|
21 May 2003, 22:35
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 9
|
top pure NAR gal from round 9.
just read the thread about rd9 top vom gal.
does anyone know which was the top NAR gal and plannet?
__________________
r4 cant remember
r6 4:22:2
r9 3:8:1
|
|
|
21 May 2003, 22:38
|
#2
|
wasted
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Under the floorboards
Posts: 1,240
|
I'll hazard a guess and say 41:10. Anyone know of a higher one?
__________________
“They were totally confused,” said the birdman, whose flying suit gives him a passing resemblance to Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story. “The authorities said that I was an unregistered aircraft and to fly, you need a licence. I told them, ‘No. To fly, you need wings’.”
|
|
|
21 May 2003, 22:39
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
30:9:3 (RaH) for planet isn't it?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
21 May 2003, 23:29
|
#4
|
NewDawn pe0n
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: #NewDawn
Posts: 313
|
If it's really 41:10 that's quite sad as most of them quitted ages ago
Guess I'll have to check it tomorrow when I'm not so sleepy.
__________________
NewDawn
|
|
|
21 May 2003, 23:31
|
#5
|
NewDawn pe0n
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: #NewDawn
Posts: 313
|
Quote:
Originally posted by JonnyBGood
30:9:3 (RaH) for planet isn't it?
|
I do belive 18:2:9 (ND) was bigger when ticks stopped, could be wrong though.
__________________
NewDawn
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 02:23
|
#7
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
18:2:9 was higher, but i know for a fact MobRulz(30:9:3) wasn't fencesitting. Like other RaH members in our gal we hit eclipse etc as and when we wanted and took the consequences.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 02:44
|
#8
|
Eclipse High Command
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eclipse
Posts: 1,144
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Shev
18:2:9 was higher, but i know for a fact MobRulz(30:9:3) wasn't fencesitting. Like other RaH members in our gal we hit eclipse etc as and when we wanted and took the consequences.
|
wrong
30:9:3 didnt hit or defend vs eclipse, otherwise he would have lost galaxyprotection once and for all, especially in the late game offences were immideately punished and no further protection was established after that. This means once out, out forever.
__________________
We fight together,
We win together,
or we die together.
-T&P slogan
Focht
T&P HC
Fury Exec
Eclipse CEO
Stan's muppet
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 06:15
|
#9
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Possibly not in the later game, but he definitely hit eclipse during the NAR/WEET war. He might not have landed due to defence, but he still launched.
Fortunatly for us you never did remove our protection, even though some of us RaH attacked Eclipse and ToT more than once.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 06:25
|
#10
|
vacation-monkey
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 136
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TehVader
If it's really 41:10 that's quite sad as most of them quitted ages ago
Guess I'll have to check it tomorrow when I'm not so sleepy.
|
you just realised this game is sad
I think we were the best before stagnation hit during the WEET vs NaR war.
__________________
to succeed is not enough, others must fail
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 07:41
|
#11
|
NewDawn pe0n
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: #NewDawn
Posts: 313
|
Then you guys rock more than I thought
gg Friends and Foes
And I find it hard to belive that 30:9:3 attacked/deffed vs Eclipse in the later half of the round when targets started getting few for the top players, although if I'm wrong then congrats to him aswelll
__________________
NewDawn
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 08:21
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 9
|
If we dont count 30:9 cos it has an Eclipse Tag, is 3:4 the highest pure NAR? I know they have some Vom and some Vtx but they dont have any WEET alliances.
__________________
r4 cant remember
r6 4:22:2
r9 3:8:1
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 08:49
|
#13
|
180º
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 397
|
41:10 becasue they rocked, had to over kill them to kill them... thnx for copuple of days of fun "cluster war"
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 11:42
|
#14
|
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 15
|
41:2 was pure NaR at the start of the round, and didn't have arbiter protection from any alliances except NaR. We did get one in ToT and later one in WP, but nothing stopped any of em to attack us. And the WP and ToT members weren't the biggest in our gal either.
Finished a few spots above 41:10 but don't know if we get accounted for. Im sure some other NaR gal finished in top100?
__________________
-Max-
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 13:05
|
#15
|
180º
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 397
|
hehe 41:2 was much easier to kill than 41:10..
to bad i attacked the one tot member while i was tot
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 13:22
|
#16
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
1 day before the end of the 'offical' round we were rank 100. On the last day or GC killed himself on some top planet.
SO we ended rank 116, If I am correct.
We had 1 tot guy in our gal ( who was account sharing) and 1Wp guy who got kicked out of WP when nar/weet war started
Rest of us were like this:
16 2 1: Spirit (former GC) (Nos/Seraphim)
16 2 2: Karok (new GC old MOD) (ETY)
16 2 3: Nis (TOT)
16 2 4: Xpok (NOS)
16 2 5: Termo (MOW) (NOS)
16 2 6: Kingwilly (ETY)
16 2 7: Stimpy (Pack) kicked out when nar/weet war started
16 2 8: Martok (Chaoz)
16 2 9: Jellinek (hirr)
16 2 10: General1 (MOC) (RAH)
Seeing this we were 1 of the top NAR gals around.
