|
|
26 Mar 2010, 14:21
|
#101
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: are people serious?
I'm hereby volunteering to lead the inevitable block against whoever people want to hit. I don't know if this is ND for being #1, apprime for being #1 on average size and score or ascendancy for being ascendancy but whoever it is I'm here for you guys!
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
26 Mar 2010, 22:19
|
#102
|
Finn.. who's drunk.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 285
|
Re: are people serious?
oh well, I would look with suspicion at top100 first and wonder who actually has 20ish people or maybe more there and tries to play the under dog while waiting for those players to grow in value so they can actually win.
no-one cares about the 300 roiders.. they'r getting left behind slowly but surely atm they just give numbers/value for "propaganda" usage. Get real stats and then start using yer eyes would be my opinion. Give it a week and it should be clear who's downplaying and what.
unless you guys are just having a unfruitful debate here without looking at yer tools to see the real statistics instead of that useless alliance rank page what it really is at start aka completely and utterly useless for anything other than propaganda.
__________________
r2 Thieves
r3: top100(p0rks0da rox) r4: top400(excadrix, pcmaster+me=gal 99th) r5: top150(before giving up, nocex didn't rock) r6:evu and drunk dwarf (top50)
r7: wasted c27 gal, sucky luck in clus. r8: In real Finnish infantry.. 270days r9: boring round as hell
r9.5: Top60(small playerbase=easy)
Few won R's in PIA, r26 top15 First/Last Pax round.
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
10 lines max for signature I heard.. so
|
|
|
27 Mar 2010, 01:24
|
#103
|
Ubi concordia, ibi victor
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 152
|
Re: are people serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
I'm hereby volunteering to lead the inevitable block against whoever people want to hit. I don't know if this is ND for being #1, apprime for being #1 on average size and score or ascendancy for being ascendancy but whoever it is I'm here for you guys!
|
Before you start up with that project, why don't you at least make an attempt at one of your previous goals...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
I would hereby like to announce that Ascendancy will be taking matters into our own hands (as one should) and will level every fence gal we find that we have time to level.
Fear the reaper mother****ers.
|
I'd be more than willing to join your crusade against the wretched fence sitters, or have you found that you don't have time?
__________________
"I'm not saying I don't trust you, and I'm not saying I do. But I don't."
* We do not exist *
|
|
|
27 Mar 2010, 12:13
|
#104
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: are people serious?
I'm going to assume the reason you're both so angry has something to do with the day and time you posted at
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
27 Mar 2010, 20:21
|
#105
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 296
|
Re: are people serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordNieminen
oh well, I would look with suspicion at top100 first and wonder who actually has 20ish people or maybe more there and tries to play the under dog while waiting for those players to grow in value so they can actually win.
|
Did you look at your tools? Mine tell me the top 6 alliances have more or less the same amount of t100 players. Go pick one
|
|
|
27 Mar 2010, 21:59
|
#106
|
Finn.. who's drunk.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 285
|
Re: are people serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rUl3r
Did you look at your tools? Mine tell me the top 6 alliances have more or less the same amount of t100 players. Go pick one
|
Doesn't that kinda make my point of wait and see how it goes if it is even in your books, instead of talking about anyone being better than others and needing a bandwagon hit... and it ofc depends on yer defination of more/less.
__________________
r2 Thieves
r3: top100(p0rks0da rox) r4: top400(excadrix, pcmaster+me=gal 99th) r5: top150(before giving up, nocex didn't rock) r6:evu and drunk dwarf (top50)
r7: wasted c27 gal, sucky luck in clus. r8: In real Finnish infantry.. 270days r9: boring round as hell
r9.5: Top60(small playerbase=easy)
Few won R's in PIA, r26 top15 First/Last Pax round.
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
10 lines max for signature I heard.. so
|
|
|
27 Mar 2010, 22:44
|
#107
|
break it down!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: are people serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordNieminen
Doesn't that kinda make my point of wait and see how it goes if it is even in your books, instead of talking about anyone being better than others and needing a bandwagon hit... and it ofc depends on yer defination of more/less.
|
I don't think the post at the top of this page about starting a block was meant seriously...
__________________
I put the sex in dyslexia!
|
|
|
28 Mar 2010, 02:57
|
#108
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 296
|
Re: are people serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordNieminen
Doesn't that kinda make my point of wait and see how it goes if it is even in your books, instead of talking about anyone being better than others and needing a bandwagon hit... and it ofc depends on yer defination of more/less.
|
I thought you were referring to a specific alliance having a number of t100 planets "above average". If your point was "wait and see", I agree with you.
Also, by more or less I mean a margin of about 20%.
|
|
|
28 Mar 2010, 11:36
|
#109
|
Finn.. who's drunk.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 285
|
Re: are people serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Kila_
I don't think the post at the top of this page about starting a block was meant seriously...
|
nah jbg wasn't serious, that's why I didn't quote him. Was meant for those who might think they can play pa politics like a piano or something to give their ally's planets time to grow while everyone bash x alliance for reasons what aren't realistic to begin with as not enough time has passed yet in the round. That's why the point to check top100 planets so people don't play into a non-subttle plot what someone might be trying... I'm paranoidic, but tbh has been done so many times in pa rounds with success that it's unbelievable.
Offtopic:
Regarding time wise.. have admit loved the start up bonus... Some dudes used the credit aswell early to get bs's flying at tick 24.. I was too lazy for that, but have to admit that's one of the good improvements in pa since last time I tryed it out to give some options at the start to make a difference instead of just who's on every 2h's to init roids.
Same goes to goverment choices, the bonuses actually mean something this time.
__________________
r2 Thieves
r3: top100(p0rks0da rox) r4: top400(excadrix, pcmaster+me=gal 99th) r5: top150(before giving up, nocex didn't rock) r6:evu and drunk dwarf (top50)
r7: wasted c27 gal, sucky luck in clus. r8: In real Finnish infantry.. 270days r9: boring round as hell
r9.5: Top60(small playerbase=easy)
Few won R's in PIA, r26 top15 First/Last Pax round.
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
10 lines max for signature I heard.. so
|
|
|
28 Mar 2010, 14:18
|
#110
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 296
|
Re: are people serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordNieminen
nah jbg wasn't serious, that's why I didn't quote him. Was meant for those who might think they can play pa politics like a piano or something to give their ally's planets time to grow while everyone bash x alliance for reasons what aren't realistic to begin with as not enough time has passed yet in the round. That's why the point to check top100 planets so people don't play into a non-subttle plot what someone might be trying... I'm paranoidic, but tbh has been done so many times in pa rounds with success that it's unbelievable.
|
Probably because too many people try to fence their way through a round and happily jump on to any bandwagon of bashing someone as long as it´s not themselves.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30.
| |