and tesla are bringing up the standard of debating worldwide
|
Tesla AND disc eh...a mean comparison if I ever saw one :crymeariver:
__________________
I LOVE LAMP
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 19:51
|
#79
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
someone put a leash on tesla
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Iuvat
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 20:17
|
#80
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In bed with your mum.
Posts: 664
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kargool
Classic example of a failing hc's attempt to pin the blame on losing on someone else. Quite amusing actually.
|
Ladies and gentlemen, Kargool, TGV HC.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 20:26
|
#81
|
Poblacht na hÉireann
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,167
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Kargool is Ascendancy HC now muffinbrain. Get with the program and stop living in R25 dude.*
*That said it has been reported on the internet that Junglemuff lost his virginity in said round so I suppose some nostalgia is to be expected.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 20:41
|
#82
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In bed with your mum.
Posts: 664
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles
Kargool is Ascendancy HC now muffinbrain. Get with the program and stop living in R25 dude.*
*That said it has been reported on the internet that Junglemuff lost his virginity in said round so I suppose some nostalgia is to be expected.
|
No, rd 25 was the round i first shagged Golans ex missus D:
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 21:14
|
#83
|
Poblacht na hÉireann
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,167
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
You will note that your reply does not in any way counter my statement. I gladly accept this as confirmation, thank you.
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 21:25
|
#84
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In bed with your mum.
Posts: 664
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
I wish i could counter said statement, unfortunately, i cant :/
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 21:28
|
#85
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
CONGRATULATIONS Asc on recruiting ElAlan, from what he has just said, he has won you the WHOLE round! I did this, I did that, I was brainy enough to land fakes
STFU!
|
Well arguably i've won Ascendancy the round but okay ElAlan can take the glory because I think he's pretty ****ing great and if it annoys everyone else i'm all for that sort of thing.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 22:21
|
#86
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 227
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by stay_posi
let me guess, HA failed a cov op on some Denial / Nox planet so you naturally assumed they are just out to get denial 1st priority
yeah i'd say thats a solid assumption on your part. way to go m8y
|
Its u thats made the assumption m8ty I've got the incs reported
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 23:10
|
#87
|
Over the moon
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Deeeeenmark
Posts: 547
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
Loving how Stoom is so diplomatic
As for the FC, just a "well done, you knocked our #1 player out of top 10" would of sufficed.
|
I'm apparently still top10, so the whole fc must have been a big fail..
Denial could have won this, but instead they were playing to nox's agenda, pranks. (3 nights in a row targeting 3 planets wtf), the denial flak waves were usually 3 times smaller than the main nox wave, so at my planet at least no-one from denial gained score, just the massive 20fleet nox waves. But hey, at least ronin had the guts to attack someone in top10. I doubt there's a denial/nox planet in the top25 I haven't roided or launched an attack at, we had a very fun, high profile round with that and I'm sure I've been the planet scanned most often for a fc oppertunity. Heck, I think I've landed once in 10 days.. sick and tired of this round and how selfish people can get 2 whole alliances behind them for boosting their planets only.
You should have kicked both of them when you felt like it rul3r
__________________
Golan - Ascendancy
Planets.
Zik: 3rd(r30), 4th(r52), 7th(r27), 9th(r26), 31st(r51)
Ter: 3rd(r50), 4th(r53), 4th(r37), 5th(r31) 7th (r58)
Xan: 3rd(r36), 40th(r57) 54th(r33), 104th(r29)
Cat: 8th (r54), 9th(r48), 12th (r55), 20th(r32), 77th(r23), 103rd(r38), 150th(r34), 152nd(r24),
Etd: 14th(r28)
Those damn emp races..
|
|
|
15 May 2008, 23:34
|
#88
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Agreed.
Denials tactics the last two weeks of this round are arguably the most shit in pa for a while.
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 00:58
|
#89
|
Tilting at windmills
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 579
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Nothing to do with the ~20mil in unncessary fleet crashes. You are right tho. 100% HC fault for not logging into their accounts and recalling fleets AND/OR calc'ing every single attack they ever launched. I wont make the same awful mistakes next round.
|
Well if you want to blame your members for the loss, I'm happy to let you...
__________________
[Fury] [1up] [Ascendancy]
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 01:04
|
#90
|
Up The Hatters!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles
Kargool is Ascendancy HC now muffinbrain. Get with the program and stop living in R25 dude.*
*That said it has been reported on the internet that Junglemuff lost his virginity in said round so I suppose some nostalgia is to be expected.
|
I dont know if I could ever be Ascendancy HC. The amount of alcohol required to fully function as an Ascendancy HC is just way to much for my poor liver
__________________
Planetarion veteran
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 01:06
|
#91
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooling
Well if you want to blame your members for the loss, I'm happy to let you...
|
Didn't say that, i was pointing out ur idiocy in claiming it was solely the HC's responsibility. But apparantly idiots prosper on this forum, so feel free to continue and u'll probably even make friends.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 01:53
|
#92
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
We've had the same mistakes venox. To be honest I've been staggered by the number of them. I would like to know who decided to land that fi/co wave on hude on the first night though. If anything really made us believe we could win it was that.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 02:08
|
#93
|
Tilting at windmills
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 579
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Didn't say that, i was pointing out ur idiocy in claiming it was solely the HC's responsibility. But apparantly idiots prosper on this forum, so feel free to continue and u'll probably even make friends.
|
Ascendancy had its fair share of retarded crashes. We even made a list, but gave up keeping track when it went past ten.
All other things being equal, I think I am still correct in my assessment.
__________________
[Fury] [1up] [Ascendancy]
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 05:29
|
#94
|
self-entitledly superior
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 341
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
We've had the same mistakes venox. To be honest I've been staggered by the number of them. I would like to know who decided to land that fi/co wave on hude on the first night though. If anything really made us believe we could win it was that.
|
I'm gonna take full credit if Ascendancy wins as it was all initiated by my ~1.2M crash on Xzar when I got stuck at work and couldn't recall, and then releasing my ~1.9M hidden prod which suddenly made me the best target in the universe! Superb strategy?
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 17:08
|
#95
|
Drunken Boozer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 298
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Great move Hude!!!
__________________
Geilheit ist KEINE Schande !!!!
! [ToT]-KC !
Äscendäncy, we got Penis inside!
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 19:16
|
#96
|
Up The Hatters!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooling
Ascendancy had its fair share of retarded crashes. We even made a list, but gave up keeping track when it went past ten.
All other things being equal, I think I am still correct in my assessment.
|
I made the stupid crash list twice! Do I get a cookie?
__________________
Planetarion veteran
|
|
|
16 May 2008, 20:13
|
#97
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North
Posts: 227
|
Re: We shall Stoom them on the beaches
/me gives kargool a cookie
__________________
Memento mori !
VisioN Forever!
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46.
| |