why?

[Nitros]

Why did DS nap Ultores? That pretty much killed this round, blockwise.

[t3k]

Hasn't everyone pretty much forced DS's hand by blocking against them?

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by Nitros

That pretty much killed this round, blockwise.

Blocks kill this game. It's the only thing CT seem to be competent at.

Ds have sat quite pretty alone this, afaik they have only been targetted twice all round??(feel free to correct me).

So really they had no need to nap Ult other than them fortelling the same outcome to them as happened to CT last roung?

[Clouds]

They napped Ultores to avoid getting roided. Good politics.

[Reincarnate]

Originally Posted by Clouds

Blocks kill this game. It's the only thing CT seem to be competent at.

Originally Posted by Clouds

They napped Ultores to avoid getting roided. Good politics.

Is this trolling or are you just that stupid?

[Nitros]

Originally Posted by Clouds

Blocks kill this game. It's the only thing CT seem to be competent at.

I assume you're digging at me for being CT and blocking? Just for your information, I'm not really playing this round nor do I ever have anything to do with CT politics

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by Nitros

Why did DS nap Ultores? That pretty much killed this round, blockwise.

We all know that ultores is gonna break the NAP when ever they are able to win.
This NAP means nothing but a temporaly avoidance of getting inc while they bot outgrow the alliances bellow.

[[DDK]gm]

the nap helps ults by removing any support ds had

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by Reincarnate

Is this trolling or are you just that stupid?

Do the maths.

[Stylez1877]

Originally Posted by t3k

Hasn't everyone pretty much forced DS's hand by blocking against them?

No?
DS has probably had the least incomings of anyone this round.

Originally Posted by Clouds

They napped Ultores to avoid getting roided. Good politics.

While also putting their only competition firmly in the lead. Good poli.....

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by [DDK]gm

the nap helps ults by removing any support ds had

Well that might be true, we all know CT have been aiding Ultores to the win r46, and HaveN r47, i wonder who will help em this round.
Though i think its a good move atm for dS. Though its boring for the rest.

[Forest]

I don't think CT have a leg to stand on, considering they pretty much let ult win every round by napping/allying/working with ult at tick 800 to hit fang/haven/anyone else outroiding them.

[baggy]

the next few nights will be interesting.

It seems to me that its either APP and ULT (which should be called AULT), APP and DS (which adequetely makes 'phone'APPS) or DS and ULT (which only makes an uninteresting DULT)..

oh and occasionally the others contribute by working with these three to prolong the eventual round winner becomming apparant.

also, from someone peering in, it does seem the blocks are changing alot this round (quicker than normal) anyhoo, wonder what people make of this lack of 'loyalty'?

[Knight]

Originally Posted by baggy

also, from someone peering in, it does seem the blocks are changing alot this round (quicker than normal) anyhoo, wonder what people make of this lack of 'loyalty'?

Just another normal round of PA...

[Blink]

Originally Posted by Forest

I don't think CT have a leg to stand on, considering they pretty much let ult win every round by napping/allying/working with ult at tick 800 to hit fang/haven/anyone else outroiding them.

I can actually agree with this

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by Forest

I don't think CT have a leg to stand on, considering they pretty much let ult win every round by napping/allying/working with ult at tick 800 to hit fang/haven/anyone else outroiding them.

It's not exactly difficult to out roid an ally that grounds every night.

[Stylez1877]

Originally Posted by Fizz

I can actually agree with this

So, a bunch of ex-CT join DS (including Fizz) because they don't like how we helped Ult win last round.

So what happens?

DS helps Ult win this round by napping them and hitting CT with Apprime, V, Haven, and Ultores. I'm going to laugh when they turn on DS. Maybe then you can exile your way out of DS because 'no one likes you'...

But it's okay, you have nothing to do with it, right?

[ArcChas]

(Edit: I notice that Kaiba has deleted the post to which this was a reply so I've added it here for context).

Originally Posted by Kaiba
CT defence against Ultores and co was so shocking im suprised half the attacking planets didnt closed for farming... or was that the new CT masterplan?

I dont think CT have a right to criticise anyone frankly. Wjhen your own house is in order and you can defend AND attack sucessfully then you can come and have a pop at other alliances.. until then hush up please

I wonder if you'll be quite so cocky once you've reaped what you've sown.