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 13:26
|
#17
|
Guy next door
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,745
|
when a galaxy can end up top100 while Gen is being the MoC
something is really wrong with Planetarion nowadays
lo gen, sign up for the speedround fs
__________________
..look
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 13:28
|
#18
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SilverSmoke
when a galaxy can end up top100 while Gen is being the MoC
something is really wrong with Planetarion nowadays
lo gen, sign up for the speedround fs
|
Lo hun, got no time, will play rd 9.5 very inactive etc etc etc.
AND I ROX (sometimes)
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 13:51
|
#19
|
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 15
|
@Mademan:
We weren't killed as easily as you claimed. We climbed back, else we wouldnt have had our ending score/roids.
And to add to that our roid rank was 83'rd so we still had some more left to grow. You might have managed to roid some of us, but we did have a frigging lot of incomming for some weeks. And compared to that amount we did quite well. And we also did take some roids off your galaxy. So to say we died was kinda unfair i would say.
And our main troubles was getting enough defence for the non RaH in gal. Fleetswapping is effective
__________________
-Max-
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 14:25
|
#20
|
Imposter?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK / Canada
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Razorback
wrong
30:9:3 didnt hit or defend vs eclipse, otherwise he would have lost galaxyprotection once and for all, especially in the late game offences were immideately punished and no further protection was established after that. This means once out, out forever.
|
Hahhaa
Sent him against Eclipse myself several times, both in attack and defence. Damn Focht, you missed a planet you could have roided in an Eclipse galaxy !
__________________
Æ - from the ashes of good intentions come forth lasting friendships... the Æternals.
R2: XXV
R3: Æternals
R4: Fx9/Wolfpack
R5: Legion
R6: Legion BC
R7: Legion BC
R8: RaH BC
R9: RaH HC
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 14:31
|
#21
|
Imposter?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK / Canada
Posts: 717
|
Re: top pure NAR gal from round 9.
Just before the end of the NaR/WeeT war my gal was the #1 pure 'not WeeT' galaxy after our 2 WeeT got kicked for being inactive. Was kinda proved by the fact there was fights over who actually booked us and we were often hit by several organised raids at the same time. Of course soon after this I started moving house, the rest of the galaxy went inactive and we dropped dramatically.
As for top Pure 'NaR' galaxy i would hazard a guess at Werewolf's galaxy (41:10 I think) - naturally we didn't pay attention to the 'Na' after we left tho.
From a RaH perspective our top planets were in 30:9, who due to the simple fact that they were not kicked shows they weren't fence sitting.
__________________
Æ - from the ashes of good intentions come forth lasting friendships... the Æternals.
R2: XXV
R3: Æternals
R4: Fx9/Wolfpack
R5: Legion
R6: Legion BC
R7: Legion BC
R8: RaH BC
R9: RaH HC
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 15:12
|
#22
|
Winker
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: IOW
Posts: 319
|
Well Im sure the thread was asking who was the highest pure NAR galaxy.
So basically anyone who had even one planet in another alliance surely don't qualify.
Which means its my galaxy instead
__________________
prestel
Yeah so what Im an Original Pr0nstar
some of us have serious jobs
Last edited by Little Timmy; 22 May 2003 at 15:17.
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 15:29
|
#23
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Re: Re: top pure NAR gal from round 9.
Quote:
Originally posted by Maddix
As for top Pure 'NaR' galaxy i would hazard a guess at Werewolf's galaxy (41:10 I think) - naturally we didn't pay attention to the 'Na' after we left tho.
|
We ended higher................ and 1 tot planet who is inactive and a multi doesnt count
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 16:44
|
#24
|
Imposter?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK / Canada
Posts: 717
|
Re: Re: Re: top pure NAR gal from round 9.
Quote:
Originally posted by General1
We ended higher................ and 1 tot planet who is inactive and a multi doesnt count
|
You were in your galaxy tho, immediately disqualifies it from being able to take any credit in ever achieving anything
(wub u Gen1 )
__________________
Æ - from the ashes of good intentions come forth lasting friendships... the Æternals.
R2: XXV
R3: Æternals
R4: Fx9/Wolfpack
R5: Legion
R6: Legion BC
R7: Legion BC
R8: RaH BC
R9: RaH HC
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 21:59
|
#25
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: top pure NAR gal from round 9.
Quote:
Originally posted by Maddix
You were in your galaxy tho, immediately disqualifies it from being able to take any credit in ever achieving anything
(wub u Gen1 )
|
Luv U 2
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 22:17
|
#26
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
40:5 was a pretty high VoM errrr .... WEET/NaR eeeee .. WER gal too.
