|
22 Dec 2004, 13:40
|
#1
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
end of round rankings
i assume it will be the same as last round where somebody who knows everyone posts the top 100 planets IRC nicks and alliances (once the round is over ofc). would it be possible to add to this list or start a further thread showing weather each planet in the top 100, was NAPed to 1UP or not. not to insult anyone or anything but would be really curious to find out how many/who in the top 100 fencesat and protected rank.
i feel it will show where 1UP's true victory lay this round.
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 13:47
|
#2
|
Forever Noob
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 321
|
Re: end of round rankings
So 1up nap now equels fencesitting..... Fencesitting would be if you had a NAP with LCH and 1up, not one or the other.
__________________
<Zhil> I order the immediate return of my property
<Zhil> No 1up member should steal from another
<[MO]Forest> no 1up should attcak a 1up gal without permission form hc
<Zhil> I am HC
<Zhil> I gave myself permission
<[MO]Forest> i meant a proper hc, not a hc who would suicide into his MO's fleet
Played r4-9.5 r12-14 Now retired.
Proud to have been Cosmic Frostbite (r12 - 22:5 - #1 gal)
Forever [4D] - LCH, ND, Absolute, TFD, DLR
Might and greed will never outweigh honor and loyalty!
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 13:49
|
#3
|
Forever Noob
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 321
|
Re: end of round rankings
Would still be interesting to see though yeah
__________________
<Zhil> I order the immediate return of my property
<Zhil> No 1up member should steal from another
<[MO]Forest> no 1up should attcak a 1up gal without permission form hc
<Zhil> I am HC
<Zhil> I gave myself permission
<[MO]Forest> i meant a proper hc, not a hc who would suicide into his MO's fleet
Played r4-9.5 r12-14 Now retired.
Proud to have been Cosmic Frostbite (r12 - 22:5 - #1 gal)
Forever [4D] - LCH, ND, Absolute, TFD, DLR
Might and greed will never outweigh honor and loyalty!
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 13:53
|
#4
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: end of round rankings
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 14:07
|
#5
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: end of round rankings
i think they did idd do this last round. it was indicated if the planet was none napped or not. Yes, if 1up punked you this round and you didn't attack them, you sat on a great big fence.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 14:15
|
#6
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: end of round rankings
Indeed, this will be happening
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 16:23
|
#7
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orion Treet
So 1up nap now equels fencesitting..... Fencesitting would be if you had a NAP with LCH and 1up, not one or the other.
|
if an LCH member has a planetory nap with 1up, you can call that fencesitting give that both alliances are/were at war.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 16:28
|
#8
|
U've been Moderated
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: getting sex0red by pretty women
Posts: 1,510
|
Re: end of round rankings
anyone in a 1up gal napped to 1up (who really cares bout lch...............) is a fencesitter really
__________________
Titans forever and ever.
<Forest> i fuc*ing hate password sharers, i will log into macs bros account and get scans every 2 mins
<Tempestuous> cypher just happens to be the world's cutest creature
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 16:45
|
#9
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by cypher
anyone in a 1up gal napped to 1up (who really cares bout lch...............) is a fencesitter really
|
I this round it would been called fence sitting, 10 rounds ago it wouldnt
I think its realy fence sitting when you dont defend against 1up and stuff...
except that, i would call it playing for the gal if a 1up planet landed in your gal randomly
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 17:02
|
#10
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: end of round rankings
ND are fencesitters
true story
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 17:34
|
#11
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: end of round rankings
Well IMO fencesitting is being NAPed (either/or not attacking/defending against) to a alliance hostile or neutral to your own end of story!
you should not attack your alliance, your alliances allies, or neutrals that HC don't want to fight with.
anyone who would not hit an ally target of any alliance because of a NAP (personal or galaxy) is a fencesitter.
however i do take issue with the HC's of alliances who knew about it and allowed it as much as the players thamselves.
cowardice on all sides as far as i can see and it would be nice to know who these ppl are and how widespread in the top 100 this is. and maybe se reasons why some ppl are in the top 100 to start with.
