Quote:
Originally Posted by Prover
All Systems Go: You clearly did not consider my previous replies because I've largely clarified (and corrected) many of the things you're questioning.
|
I have read most of what was said. I did not understand it so I read the original post. I also did not understand that.
Quote:
Do people not know how proper communication works? I have no idea what you're trying to say in a long post with a bunch of destructive questions.
|
I think you use too many words. The questions were questions, sometimes with a disagreement. But mainly questions. These were posted in the hope that answers were forthcoming.
Quote:
Understand: nobody is teaching here; learning comes from within. Please write in complete paragraphs and try to limit your questions to a few, so to help bridge our communication gap.
|
This isn't about learning. It's about understand what you are trying to say.
The questions are plentiful to facilitate shorter answers. A block of writing does not seem to be an approriate way of asking questions about something that is not clearly understood.
Quote:
The discussion came down to a fundamental difference in our scientific understanding as I explained in post #31. Do try to keep up.
|
Unfortunatly, that post was bollocks.
Quote:
The difference between us is that I don't assume to know even 1% about the nature of reality, whereas you (materialists) assume the nature of reality is all we can know. Let's focus on settling this distinction.
|
These aren't mutually exclusive viewpoints. In fact, I would say that outside of extreme circles (which may not actually exist) no-one with any sanity would claim we know more than a fraction of the materialistic world.
I'm not sure if you're implying that there is a world outside of the one we experience, but if there is hwo can we even begin to understand it?