|
|
7 Feb 2015, 09:54
|
#201
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
While I agree with you on the fact that more maturity is needed in these situations, you have to see all events in this thread for what they are tho, bad attempts at slanderous propaganda. From partially quoting a range of conversations, to the accusation of bullying, it's nothing but a bad attempt to make the other look bad.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
7 Feb 2015, 10:44
|
#202
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
I don't think we're talking about alliance x hitting y anymore
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
7 Feb 2015, 12:13
|
#203
|
Leader Of The Gang
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 455
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adapt
Forest fan club!
|
^^ i run it greg
__________________
Round 60 - Ultores - Rank 67th.
Round 75 - CT - Rank 19th - Galaxy Win.
Round 80 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 81 - Ultores - Rank 73rd.
Round 83 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 91 - Lucky7 - Rank 50th.
Round 92 - Lucky7 - Rank 39th.
|
|
|
7 Feb 2015, 19:17
|
#204
|
!!!AMERICA!!!
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 793
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I think the fact that you don't even see your REPETITIVE behaviour designed to insult and upset as bullying, and wish to blame it all on me, says a lot more about you as a person than it does about me
|
MY repetitive behavior? Grow a spine i've talked to you for all of 5 min this round. Own up to the fact that YOU are the one who came in throwing insults and allegations and then emo left a chan ...
|
|
|
8 Feb 2015, 02:59
|
#205
|
Leader Of The Gang
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 455
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManiacMagic
MY repetitive behavior? Grow a spine i've talked to you for all of 5 min this round. Own up to the fact that YOU are the one who came in throwing insults and allegations and then emo left a chan ...
|
logs!?
__________________
Round 60 - Ultores - Rank 67th.
Round 75 - CT - Rank 19th - Galaxy Win.
Round 80 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 81 - Ultores - Rank 73rd.
Round 83 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 91 - Lucky7 - Rank 50th.
Round 92 - Lucky7 - Rank 39th.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2015, 15:50
|
#206
|
General (Adjective Army)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg
you got no fans forest
|
That's certainly not true.
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 13:38
|
#207
|
Friends and Foes
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Estonia
Posts: 461
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
I don't think we're talking about alliance x hitting y anymore
|
Welcome to AD. People hardly stay on topic here.
__________________
ASCENDANCY
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 14:22
|
#208
|
Shadows and Dust
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Black Bastion
Posts: 329
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
P3ng and BF foreplay last night, discuss.
Personally it was nice for me not to get the inc.
__________________
Nick: Swing
R3 or so - Cell/Elysium
Looong break
R20 - Orbit
R21 - Subh (Finished rank 58)
8 year break
R60 - ND -> Ultores (Finished rank 48)
R61 - Rogues
14:05 <Swing> I wear a cape and a burger king paper crown when i play pa
14:10 <Zwanstic> u also talk alot of shit
14:14 <Blue_Esper> you're a weird unit
12:33 <hone> oddr is where we send all the semi retarded and gay bashing ult has beens LOL
12:34 <hone> thats where u should be swing lol
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 14:28
|
#209
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bane
P3ng and BF foreplay last night, discuss.
Personally it was nice for me not to get the inc.
|
Seems like the first real incs BF got this round is gonna break them totaly.
Its good that they can go up against each other to match their true powers.
p3ng 1 - 0 BF
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 16:06
|
#210
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Seems like the first real incs BF got this round is gonna break them totaly.
|
Broken because we lost some roids? Are you really that naive?
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 16:29
|
#211
|
Error
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 359
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
BB, almost all users from this forum know a little bit about PA, in other words, propaganda makes no sense this days.
u will not turn down bf moral saying this. just bcoz they are having a funny round as i can see, playing other game and just being present in PA history again, as a nice core they are.
so, after a xp round, this one looks like a very very classical PA round, with the same names in the same top galaxys playing the same old way, value plus some nice lands.
ultores have a lead, and for sure peng will try to take them down.
lets wait and see wich side works better.
=)
(and for the one who really diserves: congrats ND, nice lands today)
__________________
#braSilFTW
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 16:45
|
#212
|
Shadows and Dust
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Black Bastion
Posts: 329
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
ND did late runs and managed to land P3ng?