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 18:55
|
#12
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by barney
Well IMO fencesitting is being NAPed (either/or not attacking/defending against) to a alliance hostile or neutral to your own end of story!
you should not attack your alliance, your alliances allies, or neutrals that HC don't want to fight with.
anyone who would not hit an ally target of any alliance because of a NAP (personal or galaxy) is a fencesitter.
however i do take issue with the HC's of alliances who knew about it and allowed it as much as the players thamselves.
cowardice on all sides as far as i can see and it would be nice to know who these ppl are and how widespread in the top 100 this is. and maybe se reasons why some ppl are in the top 100 to start with.
|
I realy disagree, not defending against an allie is one thing, but i realy disagree that a member of a gal wont hit the alliances of the gal.
It is this new way of PA that calls gal cooporation a pure fence sit.
I would avoid to attack any alliance of my gal if know of it.
gal > alliance is what i mean.
But it will allways giving you problems with your own alliance if you cannot attack an spesified aliance cus you got an member of that certain alliance in the gal, and you just want to make peace not war
Fence sitting in my point of view is when people reject attacking an leading alliance to save his own roids.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 19:01
|
#13
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Re: end of round rankings
Anyone with a NAP with 1up that's not in 1up or ND is fencesitting tbh. Whether or not you agree with ND's stance, they are allied. Anyone else should have been happy to target 1up. Those who didn't contributed nothing really and deserve no respect for it.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 19:07
|
#14
|
Knight of Ni!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oslo Norway
Posts: 298
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shev
Anyone with a NAP with 1up that's not in 1up or ND is fencesitting tbh. Whether or not you agree with ND's stance, they are allied. Anyone else should have been happy to target 1up. Those who didn't contributed nothing really and deserve no respect for it.
|
add wp nos tof and 1 more ally to that list
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 19:18
|
#15
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 702
|
Re: end of round rankings
well lets say that lot of alliance are napped to 1up, then add to this fact that a lot of individual are napped to 1up aswell so that put us (Angels) in a position which we get a lot more targeted by 1up and co because other players are just coward wanker and shameless players who prefer individual ranking than their alliances.
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 19:33
|
#16
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
ND are fencesitters
true story
|
Then Lokken is the first fencesitting mod
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 19:33
|
#17
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by alch
well lets say that lot of alliance are napped to 1up, then add to this fact that a lot of individual are napped to 1up aswell so that put us (Angels) in a position which we get a lot more targeted by 1up and co because other players are just coward wanker and shameless players who prefer individual ranking than their alliances.
|
indeed, you tell em girl
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
22 Dec 2004, 20:11
|
#18
|
the Sacred Pervert
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,492
|
Re: end of round rankings
dont think anybody's gonna claim a nap with 1up because of the mortification of being branded as a "fencesitter"..although it'll be really interesting to see, some naps with 1up posted beside these people's names on end of round rankings might just be mostly based on pure speculation..
__________________
"....some might say, we will find a brighter day...."
-Oasis
Veneratio | Insomnia | F-Crew | Subh
Last edited by demiGOD; 22 Dec 2004 at 22:42.
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 00:23
|
#19
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by demiGOD
dont think anybody's gonna claim a nap with 1up because of the mortification of being branded as a "fencesitter"..although it'll be really interesting to see, some naps with 1up posted beside these people's names on end of round rankings might just be mostly based on pure speculation..
|
Cocteu and Elviz, 2 huge planets (top 5 for much of the round), members of LCH, who refused to attack 1up for hte majority of the round. There are plenty of fencesitters around, and they really helped to gift wrap 1up's hard fought victory.
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 00:40
|
#20
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I realy disagree, not defending against an allie is one thing, but i realy disagree that a member of a gal wont hit the alliances of the gal.
It is this new way of PA that calls gal cooporation a pure fence sit.
I would avoid to attack any alliance of my gal if know of it.
gal > alliance is what i mean.
