|
9 Apr 2008, 00:34
|
#1
|
USS Oklahoma
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,500
|
Tibet and the Olympics
There are many in San Francisco who are planning to protest when the Olympic flame comes to town in the near future. They are protesting because the Olympics because of Chinese repression in Tibet.
Many are calling for a boycott of the China hosted Olympics because of what has gone on in Tibet.
Does it make any sense to any of you that a protest of a sporting event would in some way effect China's policy re Tibet?
__________________
Ignorance is curable, stupidity is not.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2008, 08:11
|
#2
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Not China's policy regarding Tibet. Maybe the United States' policy regarding China. Or at least I bet that's the protestors' motivation. I'm unsure about to what extent the US economy is reliant on China, and thus if offending it would be something your government should or would do. The same applies to a great many other countries, which is why it's unlikely anything will change.
[edit]Spelling.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
Last edited by Mzyxptlk; 9 Apr 2008 at 10:32.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2008, 10:23
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 247
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
|
|
|
9 Apr 2008, 10:50
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,347
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by dda
There are many in San Francisco who are planning to protest when the Olympic flame comes to town in the near future. They are protesting because the Olympics because of Chinese repression in Tibet.
Many are calling for a boycott of the China hosted Olympics because of what has gone on in Tibet.
Does it make any sense to any of you that a protest of a sporting event would in some way effect China's policy re Tibet?
|
Personally I would protest because the Olymic Games is shit and takes up TV for 23 hours a day. However, I do not have a TV atm so this doesn't bother me at all.
I think there are a number of things which the protestors might be trying to do.
1) Increase international awareness of the situation in Tibet in order to increase press coverage and therefore pressurise China to use less overt methods of repression.
2) Increase international pressure on China to stop ****ing with Tibet, using methods described above.
3) Piss off China.
Now, if any of these aims are even slightly realised then the protests would have been a success (sort of). There is no chance in hell that these protests are going to stop what is happening in Tibet, but may at least bring a slackening of things for a short while.
One problem is that it doesn't seem to be something the international community wants to bother with. There is no stategic reasons for using up a load of political capital on this area and no benefit to pissing off China.
Also, whilst it's a nice image to imagine a free Tibet, it's not really a vote winner. Once the games are over, Tibet will go back into obscurity. However, the other highlighted problem zones (Palestine, Iraq, Darfur etc) will still be in the news. I don't wish to suggest that these are vote winners, but I would argue that they are more deeply ingrained in the mind of the average person in the UK at the moment,* as well as having political relevence for their own sake.
*I don't know about the US, but I'd imagine it's pretty much the same
__________________
The 20th century has been characterised by three developments of great political importance. The growth of democracy; the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2008, 10:50
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,347
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Are Gay
|
Drop The Debt!
__________________
The 20th century has been characterised by three developments of great political importance. The growth of democracy; the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2008, 13:10
|
#6
|
I ♡ ☠
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 834
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
As ASG said, it's not about boycotting the games but raising Tibet's profile and attempting to mitigate China's suppression, and threats are quite useful for that.
I'm not sure if it'll work though because the Chinese government may be able to rile their population into ardent nationalism, using their arguments about China's special place in history, their unique culture, Western ignorance and now their claims that the Tibetans are ungrateful. Besides, democracy never graced China, so it's unlikely the theory of self-determination ever took hold there, and its certainly not likely to take hold in the Communist party.
I'm unsure if China will be able to ignore foreign opinion and carry on regardless or not. If China's economic and perhaps military power permits then probably, in the same way the US can ignore global opinion at the moment.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2008, 22:44
|
#7
|
USS Oklahoma
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,500
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Hillary Clinton has urged a boycott of the Olympics by the United States.
__________________
Ignorance is curable, stupidity is not.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2008, 23:37
|
#8
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by dda
Does it make any sense to any of you that a protest of a sporting event would in some way effect China's policy re Tibet?
|
Well it's a symbolic gesture against a symbolic event. This ensures that virtually no one will actually be inconvenienced.
Quote:
Hillary Clinton has urged a boycott of the Olympics by the United States.
|
I believe she has only called for a boycott of the opening ceremonies (specifically, she's asked President Bush not to attend the opening ceremonies).
Symbolic_Gestures++
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
10 Apr 2008, 04:57
|
#9
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by dda
Hillary Clinton has urged a boycott of the Olympics by the United States.
|
The BBC reported that she called on president Bush to boycott the opening ceremony iirc.