__________________
Nick: Swing
R3 or so - Cell/Elysium
Looong break
R20 - Orbit
R21 - Subh (Finished rank 58)
8 year break
R60 - ND -> Ultores (Finished rank 48)
R61 - Rogues
14:05 <Swing> I wear a cape and a burger king paper crown when i play pa
14:10 <Zwanstic> u also talk alot of shit
14:14 <Blue_Esper> you're a weird unit
12:33 <hone> oddr is where we send all the semi retarded and gay bashing ult has beens LOL
12:34 <hone> thats where u should be swing lol
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 18:29
|
#213
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph
ultores have a lead, and for sure peng will try to take them down.
lets wait and see wich side works better.
|
I cant see this happening now. Unless BF is much weaker than I think p3n and BF will be fighting for too long for whoever wins to have a shot at Ult.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph
(and for the one who really diserves: congrats ND, nice lands today)
|
An unfortunate consequence of stopping quite a few BF incs is that almost all ND waves got through
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 19:18
|
#214
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph
BB, almost all users from this forum know a little bit about PA, in other words, propaganda makes no sense this days.
u will not turn down bf moral saying this. just bcoz they are having a funny round as i can see, playing other game and just being present in PA history again, as a nice core they are.
so, after a xp round, this one looks like a very very classical PA round, with the same names in the same top galaxys playing the same old way, value plus some nice lands.
ultores have a lead, and for sure peng will try to take them down.
lets wait and see wich side works better.
=)
(and for the one who really diserves: congrats ND, nice lands today)
|
BF is never playing for #1, if they fail at getting 2nd or 3rd they arnt achieving anything but a few planet ranks.
BF is getinng breaked down by p3ng now
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 19:29
|
#215
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
We should quit because we lost a few roids on night 1.
|
|
|
9 Feb 2015, 22:55
|
#216
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
We should quit because we lost a few roids on night 1.
|
Maybe BF can turn the losses tonight? who knows
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 00:52
|
#217
|
KK
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 662
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Seems like the first real incs BF got this round is gonna break them totaly.
Its good that they can go up against each other to match their true powers.
p3ng 1 - 0 BF
|
Early days. P3ng vs BF and ND. Who saw that coming?
We shall treat them with the utmost respect.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 01:14
|
#218
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krypton
Early days. P3ng vs BF and ND. Who saw that coming?
We shall treat them with the utmost respect.
|
I had honestly not belived any of P3ng or BF would risk it
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 01:15
|
#219
|
Leader Of The Gang
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 455
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
BF is never playing for #1, if they fail at getting 2nd or 3rd they arnt achieving anything but a few planet ranks.
BF is getinng breaked down by p3ng now
|
you used the word "breaked" and spelt getting wrong..
like clouds is saying how does 1 night of loses mean they are being BROKEN down?
__________________
Round 60 - Ultores - Rank 67th.
Round 75 - CT - Rank 19th - Galaxy Win.
Round 80 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 81 - Ultores - Rank 73rd.
Round 83 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 91 - Lucky7 - Rank 50th.
Round 92 - Lucky7 - Rank 39th.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 07:35
|
#220
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
He also has a lot better English than a lot of English people. That is one of the crappiest posts I have seen on here. Stop flaming, Adapt.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 07:54
|
#221
|
Mordar, Keel, Reip
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 333
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Broken? Taken down by p3ng?
day 1 we had ~160 incs, maybe half of them in quite big p3ng waves on quite fat planets, yes, we lost a few roids, but a few incs won't break us, we crashed a few fleets but even that won't break us. and if p3ng definitely wants to drag this till the end of the round, we will keep dancing. On the dawn of Day 2, there's a lot more incs from Bows, Viks and ODDR than from p3ng (maybe a third of the total from p3ng). And yes, some of the ODDR and Viks bigger waves are landing again. Still not broken, hardly even bent and still jogging to warm up before it's time for kick off
* gives p3ng a small, respective nod *
__________________
Wolf in a pirates clothing to the highest degree, standing behind the curtains.
All the war propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting. - George Orwell
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 09:09
|
#222
|
Paso Leaute
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Im surprised at all this talk of breaking alliances.