Thinking about it, I don't need to wonder. The only time you've had any alliance success was when Ultores (for reasons unfathomable to the rest of us) allowed you to join them for a round - so you're used to having no foundation for your criticism of a long established alliance with two round wins under its belt.

[Nitros]

Originally Posted by Kaiba

CT defence against Ultores and co was so shocking im suprised half the attacking planets didnt closed for farming... or was that the new CT masterplan?

I dont think CT have a right to criticise anyone frankly. Wjhen your own house is in order and you can defend AND attack sucessfully then you can come and have a pop at other alliances.. until then hush up please

This has absolutly nothing to do with this topic.

[Blink]

Originally Posted by Stylez1877

So, a bunch of ex-CT join DS (including Fizz) because they don't like how we helped Ult win last round.

So what happens?

DS helps Ult win this round by napping them and hitting CT with Apprime, V, Haven, and Ultores. I'm going to laugh when they turn on DS. Maybe then you can exile your way out of DS because 'no one likes you'...

But it's okay, you have nothing to do with it, right?

Lol Stylez, I left CT because they suck, both politics wise and alliance wide. Only thing you got going is the tools. Well done on being accurate.


Saddest thing is, Ults are the only alliance that hasn't broken their nap to give ds its beatdown. Its taken 5 alliances to beatdown ds, well done. You're all epic. Loving the sks as well.
I'd rather let ults win 6/6, which is what I think I'll ensure happens. My only concern is finishing my round, also you honestly wanna know my reason foreexiling? You guys are the worst gal mates one could possibly have.

[[DDK]gm]

don't bother trying to come back then if that's how you feel, though i don't see DS doing very well on politics itself.

[Stylez1877]

Originally Posted by Fizz

Lol Stylez, I left CT because they suck, both politics wise and alliance wide. Only thing you got going is the tools. Well done on being accurate.


Saddest thing is, Ults are the only alliance that hasn't broken their nap to give ds its beatdown. Its taken 5 alliances to beatdown ds, well done. You're all epic. Loving the sks as well.
I'd rather let ults win 6/6, which is what I think I'll ensure happens. My only concern is finishing my round, also you honestly wanna know my reason foreexiling? You guys are the worst gal mates one could possibly have.

Oh no? 5 alliances are attacking DS? I mean, the last 3 days, wasn't DS attacking CT (the least roidfat alliance in the top 5) with Haven, xvx, Ultores, and Apprime? What goes around comes around . Thanks for giving Ultores the win. I'm sure you wish you had a few allies about now.

And it's okay, I rather be a bad gal mate than straight up dishonest, as you've been the entire round--if not just entirely manipulative.

[Donar]

well Fizz glad you exiled me out, ended up in app gal most fun i had since ages haha

[Mzyxptlk]

Originally Posted by Fizz

Its taken 5 alliances to beatdown ds, well done. You're all epic. Loving the sks as well.

I think it's pretty clear to everyone that it would've taken a single pensioner in a wheelchair to beat down DS. But why ruin an opportunity to inflict record roid loss?

Hmm, well DS should not be allowed to finish #1 without any real incoming that would be a crime, it is down to DS to handle the incoming better than what they have. DS have received no more incoming than any other ally.

[RexDrax]

Originally Posted by Firebird

Hmm, well DS should not be allowed to finish #1 without any real incoming that would be a crime, it is down to DS to handle the incoming better than what they have. DS have received no more incoming than any other ally.

Win some, lose some. Yeah its too bad we lost 25% of our roids. In the past we did better but oh well. Only way to go is up now and of course land for some good XP. Fortunately we didnt have (m)any defense crashes, quite a few of the attackers crashed though so that's good.

[TheoDD]

Originally Posted by RexDrax

Win some, lose some. Yeah its too bad we lost 25% of our roids. In the past we did better but oh well. Only way to go is up now and of course land for some good XP. Fortunately we didnt have (m)any defense crashes, quite a few of the attackers crashed though so that's good.

glad you added that (m) before any... As i've seen atleast 3 def fail breps, with unnecessairly lost value.

[RexDrax]

Originally Posted by TheoDD

glad you added that (m) before any... As i've seen atleast 3 def fail breps, with unnecessairly lost value.

Oh? I know of only 1 pretty bad crash and 2 semi def crashes. Other than at those 3 planets we really didnt lose any value except for the value lost due to roids.

[LynchMob]

Same old girly sh&te diffrent day.