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Iuvat
|
|
|
22 May 2003, 22:27
|
#27
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Knight Theamion
40:5 was a pretty high VoM errrr .... WEET/NaR eeeee .. WER gal too.
|
PLD
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
23 May 2003, 00:22
|
#28
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Razorback
wrong
30:9:3 didnt hit or defend vs eclipse, otherwise he would have lost galaxyprotection once and for all, especially in the late game offences were immideately punished and no further protection was established after that. This means once out, out forever.
|
ya that's true, happened with my planet aswell (and I didn't even attack Eclipse).
rgds Kj
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
23 May 2003, 07:17
|
#29
|
180º
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LanMan
@Mademan:
We weren't killed as easily as you claimed. We climbed back, else we wouldnt have had our ending score/roids.
And to add to that our roid rank was 83'rd so we still had some more left to grow. You might have managed to roid some of us, but we did have a frigging lot of incomming for some weeks. And compared to that amount we did quite well. And we also did take some roids off your galaxy. So to say we died was kinda unfair i would say.
And our main troubles was getting enough defence for the non RaH in gal. Fleetswapping is effective
|
Well after our attack we didnt see much more off u, u where dead in our eyes.
|
|
|
23 May 2003, 16:20
|
#30
|
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 15
|
@Mademan
Well atleast our spirits must have been higher then ur gal, as your gal was 90mill while we were still beeing bashed everytime we were close to reaching 30mill until some time after the We/Et war broke out.
Finishing we were less then 10mill behind your gal, and with a higher roid count then your galaxy.
Might be a parallell to the NOTDEAD galaxies of Furgion back in R6, when Furgion was considered dead, but yet managed to climb back due to beeing allowed to, and having the fighting spirit to do so. Remember, it's not over til it's over.
__________________
-Max-
|
|
|
24 May 2003, 01:09
|
#31
|
Land Based Biped
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Moon
Posts: 113
|
8:8 rocked
__________________
/me spins
|
|
|
27 May 2003, 11:26
|
#32
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 284
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LanMan
41:2 was pure NaR at the start of the round, and didn't have arbiter protection from any alliances except NaR. We did get one in ToT and later one in WP, but nothing stopped any of em to attack us. And the WP and ToT members weren't the biggest in our gal either.
Finished a few spots above 41:10 but don't know if we get accounted for. Im sure some other NaR gal finished in top100?
|
3:8 had no WeeT nor VVOMM-members and ended up #87
ETY, hirr and ND were all there
__________________
thx for reading
|
|
|
31 May 2003, 18:20
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DrNick
8:8 rocked
|
Indeed!
(DiabZ at Zuthies comp)
|
|
|
1 Jun 2003, 09:13
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 6
|
I was in 32:1 we had a WP member and the rest was IPC/NoS I think we ended up in top 100. Rank 91 is listed on toolkit. So I guess we were a NaR galaxy in top 100
__________________
-Ellep
|
|
|
1 Jun 2003, 16:38
|
#35
|
Daddy.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: #nfu
Posts: 627
|
41:10 played well throughout - they were part of Praetorian Guard (our bg), and did remain true to NaR.
And let me inform GREATONE that when the WEET from my gal launched on them - i did not. As i felt quite bad when two Praetorian Gal's hit each other - never the less this was simply down to politics and there was _fk all_ i could of done.
Good to see you guys rocking though - well played
-Necro
__________________
Arrogance
|
|
|
1 Jun 2003, 21:02
|
#36
|
Over the moon
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Deeeeenmark
Posts: 547
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Little Timmy
Well Im sure the thread was asking who was the highest pure NAR galaxy.
So basically anyone who had even one planet in another alliance surely don't qualify.
Which means its my galaxy instead
|
boooo, had you quit rah we would have been top allianceless gal
__________________
Golan - Ascendancy
Planets.
Zik: 3rd(r30), 4th(r52), 7th(r27), 9th(r26), 31st(r51)
Ter: 3rd(r50), 4th(r53), 4th(r37), 5th(r31) 7th (r58)
Xan: 3rd(r36), 40th(r57) 54th(r33), 104th(r29)
Cat: 8th (r54), 9th(r48), 12th (r55), 20th(r32), 77th(r23), 103rd(r38), 150th(r34), 152nd(r24),
Etd: 14th(r28)
Those damn emp races..
|
|
|
2 Jun 2003, 21:34
|
#37
|
aka Werewolf
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 42
|
oo was my gal top pure nar GAL omfg thinking gc stopped playing after he got wiped =( and rest too we where 4 ppl playing somehow after the smackdown on our planets
__________________
r6 31:18:4 Wolf_Fin of [Cell]BC/[Deus]
r7 23:6:11 Fenris of [RaH]BC
r8 21:7:6 Fenris of Howling Bloodlust 31mill 2,8k rocks [RaH]BC
r9 41:10:9 M33pM33p of The roidrunner[RaH]BC
R9.5 33:2:9 The Love Boat Will Be Making Another Run 3543 37.991.952 [LDK]
r 20 2 5 11 TheLoveBoat IsComeingForYou Zik 821 [RaH] VGN
r 26 8:2:6 Werewolf NoX Zik 1736 6116805
R 46 FaNG BC/DC
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18.
| |