Attackers dont break alliances. The only way an alliance can be beaten in this game is when that ally themselves decides they have lost and gives up. Otherwise they can keep up attacks almost indefinitely even while they are drained of roids. There is no way to effectively judge an alliance's morale from the outside either.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 13:29
|
#223
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Breaking their hopes to reach their goal?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 14:21
|
#224
|
-HotLipS-
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 55
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krypton
Early days. P3ng vs BF and ND. Who saw that coming?
We shall treat them with the utmost respect.
|
p3n vs BF/ND? Hypocrite much? What about p3n/Viks/BowS/ODDR/HR vs BF? :-p
So far day 2 BF is gaining roids, p3n on -5,3 %. BF likely ending on a minus ofc with 5 allies on them, but end of the day p3n still on -5,3 %. That % will be boosted a bit after the brilliant strategy of re-initing is conducted.
By all means tho, gj.
__________________
"Art of Farming"
R 6 - Olympus
R 7 - Skipped
R 8 - Adelante
R 9 - ViruS, 38:10:7
R 9.5 - RaH, 40:5:9
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 15:06
|
#225
|
Shadows and Dust
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Black Bastion
Posts: 329
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Warring the mining page for a win
__________________
Nick: Swing
R3 or so - Cell/Elysium
Looong break
R20 - Orbit
R21 - Subh (Finished rank 58)
8 year break
R60 - ND -> Ultores (Finished rank 48)
R61 - Rogues
14:05 <Swing> I wear a cape and a burger king paper crown when i play pa
14:10 <Zwanstic> u also talk alot of shit
14:14 <Blue_Esper> you're a weird unit
12:33 <hone> oddr is where we send all the semi retarded and gay bashing ult has beens LOL
12:34 <hone> thats where u should be swing lol
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 15:28
|
#226
|
KK
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 662
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulS
p3n vs BF/ND? Hypocrite much? What about p3n/Viks/BowS/ODDR/HR vs BF? :-p
So far day 2 BF is gaining roids, p3n on -5,3 %. BF likely ending on a minus ofc with 5 allies on them, but end of the day p3n still on -5,3 %. That % will be boosted a bit after the brilliant strategy of re-initing is conducted.
By all means tho, gj.
|
I have no reason to spar with you, so i shall take the high road and lol
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 15:52
|
#227
|
-HotLipS-
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 55
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krypton
I have no reason to spar with you, so i shall take the high road and lol
|
Ye, cuz there's no comeback argument for you being p3n given current situation. So you take your high road :-D
__________________
"Art of Farming"
R 6 - Olympus
R 7 - Skipped
R 8 - Adelante
R 9 - ViruS, 38:10:7
R 9.5 - RaH, 40:5:9
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:05
|
#228
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulS
Ye, cuz there's no comeback argument for you being p3n given current situation. So you take your high road :-D
|
To be honest there is, but Krypton obviously couldn't be bothered to go into details. At the moment p3ng obviously have ND and BF hitting them (as well as random fleets from smaller tags). Your probably correct, I am sure BF have some incoming from others at the moment, however, as a fair few of those alliances you brought up in your original post are barely 20 man tags (and at this stage of the round I am sure, as everyone is, not at full capacity with fleets flying) then your argument is a bit 'lol'
For others this was bound to happen.. obviously BF have chosen to allow Ult to win the round with napping them, so eventually it was going to turn into p3ng vs Ult/ND/BF
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:14
|
#229
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
To be honest there is, but Krypton obviously couldn't be bothered to go into details. At the moment p3ng obviously have ND and BF hitting them (as well as random fleets from smaller tags). Your probably correct, I am sure BF have some incoming from others at the moment, however, as a fair few of those alliances you brought up in your original post are barely 20 man tags (and at this stage of the round I am sure, as everyone is, not at full capacity with fleets flying) then your argument is a bit 'lol'
For others this was bound to happen.. obviously BF have chosen to allow Ult to win the round with napping them, so eventually it was going to turn into p3ng vs Ult/ND/BF
|
Who is CT fighting then? An invisible enemy?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:23
|
#230
|
-HotLipS-
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 55
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
To be honest there is, but Krypton obviously couldn't be bothered to go into details. At the moment p3ng obviously have ND and BF hitting them (as well as random fleets from smaller tags). Your probably correct, I am sure BF have some incoming from others at the moment, however, as a fair few of those alliances you brought up in your original post are barely 20 man tags (and at this stage of the round I am sure, as everyone is, not at full capacity with fleets flying) then your argument is a bit 'lol'
For others this was bound to happen.. obviously BF have chosen to allow Ult to win the round with napping them, so eventually it was going to turn into p3ng vs Ult/ND/BF
|
lol, those "barely 20 man tags" are slugging away 250+ fleets on BF. And ofc it's a coincidence none of them double-booked anything, ofc.