Bush said no.
And good on him too. He's on the way out, why not have a good time whilst he still can? He's probably more popular in China than in the US anyway.
Besides, Clinton is probably just lying anyway .
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
10 Apr 2008, 10:39
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,347
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimate Newbie
The BBC reported that she called on president Bush to boycott the opening ceremony iirc.
Bush said no.
And good on him too. He's on the way out, why not have a good time whilst he still can? He's probably more popular in China than in the US anyway.
Besides, Clinton is probably just lying anyway .
|
Aww bless, he is trying.
__________________
The 20th century has been characterised by three developments of great political importance. The growth of democracy; the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2008, 22:11
|
#11
|
Prince of Amber
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 1,313
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Are Gay
|
$201 Billion is not inconsequential, but only about six or seven percent of what congress plans to take in taxes next year.
__________________
"We sleep safe at night in our beds because rough men stand ready to visit violence upon those who wish to do us harm." -- George Orwell.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2008, 22:23
|
#12
|
I am.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,580
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texan
$201 Billion is not inconsequential, but only about six or seven percent of what congress plans to take in taxes next year.
|
plans get disrupted when banks fall down
__________________
hi
|
|
|
11 Apr 2008, 22:46
|
#13
|
I see you!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In any girl
Posts: 2,825
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by dda
Does it make any sense to any of you that a protest of a sporting event would in some way effect China's policy re Tibet?
|
The Olympics are thought (use the word 'thought' here because I don't know if it actually does) to give the hosting country a large economic boost because of tourism.
But I doubt China will give a shit anyway...
|
|
|
12 Apr 2008, 06:26
|
#14
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nadar
The Olympics are thought (use the word 'thought' here because I don't know if it actually does) to give the hosting country a large economic boost because of tourism.
|
It was my understanding that the greatest benefits actually arose from all the additional (usually public funded) expenditure on large infrastructure projects, particularly transportation and distribution networks (from airport and city-wide mass trasit systems etc), amongst other things. The building of stadia also helps with jobs and the like as well, but they have a smaller multiplier.
Tourism is just torted as an excuse to justify the government not spending that (usually very large) amount of money in a non-olympic year/s. Plus, revenue from tourist consumption taxes help "pay" for it as well, which is handy but reletively inconsequential iirc.
I think the Australian Bureau of Statistics had some modelling done on the 2000 Sydney Olympics done (cant remember whether it was pre or post games though).
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
12 Apr 2008, 15:30
|
#15
|
I ♡ ☠
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 834
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7343975.stm
The BBC's Quentin Sommerville in Beijing says China had been hoping for an impressive roll call of world leaders at the opening ceremony on 8 August for "the greatest show on earth".
But UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown and German Chancellor Angela Merkel have said they will not go, French President Nicolas Sarkozy is undecided and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon says he may not make it.
|
I didn't realise Brown and Merkel weren't attending the opening ceremony. Impressive, for politicians.
|
|
|
12 Apr 2008, 18:53
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,347
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hebdomad
I didn't realise Brown and Merkel weren't attending the opening ceremony. Impressive, for politicians.
|
I don't wish to sound cynical,* but I'd imagine the reasons for non-attendence may not be steeped in morals to quite the extent you seem to imply.
*actually, I do
__________________
The 20th century has been characterised by three developments of great political importance. The growth of democracy; the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy.
|
|
|
12 Apr 2008, 19:19
|
#17
|
I am.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,580
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hebdomad
I didn't realise Brown and Merkel weren't attending the opening ceremony. Impressive, for politicians.
|
Brown isn't boycotting if that's what you are implying.
The plan was always for Tessa Jowell to go to the opening and Brown the closing (since we get it next the closing is more important).
Recently Brown announced this as though it was some sort of moral coup.
__________________
hi
|
|
|
12 Apr 2008, 19:44
|
#18
|
I ♡ ☠
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 834
|
Re: Tibet and the Olympics
Quote:
Originally Posted by All Systems Go
I don't wish to sound cynical,* but I'd imagine the reasons for non-attendence may not be steeped in morals to quite the extent you seem to imply.
*actually, I do
|
I looked up Merkel's current electral support, and it's not too dissimilar from Brown's, so okay. I can but hope.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:26.
| |