Planetarion Forums

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 14:55

What alliance was pathetic enough to attack my inactive, retired, unallied galaxy? I'll give you some hints:

They are at war and supposesly should be roiding the enemy
They were in my P (P FWEE)
Some of them used 3 fleets to attack, leaving none for alliance defence
They used a scan planet to scan us with
They sent a predictable fake
They had milti escorts
They launched at 03:57 (So crap they couldn't even launch at the right time)
They launched knowing we would be offline and unable to gather defence.
They probably wanted some revenge from last round

So in short, they were selfish, cheating cowards. So what alliance is most likely to contain that sort of member?

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 14:58

BTW, we expected this to happen, actually didn't think it would take as long as it did.

Yes we're fully aware it's a war game and all that. But showing them up is fun.

Supernova9 · 17 Mar 2003, 15:06

Shocker of shockers :eek:

Surprisingly enough I can identify with you on that one, identical thing happened in my gal, cept it was an 0655 launch.

Same multi escorts and scan planets.

All I can say?

WEE

(T)

djcomplex · 17 Mar 2003, 15:10

thats absolutely crazy scouse how DARE someone who is playing a war game attack someone else who is also playing that same war game!!
what has the "world" come too!

xtothez · 17 Mar 2003, 15:16

It's a human tragedy.

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 15:22

Quote:

Originally posted by djcomplex
thats absolutely crazy scouse how DARE someone who is playing a war game attack someone else who is also playing that same war game!!
what has the "world" come too!

I know! It's both a disgrace and a human tragedy, as xtothez pointed out. Nice to see we have supports! Thank you both, really.

SilverSmoke · 17 Mar 2003, 15:27

selfobsessive twat doesnt seem to understand that they probably came to get his roids

omg what has happend to AD.. I remember we where whining all over because of the lack of quality threads but see how much more lower we can go :/

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 15:29

Quote:

Originally posted by djcomplex
what has the "world" come too!

Apparantly its become filled with people who like crashing cars into walls to serve sarcasm.

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 15:30

Quote:

Originally posted by SilverSmoke
selfobsessive twat doesnt seem to understand that they probably came to his your roids

omg what has happend to AD.. I remember we where whining all over because of the lack of quality threads but see how much more lower we can go :/

Haha. Perhaps re-read what I said, with a tinge of sarcasm and a comedy twist, you silly silly man. You might come to realise I care about as much as you.

SilverSmoke · 17 Mar 2003, 15:33

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
Haha. Perhaps re-read what I said, with a tinge of sarcasm and a comedy twist, you silly silly man. You might come to realise I care about as much as you.

no matter what 'comedy twist' you tried to put in there, still you are one crap poster. A selfobsessed twat in a text based online game.

xtothez · 17 Mar 2003, 15:34

And yet your gal still lost roids.

Let me examine the facts of this.

You're in a 'retired' galaxy (which still happens to be active enough to go around grabbing ops on all parallel chans just before the shuffle, and completing tick-perfect start to the round for the whole gal)
threatens people with military force from the start:

Quote:

<+Cicada> if you attack us though, were still going to kick the **** out of yer though
<+Cicada>
31:3 is a gal which has roids
You're certainly in a good position to defend against the parallel alliance attacking their ex-titans peers
And you made no friends inside the attacking forces last round.

I have yet to see a single reason why you shouldnt be hit. Hell, I was going to take your gal as my target, but someone beat me to it. There was no reason to think you were neutral at all, and every reason to take advantage of the roids on offer.

If you are really 'retired', leave the game to the players and quit bitching when someone you dont like lands pods on you. If you're just playing to sit and start **** on boards like this, you really do have some 'issues' to sort out.

Supernova9 · 17 Mar 2003, 15:36

Quote:

Originally posted by SilverSmoke
no matter what 'comedy twist' you tried to put in there, still you are one crap poster. A selfobsessed twat in a text based online game.

Do you not remember the "DULL TWAT" wars and other pointless rubbish you subjected everyone on these boards to when you had your petty little fights with Cryptic every bloody hour circa round 4. And talking about selfobsessed, I don't see Scouse randomly circulating his picture every so often in an attempt to get his ego masturbated.

"Look at me, Look at me, I'm that one there, yes, the one that looks like a columbian drug lord!"