ND isn't p-targetting p3n, we just declared war in-game to get some extra juice on the fat targets. We aren't coordinating anything. If those other ppl in those p3n gals weren't hit by ND, it's cuz they were too hard targets for ND.
__________________
"Art of Farming"
R 6 - Olympus
R 7 - Skipped
R 8 - Adelante
R 9 - ViruS, 38:10:7
R 9.5 - RaH, 40:5:9
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:35
|
#231
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulS
lol, those "barely 20 man tags" are slugging away 250+ fleets on BF. And ofc it's a coincidence none of them double-booked anything, ofc.
ND isn't p-targetting p3n, we just declared war in-game to get some extra juice on the fat targets. We aren't coordinating anything. If those other ppl in those p3n gals weren't hit by ND, it's cuz they were too hard targets for ND.
|
Ok So doing a slight bit of math here. The tags you mentioned which are 'apparently' hitting BF excluding p3ng fleets at the moment shall we say, if those tags you brought up were hitting BF at full force that means every planet within those tags would have to send 2 attack fleets each, which would add up to 292 fleets. I highly doubt this is happening.. If this was apparently happening then BF wouldn't be sending hardly any attack fleets at all and would be essentially grounding. Unless they have some second tag im unaware of that's defending against these 'mass waves.' However, if BF really are managing to defend this (including p3ng fleets) and still managing to attack also then fair play to them (although from past experiences I think your maths is off..)
Also I am confused.. for someone that's not 'coordinating' which alliance are you in again? If its ND how do you know so much on the fleet activity in BF? Was it just a 'coincidence' that you and CT were having some mini war, only to then declare war on p3ng once BF wanted to hit them? Lets not talk rubbish here..
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
Last edited by Willzzz; 10 Feb 2015 at 17:47.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:39
|
#232
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Who is CT fighting then? An invisible enemy?
|
I would imagine CT would be hitting the alliance that's been bashing them ie Ult? Which at the moment had nothing to do with my post. Try to keep up.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:46
|
#233
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
Ok So doing a slight bit of math here. The tags you mentioned which are 'apparently' hitting BF excluding p3ng fleets at the moment shall we say, if those tags you brought up were hitting BF at full force that means every planet within those tags would have to send 2 attack fleets each, which would add up to 292 fleets. I highly doubt this is happening.. If this was apparently happening then BF wouldn't be sending hardly any attack fleets at all and would be essentially grounding. Unless they have some second tag im unaware of that's defending against these 'mass waves'
Also I am confused.. for someone that's not 'coordinating' which alliance are you in again? If its ND how do you know so much on the fleet activity in BF? Was it just a 'coincidence' that you and CT were having some mini war, only to then declare war on p3ng once BF wanted to hit them? Lets not talk rubbish here..
|
pretty sure the war between ND and CT ended at least 2 days prior to ND declaring war on p3n
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:51
|
#234
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
You seem to be very bitter Willz.
Last round p3ng was on the other side of the fence, having BF handing them the win, why would anyone expect it to be any diffrent this time around?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:58
|
#235
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
You seem to be very bitter Willz.
