User Name
Password

Go Back   Planetarion Forums > Planetarion Related Forums > Planetarion Suggestions

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 19 Mar 2015, 23:32   #1
Remy
Ex-Head Multihunter
 
Remy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: At home
Posts: 900
Remy has much to be proud ofRemy has much to be proud ofRemy has much to be proud ofRemy has much to be proud ofRemy has much to be proud ofRemy has much to be proud ofRemy has much to be proud ofRemy has much to be proud of
Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

So,

I thought about this change when i learnt about it and thought: wth, why?

WHY?????

What is the benefit? YOu want to spread out ships over the different types you think of? Why would you ? Why does PA Team insist on making things up to make the game more and more static? Why on earth would you encourage ppl to move away from a perfectly valid strategy?

Same with the galaxy fund. Please just LET them! Why ruin another strategy?

Please PLEASE come to your senses and allow ppl their freedom! Ditch this stupid new feature.
__________________
R02.0-R4.0: [noob]
R05.0: [Wrath]/[Fury]
R06.0: Quit after 1 week
R7-9: Had an account, but didnt play seriously
R09.5: []LCH[] Officer
R10.0: []LCH[] HC (Rank #9, #1 Gal)
R10.5-R18.0: []LCH[] HC Scanner!
R18.0-R33 : Multihunter, Head MH
R34-.. : [CT] HC
Remy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20 Mar 2015, 00:08   #2
Tiamat101
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
Tiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

I actually quite like the idea. It prevents allys from just spamming 1 or 2 ships. It also makes people think of Different strats because they will ultimately have a 5-7% value increase over the allys that all have the same strat.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
Tiamat101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20 Mar 2015, 03:07   #3
Patrikc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 957
Patrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant future
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

I'm fairly indifferent to the ship cost variance, but I fail to see how encouraging people to build different ships would make the game more static.

The galaxy fund has been abused for long enough now and I'm glad something has finally been done.
Patrikc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20 Mar 2015, 09:11   #4
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

One the one side you dont like them removing a strategy(quite abusive one) and on the other side you dont like that they add something that adds a strategic element to the game ?
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20 Mar 2015, 21:19   #5
Mzyxptlk
mz.
Alien Invasion Champion, Submarine Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Barts Watersports Adventure Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Remy View Post
What is the benefit?
Ships that are recognized as better than others becoming slightly more expensive (and thus worse) as a result seems like a fairly reasonable change to me. Not a huge deal. I'm not sure why you're so upset about it.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
Mzyxptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 20 Mar 2015, 22:51   #6
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Its actualy a pretty good change.
Some alliances can gain from being "abnormal"
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 21 Mar 2015, 13:15   #7
Adapt
Leader Of The Gang
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 455
Adapt is just really niceAdapt is just really niceAdapt is just really niceAdapt is just really niceAdapt is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

i personally like these changes
__________________
Round 60 - Ultores - Rank 67th.
Round 75 - CT - Rank 19th - Galaxy Win.
Round 80 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 81 - Ultores - Rank 73rd.
Round 83 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 91 - Lucky7 - Rank 50th.
Round 92 - Lucky7 - Rank 39th.
Adapt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 21 Mar 2015, 19:57   #8
Tietäjä
Good Son
 
Tietäjä's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
Tietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better placeTietäjä single handedly makes these forums a better place
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

i can't understand how this limits people's freedom however
it's not like you can't build some ship or someone's forcing you to build another
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
Tietäjä is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 21 Mar 2015, 20:38   #9
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

well atm the formula is ****ed up and needs fixing or you can ditch it. rollback
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 21 Mar 2015, 21:26   #10
Tiamat101
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
Tiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

That might be something that happens but I do like the idea of it. Although it might be wise for it not to start till like tick 72 or something because +5% value on attack ships the first few days really favors the def.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
Tiamat101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 21 Mar 2015, 23:36   #11
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101 View Post
That might be something that happens but I do like the idea of it. Although it might be wise for it not to start till like tick 72 or something because +5% value on attack ships the first few days really favors the def.
You shouldve rushed CR/BS
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 01:04   #12
Tiamat101
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
Tiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Who's to say i didnt
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
Tiamat101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 10:22   #13
TheoDD
Registered User
Othello Champion, Solitaire Champion, Anime BlackJack Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
TheoDD has a spectacular aura aboutTheoDD has a spectacular aura about
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

I find it utterly shit, amongst several/all of the last changes.
I thought planetarion was in dire need of an upgrade, but this is just several steps backwards.
TheoDD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 11:45   #14
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoDD View Post
I find it utterly shit, amongst several/all of the last changes.
I thought planetarion was in dire need of an upgrade, but this is just several steps backwards.
how is this change shit?
in recent rounds stats been under critism, and this surely should have a impact on bad stats
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 16:52   #15
TheoDD
Registered User
Othello Champion, Solitaire Champion, Anime BlackJack Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
TheoDD has a spectacular aura aboutTheoDD has a spectacular aura about
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher View Post
how is this change shit?
in recent rounds stats been under critism, and this surely should have a impact on bad stats
in what sense does this change impact bad stats?
TheoDD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 17:41   #16
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoDD View Post
in what sense does this change impact bad stats?
Last round there was basicly no ziks, having this feature would made it more lucrative
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 18:09   #17
TheoDD
Registered User
Othello Champion, Solitaire Champion, Anime BlackJack Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
TheoDD has a spectacular aura aboutTheoDD has a spectacular aura about
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher View Post
Last round there was basicly no ziks, having this feature would made it more lucrative
how is this relevant to race selection?
TheoDD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 18:41   #18
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoDD View Post
how is this relevant to race selection?
Going something diffrent pays off?
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 20:15   #19
Influence
Finally retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
Influence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to behold
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher View Post
Going something diffrent pays off?
not really, as it's on a per race bases, so races that only have 1 viable fleet option are worse off than races that have multiple, making it harder to balance stats as all races 'need' a second viable option or they have a permanent value penalty.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]