Supernova9 · 17 Mar 2003, 15:38

Quote:

Originally posted by xtothez
threatens people with military force from the start:

31:3 is a gal which has roids

That Cicada joke was taken horrendously out of context if I do remember correctly.

oh, and isn't the use of co-ords (no matter how well known) a strike-able offence?

xtothez · 17 Mar 2003, 15:41

Quote:

Originally posted by Supernova9
That Cicada joke was taken horrendously out of context if I do remember correctly.

oh, and isn't the use of co-ords (no matter how well known) a strike-able offence?

It's always a joke when it suits you.

Strike me down, I'm really concerned about posting co-ords mentioned in the sigs of the gal members.

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 15:41

Quote:

Originally posted by xtothez
You're in a 'retired' galaxy (which still happens to be active enough to go around grabbing ops on all parallel chans just before the shuffle, and completing tick-perfect start to the round for the whole gal)

Erm, what? I only ever had ops in my p channel and that was after the shuffle, and only me since I was the gal rep, and someone decided they all got ops.

Quote:

threatens people with military force from the start:

If you believe that you'll believe anything.

Quote:

31:3 is a gal which has roids

You do realise how utterly easily this game is?

Quote:

You're certainly in a good position to defend against the parallel alliance attacking their ex-titans peers

Hows that? We have no alliances.

Quote:

And you made no friends inside the attacking forces last round.

Did you miss the bit where I said we expected it.

Quote:

If you are really 'retired', leave the game to the players and quit bitching when someone you dont like lands pods on you.

Follow the advice I gave to SilverSmoke.

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 15:43

Quote:

Originally posted by SilverSmoke
selfobsessive twat doesnt seem to understand that they probably came to get his roids

I see someone snuck out of line when god was handing out the ability to recognize titanic-like irony before hitting the post button.

Though, I'm still putting my money on Jurgen trying to overcompensate for something or work on his inferioty complex rather then just for roids

JonnyBGood · 17 Mar 2003, 15:46

You shouldn't complain scouse. I got hit last round and I seem to recall logging on every 4 or 5 days. Some people are so awful at this game that they see every potential gain, no matter how slight, as a cause for breaking out the champagne. I'd say there was a lot of loling and rofling when that attack was launched. Ah well, what I do know? I was never any good anyways.

hAl · 17 Mar 2003, 15:50

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
What alliance was pathetic enough to attack my inactive, retired, unallied galaxy? I'll give you some hints:

They are at war and supposesly should be roiding the enemy

They were in my P (P FWEE)

Some of them used 3 fleets to attack, leaving none for alliance defence

They used a scan planet to scan us with

They sent a predictable fake

They had milti escorts

They launched at 03:57 (So crap they couldn't even launch at the right time)

They launched knowing we would be offline and unable to gather defence.

They probably wanted some revenge from last round

So in short, they were selfish, cheating cowards. So what alliance is most likely to contain that sort of member?

Since you gal is protected by VVOMM arbiter the chances of it being WEET/NAR were bound to be huge. and sure, a little revenge feelings is bound to happen. But actually you just looked liked a juicy gal as well.

From past experience I know that this way of attacking is a practise that is common amongst both sides. So your complaints seem very strange to me cause I remember well enough that your 'former' round alliance blocks used the same particular tactics and you never complained then. Only thing mayby is that they used to do a little better by only using two fleets part mostly.

hAl

btw, what is wrong with attacking at 03:57 ?

xtothez · 17 Mar 2003, 15:52

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
If you believe that you'll believe anything.[/b]

You're starting to convince me on that one. I'm beginning to wonder how such a trolling, provocative **** can have many friends left to arrange defense/retals with.

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
You do realise how utterly easily this game is?

Its even easier with 31:3 playing !

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
Hows that? We have no alliances.

But sitting on the Olympians server with o-lines gives you no avenue whatsoever to get help?

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
Did you miss the bit where I said we expected it.

Which is why I have no doubt this post was written at tick 72, and you've just been chomping at the bit to post it.

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
Follow the advice I gave to SilverSmoke.

You dont care?

'Cool'

Now there's no need for you to come here and wank your ego by being able to criticize the incoming on you and claim how much better you would have done it in your day. After all, you dont care what we think, right? We bother preaching it?

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 15:52

Quote:

Originally posted by hAl
btw, what is wrong with attacking at 03:57 ?

It's between 2 and 5 minutes too early. Depending on tick.

And you're right, my gal was a decent target, and like I said we expected it earlier than last night.