Last round p3ng was on the other side of the fence, having BF handing them the win, why would anyone expect it to be any diffrent this time around?
|
Handing us the win? lol p3ng the last 2 rounds earned the win. Must of obviously missed the wars which happened in those rounds. I am not bitter at all, im just pointing out the obvious.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 17:59
|
#236
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
Handing us the win? lol p3ng the last 2 rounds earned the win. Must of obviously missed the wars which happened in those rounds. I am not bitter at all, im just pointing out the obvious.
|
And Ultores aint earning the win this time around?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:03
|
#237
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
And Ultores aint earning the win this time around?
|
I never said that to be honest. But you can keep trying to troll my posts as much as you wish
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:07
|
#238
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
To be honest there is, but Krypton obviously couldn't be bothered to go into details. At the moment p3ng obviously have ND and BF hitting them (as well as random fleets from smaller tags). Your probably correct, I am sure BF have some incoming from others at the moment, however, as a fair few of those alliances you brought up in your original post are barely 20 man tags (and at this stage of the round I am sure, as everyone is, not at full capacity with fleets flying) then your argument is a bit 'lol'
|
I'm not going to go and cry on Alliance Discussion of how much incoming Black Flag is getting, but last night I counted just under 210 lines of incoming. We will just get on with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
For others this was bound to happen.. obviously BF have chosen to allow Ult to win the round with napping them, so eventually it was going to turn into p3ng vs Ult/ND/BF
|
p2nguins are trying to bully Black Flag into breaking ties with Ultores, and adopting this strategy will obviously only push us closer to them. "Blocking" us into hitting Ultores won't work. It's actually quite a poor move on your part.
Bitch3r and the Alliance Discussions troll squad can troll about how Black Flag has no guts to play for #1 all they want, but we will not be bullied or coerced, and we will certainly not backstab.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:10
|
#239
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
I'm not going to go and cry on Alliance Discussion of how much incoming Black Flag is getting, but last night I counted just under 210 lines of incoming. We will just get on with it.
p2nguins are trying to bully Black Flag into breaking ties with Ultores, and adopting this strategy will obviously only push us closer to them. "Blocking" us into hitting Ultores won't work. It's actually quite a poor move on your part.
|
I doubt it was a 'bully' tactic but more to do with 'Hit them before they hit us' tactic. Why wait for 3 alliances to come hit you? Might as well take the first step.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:14
|
#240
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
I never said that to be honest. But you can keep trying to troll my posts as much as you wish
|
Well BF might be allowing Ult to win, the same way they allowed you to win last round.
You were happy with this last round, why are you even bringing it up now?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:17
|
#241
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Bitch3r and the Alliance Discussions troll squad can troll about how Black Flag has no guts to play for #1 all they want, but we will not be bullied or coerced, and we will certainly not backstab.
|
I honestly dont care what you do this round realy.
You know this is the reason why p3ng is hitting you, and im quite suprise you are accepting the incs they give you so maturely.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:17
|
#242
|
KK
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 662
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
I'm not going to go and cry on Alliance Discussion of how much incoming Black Flag is getting, but last night I counted just under 210 lines of incoming. We will just get on with it.
p2nguins are trying to bully Black Flag into breaking ties with Ultores, and adopting this strategy will obviously only push us closer to them. "Blocking" us into hitting Ultores won't work. It's actually quite a poor move on your part.
Bitch3r and the Alliance Discussions troll squad can troll about how Black Flag has no guts to play for #1 all they want, but we will not be bullied or coerced, and we will certainly not backstab.
|
There's no point reasoning with false claims or even wasting any breath on what BF's Officers/Former officers say on the forums so...again...lol.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:18
|
#243
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Well BF might be allowing Ult to win, the same way they allowed you to win last round.
You were happy with this last round, why are you even bringing it up now?
|
lol I didn't bring up last round you did? Got to admit Butcher if you put more effort into HCing your alliance then coming on these boards Rainbows might be higher up the rankings.
If you wish to be precise about it BF and p3ng last round were allied when p3ng was around 4th in the alliance rankings and continued to work together for the rest of the round. How has this got the same relevance as them now napping an allie which is sat in 1st just days ago? If your going to try and 'troll' at least get your facts right.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:19
|
#244
|
Mordar, Keel, Reip
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 333
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Attractive female dogs, pls. Yes, you too SoulS. P3n put hardly any incs on us today, bows put prolly thrice their numbers with several pulls and relaunches etc. I believe CT landed more roids from BF than P3n all day, without the heavy support of other tags, P3n wouldn't have made a notch at all today. Easily over 200 incs today, and yes, many from the smaller tags were sending at least 2 attack fleets, some of them sent both attack fleets more than once. Keep it coming, I enjoy the challenge of DCing twice the number of hostiles than we even have fleets available, covering some galmates from random incs while at it
The tunes are playing loud and the songs heard wide, this is an open call to dance.
