Philosexology

[Prover]

Philosexology is a study on the philosophy of human sexuality and its impact in the world. Not intended to be completely serious. Not intended to be completely funny. If you're familiar with the Judeo-Christian worldview, where the Holy Bible is essentially the Word of God, you'll relate to the neutrality in my writing.

I refrain from choosing decidedly, at least one over the other, on egalitarian and complementarian positions, and present the seemingly paradoxical biblical verses for both sides. The former issues arise from our self-concern as individuals while the latter issues arise from the inferential evidence in corporeal society.

We read in Galatians 3:28 that "there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." God sent his Son as a male, presumably to be biologically (and biblically)* correct. If we interpret the passage in reference to an androgynous Holy Spirit, in proper context, it makes sense that our faith is something apart from any sexism -

* In Genesis 2:22, "the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man." The woman was made as a "helper" fit for the man, not necessarily inferior in God's eyes. The point is to show the logical consistency for Jesus Christ to appear as a man in similar fashion to God's first human creation.

- This does not mean we are called to completely abandon our reality as male and female counterparts. (But this is what we're increasingly seeing of people today, the merging of two sexes into one gender, as a result of societies fed on a strictly environmental approach to sexual development). We both rely heavily on marriage to counterbalance our masculine and feminine traits (But with the heightened divorce rates and other factors, people have apparently evolved into a marriage of themselves).

However, it is most important that we are called to unite as one in our faith in God the Son, like we unite in flesh in hope of our one. This is the only way to retrieve the same purity of soul Adam and Eden had before their naked indulgence. Our biological genes are permanently corrupted as a result of the great sin of pride, banning every human descendent from Eden. What it comes down to is shame, and overcoming our being ashamed.

Here is a relevant scenario: Suppose humans are somehow above and beyond the material world, as it certainly feels like we might be in a sense. We live and feed off the earth, it's our survival amidst the happening** of earth's resistance. We are somehow in it together.

** Or the randomness. Yes, it's an allusion.

Somewhere along the way it's important to make a distinction between entities in order for these things to make sense--spiritual and physical, internal behavior and external appearance, self-consciousness and consciousness, yin and yang, so on--likewise as male and female is evidence of a distinction in biology.

Otherwise, there is no way around simplification in human affairs, just as it is nearly impossible to not stereotype a person. And yet we still feel obligated to communicate with others about things that personify us. There is a standard of decency in doing so, at least among those at terms with human ignorance and not so bent on the truth of selfhood. Everyone is flawed in some way, and we don't always hold that against them. When you begin to recognize that both your intentions and your actions make up who you are, you will take a first step towards progress in your life.

In a final statement of digestion, of my experiences hitherto in life, summing up my entire perspective of the world mankind lives in, Never-Never Land or not, take it or leave it...

At the roots of all current struggle in society at large is the rebellion of woman against man and man against God. This accounts for the global rise of feminization and secularization, both of which are respectively the most detrimental forces in contemporary times.

It makes complete sense of the un-whole world. As "change" is no more growth than cancerous tumors. Is it not self-explanatory?