But it will allways giving you problems with your own alliance if you cannot attack an spesified aliance cus you got an member of that certain alliance in the gal, and you just want to make peace not war
Fence sitting in my point of view is when people reject attacking an leading alliance to save his own roids.
|
So as long as you have an enemy in your gal you are quite happy to advocate leaving the rest of your alliance to fight a long bitter war and often loose. while you sit there quietly growing saving your own roids.
it is quite easy to have cooperation in a gal without NAPing everybody i have HR/VsN/ND/MISTU/NoS in my gal, i have hit ND and NoS a lot this round, on attacks with alliance and solo's. and im sure those from ND and NoS have hit VsN/LCH/ etc..., those from the other alliances know this and understand this.
yet when i need defence they are the first there, and when they need defence i am the first there are you so small minded that you can't see that most ppl look past alliances when defending ingal, it shouldn't matter what alliance they are from. it helps to be good freinds as they can get to you on ETA 5 if for no other reason.
imo alliance politics stay away from galaxy politics, and it has worked out like that in my gal, and tbh anyone who can't see that will im sure sorely miss that ETA5 def, their loss
BTW if you take that attitude and don't attack alliances with members in your gal, do your allym8's know that?, i really hope im not one of them
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 00:46
|
#21
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by demiGOD
dont think anybody's gonna claim a nap with 1up because of the mortification of being branded as a "fencesitter"..although it'll be really interesting to see, some naps with 1up posted beside these people's names on end of round rankings might just be mostly based on pure speculation..
|
Last round 1up stated which planets had a NAP with them - it's reasonable to hope for something similar this round.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 03:06
|
#22
|
the Sacred Pervert
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,492
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shev
Last round 1up stated which planets had a NAP with them - it's reasonable to hope for something similar this round.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
Cocteu and Elviz, 2 huge planets (top 5 for much of the round), members of LCH, who refused to attack 1up for hte majority of the round. There are plenty of fencesitters around, and they really helped to gift wrap 1up's hard fought victory.
|
-then we should look forward to seeing the list of these fencesitting fencesitters for this round.. be advised, a lot of them will be in denial of fencesitting, but what the heck! we'll have fun with it!
__________________
"....some might say, we will find a brighter day...."
-Oasis
Veneratio | Insomnia | F-Crew | Subh
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 12:46
|
#23
|
U've been Moderated
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: getting sex0red by pretty women
Posts: 1,510
|
Re: end of round rankings
tbh if members are fencesitting... blame the hc's and leave them or something, get them kicked from the alliance. because quite simply. aslong as HC allows members to fencesit THEY are to blame and NO-ONE else.
they should be kicked and roided then if hc don't want fencesitters, but the HC's are playing for the ranks, cuz without the scores of those said fencesitters, their alliances are nothing.
and if members complain they should leave, i wouldn't want to be in an alliance where everyone fencesits...
__________________
Titans forever and ever.
<Forest> i fuc*ing hate password sharers, i will log into macs bros account and get scans every 2 mins
<Tempestuous> cypher just happens to be the world's cutest creature
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 17:45
|
#24
|
Behe
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 540
|
Re: end of round rankings
There are mainly 2 types of players in PA. Those who play for their alliance, and those who play for themselves.
I think those who play for themselves out number those who play for their alliance, so their number one prioritiy will always be their planets. Hence Fencesitting. Last round a nice fencesitters list was put out and yet HC's still allowed these players back this round. (Or accepted them from other alliances)
The only way an alliance can win in this game is by sheer military might or by having 90-100% loyal members.
I think after 14 rounds HCs know this, my question is why do they keep letting these selfish fence sitters back in, or take them in from other alliances, knowing that by doing so, there is a slim chance they will be able to win the round?
__________________
Once in awhile you get shown the light,
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 17:49
|
#25
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: end of round rankings
serial incompetence
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 18:02
|
#26
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fyodor
There are mainly 2 types of players in PA. Those who play for their alliance, and those who play for themselves.
I think those who play for themselves out number those who play for their alliance, so their number one prioritiy will always be their planets. Hence Fencesitting. Last round a nice fencesitters list was put out and yet HC's still allowed these players back this round. (Or accepted them from other alliances)
The only way an alliance can win in this game is by sheer military might or by having 90-100% loyal members.
I think after 14 rounds HCs know this, my question is why do they keep letting these selfish fence sitters back in, or take them in from other alliances, knowing that by doing so, there is a slim chance they will be able to win the round?
|
Would be nice to see if alliance HC's not accept them (back) this time, unless they renounce this style of selfish play, however unlikely this is.