And you ride quite high horses on those high roads... just saying.
__________________
Wolf in a pirates clothing to the highest degree, standing behind the curtains.
All the war propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting. - George Orwell
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:20
|
#245
|
KK
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 662
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
And Ultores aint earning the win this time around?
|
We have conceded that they will win. We've already said we wont ceasefire with bf/nd to hit ult during discussions with those two allies - however they choose to spin it.
P3nguins respects Ultores as a great ally and sees them as worthy winners, so unless something changes that's how it will finish
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:22
|
#246
|
KK
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 662
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoXiouS
Attractive female dogs, pls. Yes, you too SoulS. P3n put hardly any incs on us today, bows put prolly thrice their numbers with several pulls and relaunches etc. I believe CT landed more roids from BF than P3n all day, without the heavy support of other tags, P3n wouldn't have made a notch at all today. Easily over 200 incs today, and yes, many from the smaller tags were sending at least 2 attack fleets, some of them sent both attack fleets more than once. Keep it coming, I enjoy the challenge of DCing twice the number of hostiles than we even have fleets available, covering some galmates from random incs while at it
The tunes are playing loud and the songs heard wide, this is an open call to dance.
And you ride quite high horses on those high roads... just saying.
|
lol
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:24
|
#247
|
Dictator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 634
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
There seems to be some misrepresentation of the truth here.. or at least some bending of the truth.
There was no block and no intention to hit bf until they went all emo over us hitting 4 planets in our gal raids which consisted of 4 random galaxies. One of which ct also hit (2:5) which is where I think 2 or 3 of the BF members were. As I said to you on whatsapp clouds there was nothing for us to de-escalate as there was nothing going on. I even showed you our raid but you still decided to get all keyboard agressive.
I then get more threats around hitting us back blah blah and I said suit yourself pretty much. I am then pasted logs from a gal chan where BF members are saying p3ng has declared war on BF.. LOL
I decided it was time to make some friends and prepare for the incoming. It was confirmed you were hitting us with ND and so we responded. You pressed the war button not us. The assumption we can make is that you had hoped you could use your ND support tag to shank us early knowing p3ng didnt have support from others.
Pretty much most my PM's consist of "why arent you hitting ult". Sadly if the uni wanted to see another war with p3ng and ult they should have tried to balance the odds. I'm not sending 60 members like lemmings into a battle with 180. We were blocked early, it became unprofitable for ult and p3ng to continue. It stopped. Now there seems to be the attitude of a "you owe it to everyone to hit ult".
However with all the above said. Unsure what BF are aiming for this round. It seems to be going pretty much the same as the last 3 with added support of ND. Clouds planet win?
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:26
|
#248
|
KK
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 662
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Also, should probably note that our TP was messed up last night, so that is probably the reasoning behind Black Flag coping so well today.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 18:30
|
#249
|
Dictator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 634
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
I missed noxs post.
LOL
ND send more fleets than BF
SHOCKED TO THE CORE
|
|
|
10 Feb 2015, 19:07
|
#250
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R60 mid round turmoil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willzzz
lol I didn't bring up last round you did? Got to admit Butcher if you put more effort into HCing your alliance then coming on these boards Rainbows might be higher up the rankings.
If you wish to be precise about it BF and p3ng last round were allied when p3ng was around 4th in the alliance rankings and continued to work together for the rest of the round. How has this got the same relevance as them now napping an allie which is sat in 1st just days ago? If your going to try and 'troll' at least get your facts right.
|
We started out this round with 20 or so members, and now we are almost full tag, we have come a long way since pt1 in that regard.
Im pretty sure that at this point last round BF/p3ng were both sitting in the top 3, both having more or less the same chance on paper to win the round.
I guess it hurts that if you want to win this round, you gotta fight a alliance sitting in a better position than you, with basicly no support. Im pretty sure Inferno/CT was going on about something like this last round, BF only played for planet rankings, Ult being allied to both BF/P3ng, wich basicly made it impossibole for them to achieve #1.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59.
| |