In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN

Last edited by Influence; 22 Mar 2015 at 20:34.
Influence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 20:41   #20
Tiamat101
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
Tiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the roughTiamat101 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

I was under the impression after looking at the forumula that it wasnt race specific and that it accounted for all the ships in universe and those built less are going to be -% that being said if that is the case then yes going something different is quite lucrative also going Zik is quite lucrative because when your ships die to steal the % should drop and making the rebuy cheaper.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
Tiamat101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 21:02   #21
Influence
Finally retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
Influence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to behold
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Actually, nm me, it's not race specific, i misread it. Races that have less value do generally have cheaper ships.

current stats [PT49]

Race - Average Cost
Terran - 98.72%
Cathaar - 97.94%
Xandathrii - 97.08%
Zikonian - 98.33%
Eitraides - 100%

Class - Average Cost
Fighter - 102.39%
Corvette - 102.50%
Frigate - 97.36%
Destroyer - 97.86%
Cruiser - 95.00%
Battleship - 95.00%

also, currently there are only 3 ships that aren't at the far edge of the cost modifier, being:
Harpy - 104.78%
Viper - 101.49%
Phantom - 99.53%


DISCLAIMER: ships currently in production are not included in this calc.

P.S. I'll try to re-do this calc periodically, hopefully it will result in a nice chart at the end of the round
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]

In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN

Last edited by Influence; 22 Mar 2015 at 21:44.
Influence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 22 Mar 2015, 22:10   #22
Mzyxptlk
mz.
Alien Invasion Champion, Submarine Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Barts Watersports Adventure Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Yes, that would be interesting information to have. Please do!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
Mzyxptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 23 Mar 2015, 14:41   #23
Influence
Finally retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
Influence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to behold
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

for those that are interested in seeing the 'live' calculations for all ships. I've published a beta version of the results from my calc here

please keep in mind that updating is a manual process and that i am still working on improving the way the calc works internally so data isn't always 100% correct. Also, it's a calc based on the universe ship overview so it does not include ships in production, while the actual formula does.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]

In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
Influence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 23 Mar 2015, 15:40   #24
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Don't put to much work into theese numbers yet at the function isn't implemented as intended.
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 23 Mar 2015, 18:53   #25
Patrikc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 957
Patrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant future
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Why not simply do it based on total value ranking? For example, the 4 most built ships would be 5% extra, the next 4 4% extra, etc. down to the 4 least built ships which would be 5% cheaper.

It's not a perfect solution but it's much better than its current installment.
Patrikc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 23 Mar 2015, 21:22   #26
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

It would be very flawed to have it that way if there are many ships on about the same value level. But yeah it would be way better than what it is now, but I reckon its better to have it the way it was meant to be instead.
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 24 Mar 2015, 05:31   #27
Patrikc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 957
Patrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant future
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

I know, which is why I said it's not the perfect solution - it's a bandaid fix for this round that should be (relatively) easily implemented. I've yet to hear any ship be anything other than 5% up or down.
Patrikc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 24 Mar 2015, 06:36   #28
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

its just as hard to implement that as the real thing tho :P
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 24 Mar 2015, 08:59   #29
Patrikc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 957
Patrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant future
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

I'd argue that the 'real thing' would be a much more complex formula.
Patrikc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 24 Mar 2015, 09:17   #30
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

already gave him the formulas
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 26 Mar 2015, 01:50   #31
Influence
Finally retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
Influence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to behold
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Updated the calc with the new formula. keep in mind the calc does not include ships in production, and as such the ouputvalues isn't the actual cost. Especially early round, ships in production can have quite a bit of impact on the calc.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]

In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
Influence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 26 Mar 2015, 01:54   #32
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

yeah finally working as intended good it got fixed this early before it gives a real impact on the round.
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 27 Mar 2015, 18:09   #33
Davidsr
Old User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Davidsr is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Davidsr .. I really do not care what they do. I will still play.

Good luck
Davidsr
Davidsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 27 Mar 2015, 18:50   #34
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

they fixed it
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 27 Mar 2015, 22:25   #35
Mzyxptlk
mz.
Alien Invasion Champion, Submarine Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Barts Watersports Adventure Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

Unrelatedly, every time I skim the title of this thread I think it's spam. :(
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
Mzyxptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 29 Mar 2015, 01:09   #36
Patrikc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 957
Patrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant futurePatrikc has a brilliant future
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

If only, then it would be deleted.
Patrikc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 29 Apr 2015, 19:24   #37
Nitros
Internal Error
 
Nitros's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
Nitros is a splendid one to beholdNitros is a splendid one to beholdNitros is a splendid one to beholdNitros is a splendid one to beholdNitros is a splendid one to beholdNitros is a splendid one to beholdNitros is a splendid one to behold
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

As this feature was first introduced this round, I must say I enjoyed it.
There's your feedback.
__________________
Nitros

[]LCH[] ..lets change history
Nitros is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 30 Apr 2015, 07:32   #38
Blue_Esper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
Blue_Esper is a glorious beacon of lightBlue_Esper is a glorious beacon of lightBlue_Esper is a glorious beacon of lightBlue_Esper is a glorious beacon of lightBlue_Esper is a glorious beacon of lightBlue_Esper is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

i wouldn't mind seeing a +/-10% for next round
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
Blue_Esper is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 30 Apr 2015, 08:40   #39
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: Production cost variance -5% to +5% new in R61 - Ditch it (Its a suggestion!)

after it got fixed it worked great. 10% is too much imo
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018