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 15:55

Quote:

Originally posted by hAl
From past experience I know that this way of attacking is a practise that is common amongst both sides. So your complaints seem very strange to me cause I remember well enough that your 'former' round alliance blocks used the same particular tactics and you never complained then. Only thing mayby is that they used to do a little better by only using two fleets part mostly.

Well at least you're closer then the rest, the hint is in 'complaint'.
And in our 'former' block, people got kicked for not attacking with the war effort.

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 16:00

Quote:

Originally posted by xtothez
STUFF WHERE I SHOW YOU WITHOUT LOOKING BITTER OR ANYTHING

Xtothez in I am acting as if I was analy raped last night *SHOCKAH*

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 16:04

xtothez, why don't you answer me on IRC? Are you a 'write, think, write, think, think, write, think, write, think, think, think, submit' type of person, incapable of a fast flowing coversation?

xtothez · 17 Mar 2003, 16:05

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
xtothez, why don't you answer me on IRC? Are you a 'write, think, write, think, think, write, think, write, think, think, think, submit' type of person, incapable of a fast flowing coversation?

My bouncer is ****ed, so I'm not connected to it.

Gimme a minute and I'll join the old-fashioned way :/

Zitos · 17 Mar 2003, 16:06

They are at war and supposesly should be roiding the enemy?

So when your in block-a, you cant attack any one outside of block-b?
-----

They were in my P (P FWEE)

Low eta is a good thing, deal with it..
-----

Some of them used 3 fleets to attack, leaving none for alliance defence..

Theire alliance might not need the slots, since people like you dont attack them..
-----

They used a scan planet to scan us with

Ok.. Is that against the rules? And I would like to see your side not using scanplanets..
-----

They had milti escorts..

Read at the bottom..
-----

They launched at 03:57 (So crap they couldn't even launch at the right time..)

So wich time is right then? Funny that such a crapp attack, could make you so pissed off..
-----

They launched knowing we would be offline and unable to gather defence..

Personaly I would say thats a smart move.. I wonder why we have launched at 2:55/3:55/4:55/5:55 during the last rounds.. Is it because you want to catch the enemy when they sleep?
-----
Now Scouse.. I agree with you, multi escortes aint good.. So I urge you to report i, so the 'cheaters' like thees disaperes from the game..

Come on Scouse.. Before making a post like this, atleast try to find some good arguments.. All you are doign here, is to credit the attacker.. And since you wonder what block attacking you, i could pherhaps say Weet?

And when i refere to your side, it's Vomm.. Even though "you dont have any alliance.."

:-D
- the zitoz

Cicada · 17 Mar 2003, 16:09

Quote:

Originally posted by hAl
Since you gal is protected by VVOMM arbiter the chances of it being WEET/NAR were bound to be huge.

we are???

btw we know exactly who it was

and xeothez..notice saracasm in future please..

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 16:16

Urgh, nasty to quote lists.

Quote:

Originally posted by Zitos
So when your in block-a, you cant attack any one outside of block-b?

Not so much as can't, as shouldn't. You can attack whoever you like, even allies, but personally I'd hate people attacking neutrals when my alliance is at war with another, just out of greed.

Quote:

Theire alliance might not need the slots, since people like you dont attack them..

Maybe not, but it's against 90% of alliances' rules to attack with 3 fleets.

Quote:

Ok.. Is that against the rules? And I would like to see your side not using scanplanets..

My 'side' consists of myself and the 9 others in my gal and none of us have scan planets.

Quote:

So wich time is right then? Funny that such a crapp attack, could make you so pissed off..

03.59 at least. And I'm not 'pissed off' at all. I saw the oppurtunity for some 'laughs' on AD and now you're all jumping thru loops.

Quote:

And since you wonder what block attacking you, i could pherhaps say Weet?

I already know what block it is. The block is WEET, actually it's a gal with 4 Dragons in, and other assorted WEET types.