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 21:05
|
#27
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: end of round rankings
actually going to be a list or is this just gonna be a discussion bout fencesitting?
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 21:08
|
#28
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
actually going to be a list or is this just gonna be a discussion bout fencesitting?
|
twas intended to be a list which i egerly await.
seams to have been turned into a discussion tho :P
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 21:30
|
#29
|
Stolen
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 487
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
actually going to be a list or is this just gonna be a discussion bout fencesitting?
|
"<[1up]Syn_Sid> And thanks to all fence-sitting enemies - without your spinelessness, none of this would be possible."
haha - priceless....this rounds best comment :P
__________________
Who, me?
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 21:34
|
#30
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by MotoX
"<[1up]Syn_Sid> And thanks to all fence-sitting enemies - without your spinelessness, none of this would be possible."
haha - priceless....this rounds best comment :P
|
agree'd i pointed and laughed at a few ppl at this point too :P
BTW any eta on the rankings / nicks / spineless list im looking forward to it
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 21:41
|
#31
|
Eclipse High Command
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eclipse
Posts: 1,144
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fyodor
There are mainly 2 types of players in PA. Those who play for their alliance, and those who play for themselves.
I think those who play for themselves out number those who play for their alliance, so their number one prioritiy will always be their planets. Hence Fencesitting. Last round a nice fencesitters list was put out and yet HC's still allowed these players back this round. (Or accepted them from other alliances)
The only way an alliance can win in this game is by sheer military might or by having 90-100% loyal members.
I think after 14 rounds HCs know this, my question is why do they keep letting these selfish fence sitters back in, or take them in from other alliances, knowing that by doing so, there is a slim chance they will be able to win the round?
|
the same reasons most alliances accept defectors or former cheaters (fang never had issues with that) or ppl who are generally critical egos.
They can often play well and generate score / roids / activity.
Some alliances ever accept ppl back in who actively tried to ruin one round or tried to split an alliance (Irvine anyone?)
Afterall its a game.....
__________________
We fight together,
We win together,
or we die together.
-T&P slogan
Focht
T&P HC
Fury Exec
Eclipse CEO
Stan's muppet
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 22:03
|
#32
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razorback
the same reasons most alliances accept defectors or former cheaters (fang never had issues with that) or ppl who are generally critical egos.
They can often play well and generate score / roids / activity.
Some alliances ever accept ppl back in who actively tried to ruin one round or tried to split an alliance (Irvine anyone?)
Afterall its a game.....
|
grow up you little child. With every post you make you try your best to throw cheap immature digs at fang. I'm pretty tired of that childish behavior really. Becides, this reply shows how clueless you sometimes are.
How about you let the past be the past, and stop being the little boy who keeps on giving digs over and over about something the entire world has already whined about.
I'm not even gonna dignify this with a discussion, it's just not worth it.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 22:05
|
#33
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: end of round rankings
Code:
Top 100 Planets
Rank Coord Irc Nick Alliance
1 22:05:10 aif 1up
2 22:05:02 TeK "
3 28:06:04 cypher "
4 34:07:04 Artanys "
5 23:07:01 Mazzelaar "
6 03:09:01 Chika " till last 3 days
7 30:09:03 PaPaA 1up
8 02:03:02 Kaifux "
9 31:03:03 Titos VGN
10 31:03:04 elviz LCH
11 23:07:09 Kileman 1up
12 23:07:02 Synthetic_Sid 1up
13 34:07:05 mens WP(?)