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 16:17

They are at war and supposesly should be roiding the enemy <-- So when your in block-a, you cant attack any one outside of block-b? <--- yes you should be busy with the war, basically attacking a neutral gal will cost you 3x the fleet you are sending at that gal for the war, once in your attack on them, once in their fleet staying home to def, and once in their fleet defending against you.
They were in my P (P FWEE) <-- Low eta is a good thing, deal with it..<-- No you misunderstand, they were in our P alliance
Some of them used 3 fleets to attack, leaving none for alliance defence <-- Theire alliance might not need the slots, since people like you dont attack them..<-- They are unable to determine wether or not their alliance needs slots at the time they launched
They used a scan planet to scan us with <-- Ok.. Is that against the rules? And I would like to see your side not using scanplanets..<-- It's just another continuation of the lameness presented
They had milti escorts <-- Read at the bottom..Did that already ofc duh
They launched at 03:57 (So crap they couldn't even launch at the right time) <-- So wich time is right then? Funny that such a crapp attack, could make you so pissed off..<-- Point missed, display of n00bness, in the point and by you
They launched knowing we would be offline and unable to gather defence. <-- Personaly I would say thats a smart move.. I wonder why we have launched at 2:55/3:55/4:55/5:55 during the last rounds.. Is it because you want to catch the enemy when they sleep?<--- Missed point again, the entire 'idea' is to attack your enemy of which you deem to be able to defend itself at its weakest, not attack retired people without alliance at their weakest

Sorry for answering this seriously, but I wanted to make a messy post like this

Zitos · 17 Mar 2003, 16:26

Parra:
Sorry that i miss alot of your points.. But if you dont like to get attacked, then just dont play a game where attacking is the main part of it.. Even if you are retired, you may still be attacked..

And all those points.. Ok, you got your points of view.. And I got mine.. they are difrent, so I wont agrue more about that.. I can see your frustration.. you wanting to play a good round without any alliance.. Sort of like Singu round seven.. But dont get to fed up, when that dont happend..

Scourse:
Ok ok ok ok.. So what you dont like, is that they brake the rules of theire alliances, dont care about theire alliance and the fact that they are greedy.. Damn, you are almost like Christ him self.. But if its realy a problem for theire alliance, I think they would be in perfect condition to tell theire members not to do such.. I might have a bad sence of humor, but I dont find it funny that they launched two minutes too early..

And if that is siences of newbnes, then I would be the first one to admit, being a newbie..

You might say I got my head stuck too long up in the ass'es of the Weet's to see that this is lameness at its best.. But I think my thoughts would be preety much like those I got now, even If I where a part of Vomm, or your little ten mans block.. Sorry.. I just did'nt find this lame.. (-;

:-S
- the zitoz

"sorry for the bad english.."

Little Timmy · 17 Mar 2003, 16:31

This whole thread is very amusing and helps to pass the time till the end of the day.

Can you please try not to get bored with it and keep it going until at least 17:00 (that GMT) at which time I will be going home from work and will then have other things to do

hAl · 17 Mar 2003, 16:33

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
It's between 2 and 5 minutes too early. Depending on tick.

And you're right, my gal was a decent target, and like I said we expected it earlier than last night.

I found that many launch in the past was ****ed up by people wanting to launch to close to tick. Often the servers cannot handle the stress of all wanting to load the mill screen close to ticks. Trying to launch between :59 and :01 has caused ****loads of failed attacks. :57 is reasonably save. and only allows a very very few (who must be on line) to arrange adequate def to be send a tick earlier than normal. I have been doing a lot of scanning the last two rounds and finding newsscans where def is launched in the 5 mins after a :55 attacks is extremly rare. Missed launches though are far more common.

hAl

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 16:35

Yeah, Zitos, most of what you addressed to me is correct. You've maybe just misinterperated the initial post as a bitch, when it was more of a laugh.

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 16:37

Quote:

Originally posted by Little Timmy
This whole thread is very amusing and helps to pass the time till the end of the day.

Can you please try not to get bored with it and keep it going until at least 17:00 (that GMT) at which time I will be going home from work and will then have other things to do

Aha. Someone who gets the entire point of the thread.

This thread was super troll bait.

Zitos · 17 Mar 2003, 16:40

So this thread was allabout killing some free time? I had seriusly expected more from you guys..

:-(
- the zitoz

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 16:42

Quote:

Originally posted by Zitos
So this thread was allabout killing some free time? I had seriusly expected more from you guys..

Check your PM's please.

Tracelesh · 17 Mar 2003, 16:46

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
What alliance was pathetic enough to attack my inactive, retired, unallied galaxy?

I THINK I KNOW THE ANSWERE, CAN I SAY IT?

Teh_Necro · 17 Mar 2003, 16:57

WHAT?
Olympians roided teh scouse? ;/

Little Timmy · 17 Mar 2003, 17:00

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
Aha. Someone who gets the entire point of the thread.

Yeah Im real quick like that..........well the wife says Im quick

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 17:25

Quote:

Originally posted by Teh_Necro
WHAT?
Olympians roided teh scouse? ;/

Funny how in your own little way you manage to make fun of yourself by intentionally posting bad intel as a humerous attempt as opposed to the usual meant bad intel.

LaNiCoR · 17 Mar 2003, 17:54

what the idiots in the p alliance who attacked us fail to understand is that i/we don't care, i/we really don't, I intend to spend most of this round in bed asleep, occasionally creating a banner or 2 to pass the time (and take the piss).

Whereas the people who attacked us obviously care about score / roids / fleet etc and all the other things that matter in planetarion. They are here to play, we are here to annoy and make trouble, I just wanted to make that clear.

Teh_Necro · 17 Mar 2003, 18:32

Quote:

Originally posted by ParraCida
Funny how in your own little way you manage to make fun of yourself by intentionally posting bad intel as a humerous attempt as opposed to the usual meant bad intel.

You've lost me...

-Necro

Teh_Necro · 17 Mar 2003, 18:36

Quote:

Originally posted by LaNiCoR
what the idiots in the p alliance who attacked us fail to understand is that i/we don't care, i/we really don't, I intend to spend most of this round in bed asleep, occasionally creating a banner or 2 to pass the time (and take the piss).

Are you trying too confuse "those idiots in p alliance"?

I mean, one minute your saying you don't care, then the next, when they do finally hit you, you make an entire post insulting them and trying too make them look bad, why? Surley not because they attacked you... as well that would insinuate that you do care.

Hey maybe its the drugs.

-Necro

17 Mar 2003, 18:39

Quote:

Originally posted by LaNiCoR
occasionally creating a banner or 2 to pass the time (and take the piss).

Here's a funny banner for you

http://www.liquidhost.co.uk/pa/graph2.gif

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 19:54

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr Him
Here's a funny banner for you http://www.liquidhost.co.uk/pa/graph2.gif

And heres one for you.

Try to be funny like that again and I'll send him after you, now hush.

And necro, yeah I know, its okay though.

17 Mar 2003, 19:57

Quote:

Originally posted by ParraCida
And heres one for you.
Try to be funny like that again and I'll send him after you, now hush.

And necro, yeah I know, its okay though.

Thats not funny.... but i recommend he see a doctor.

ParraCida · 17 Mar 2003, 20:02

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr Him
Thats not funny.... but i recommend he see a doctor.

I'll have him write out a perscription for that razor wit of yours while I'm at it.

17 Mar 2003, 20:09

Quote:

Originally posted by ParraCida
I'll have him write out a perscription for that razor wit of yours while I'm at it.

got meh own blend of herbs for that one

K-W · 17 Mar 2003, 20:18

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
What alliance was pathetic enough to attack my inactive, retired, unallied galaxy? I'll give you some hints:

They are at war and supposesly should be roiding the enemy

They were in my P (P FWEE)

Some of them used 3 fleets to attack, leaving none for alliance defence

They used a scan planet to scan us with

They sent a predictable fake

They had milti escorts

They launched at 03:57 (So crap they couldn't even launch at the right time)

They launched knowing we would be offline and unable to gather defence.

They probably wanted some revenge from last round

So in short, they were selfish, cheating cowards. So what alliance is most likely to contain that sort of member?

Wow scouse, youve truely exposed a terrible thing in PA. A galaxy roiding in parallel during the first week.

I think its fairly amusing that you think youve "shown them up"

how exactly did you do that?

The only actual thing youve shown is that some attacked with 3 fleets. And to even prove this was wrong youd have to prove that those planets were in alliances that didnt allow that.

The rest of your statements are mostly silly digs at thier tactics and the assumption that all escorts are multis. I wont argue that they arent probably multis, but ive seen lots of legit escorts in PA, to prove they are multis would take some more evidence than one escorted attack.

Scouse · 17 Mar 2003, 20:24

Quote:

Originally posted by ParraCida
And heres one for you.
Try to be funny like that again and I'll send him after you, now hush.

Do you have nothing better to do?

xtothez · 17 Mar 2003, 20:25

Quote:

Originally posted by K-W

But you cant reply seriously to Scouse's post! You know he was only joking right?!?!?! Otherwise when you find out you'll be all embarassed and feel humiliated that the Titans Trolling, er Propaganda Squad outwitted you on AD!!!11212312rofltomato.