14 22:05:03 Rabbagast WP
15 34:03:01 pdmaster 1up
16 31:03:10 Benneh
17 31:03:05 cocteau LCH
18 31:03:01 Nauti 1up
19 22:05:04 NitinA WP
20 10:10:10 Sandman 1up
21 22:05:01 Stals 1up
22 06:04:10
23 34:03:04 Livewire ND
24 34:07:03 cata
25 11:09:08
26 13:05:03 destiny
27 05:07:01 CarDinaL 1up
28 31:03:02 Buddah
29 03:08:10 suave 1up
30 24:01:09
31 35:08:04 t0ne 1up
32 28:06:03 Thorm 1up
33 22:05:09 HansA
34 35:03:04
35 03:06:09 DeSSe 1up
36 29:08:02 Micka 1up
37 33:05:01 DeLoS 1up
38 05:02:05
39 23:03:04 Exor 1up
40 06:02:06 Cameron
41 28:06:01 panick VsN
42 31:02:03
43 22:05:06 Orion
44 05:09:02 MiX LCH
45 30:01:06 Forest shocking I know
46 35:01:01 Almeida HR(?)
47 05:02:02
48 06:07:04
49 06:02:04 NolliE 1up
50 36:02:04
51 11:01:02 Bashar 1up
52 04:08:03
53 36:02:01
54 13:05:01 Snake_Eyes
55 14:05:04 d-sun
56 35:01:04 Spezies
57 04:03:02
58 33:05:02
59 14:02:02 Late
60 30:07:04
61 32:10:01
62 03:08:03 Hearne 1up
63 10:03:02
64 06:07:10
65 06:07:03
66 30:07:03
67 27:01:03
68 36:02:03
69 11:02:10
70 13:10:02
71 05:09:01 MDK^MAN LCH
72 03:09:04
73 20:06:04
74 01:07:03
75 08:02:04
76 07:07:01
77 27:01:01
78 15:06:04
79 14:02:01 CrazyMike
80 32:03:01 Azurewrath 1up
81 11:02:01
82 31:03:07
83 35:01:05
84 24:08:05
85 16:10:08
86 30:01:01
87 13:05:05
88 22:05:05 yupster 1up
89 22:02:01
90 35:03:03 jesterina 1up
91 21:02:04
92 22:03:02
93 07:05:07
94 26:07:01
95 16:04:05
96 30:10:03
97 10:10:04 Gio2k
98 31:09:04
99 15:06:08
100 35:01:03
just basic stuff i knew etc, add & update at your leisure
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 22:13
|
#34
|
Forever Noob
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 321
|
Re: end of round rankings
43 22:05:06 Orion <--- ND
__________________
<Zhil> I order the immediate return of my property
<Zhil> No 1up member should steal from another
<[MO]Forest> no 1up should attcak a 1up gal without permission form hc
<Zhil> I am HC
<Zhil> I gave myself permission
<[MO]Forest> i meant a proper hc, not a hc who would suicide into his MO's fleet
Played r4-9.5 r12-14 Now retired.
Proud to have been Cosmic Frostbite (r12 - 22:5 - #1 gal)
Forever [4D] - LCH, ND, Absolute, TFD, DLR
Might and greed will never outweigh honor and loyalty!
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 22:39
|
#35
|
Behe
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 540
|
Re: end of round rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razorback
the same reasons most alliances accept defectors or former cheaters or ppl who are generally critical egos.
They can often play well and generate score / roids / activity
|
But they rarely if ever win the round which is the goals of most alliances , no? So again my question, if an alliance wants to win, why would HC's take them in?
Quote:
(fang never had issues with that)
|
Many alliances never had problems with that, im not nor have i ever been Fang HC, so i dont know why you bring this up.
Quote:
Some alliances ever accept ppl back in who actively tried to ruin one round or tried to split an alliance (Irvine anyone?)
Afterall its a game.....
|
Once again why the digs at Irvine? tbh he is one of the most loyal people i know and I dont believe could be called a fence sitter, which was what my post was about, loyalty/selfishness and fence sitting....
__________________
Once in awhile you get shown the light,
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 22:39
|
#36
|
Sheep
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: IRC
Posts: 563
|
Re: end of round rankings
omg use the other thread
__________________
WP
Ğragons
eXilition
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 23:28
|
#37
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: end of round rankings
any actual need for this thread?
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 23:34
|
#38
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: end of round rankings
yea can someone close this thread for me plz it was ment to be asking a question but ended up with the same name as the alliance rankings thread :P
/me slaps barney around a bit with a large trout
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
24 Dec 2004, 00:24
|
#39
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: end of round rankings
in a shocker, Lok does something by 'popular demand'
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21.
| |