Planetarion Forums - Ascendancy ‘giving something back’

Zotnam · 12 Jul 2008, 01:39

Do go on, 3 ally ptarget us more its funny when you still cap **** all. Hopefully past 250 incoming fleets tonight. #4 placed ally is serious business man, you gotta hit those hard!

Linkie · 12 Jul 2008, 01:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

Usually I'd make a joke at this point but he'd probably just go emo and delete so I won't.

Oh wait too late lolz!

That was dec. I just stick to going emo.

Makhil · 12 Jul 2008, 04:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk

If you don't give a shit, don't vote. Simple.

on the contrary, it would have been more interesting to see who's really caring about what asc is doing or planning to do. I don't think they deserve any more attention than any other alliance in top10, and the way they're trying to present themselves as kingmakers looks just like a prepared excuse in case they don't win the round.

Aedolaws · 12 Jul 2008, 05:54

ASS - Who do you want us to attack, Iraq or Afghanistan?

(I vote for Iran)

Nestorn · 12 Jul 2008, 08:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zotnam

Do go on, 3 ally ptarget us more its funny when you still cap **** all. Hopefully past 250 incoming fleets tonight. #4 placed ally is serious business man, you gotta hit those hard!

Out of curiousity, last round, asc were like nr 6 with 10k more roids than anyone else. Something along that road atleast. Who did win that round? Not saying this round is last round, but who did win last round?

Nestorn · 12 Jul 2008, 08:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kargool

Oh and Nestorn, please refer from writing anymore on AD or I will have to break into your house and steal your keyboard.

Behave now

I havent dissed a single asc member, and nor would i

Zotnam · 12 Jul 2008, 08:44

roids didn't win last round, xp from good escorting and active medium planets did... and no, you can't compare the situation at all (we had several days of huge inc last round too, its not like we were sitting on roids unchallanged + def was awesome with all ziks

). If you want to hit the most roid fat ally, we haven't been it for 3 days or more...

Munkee · 12 Jul 2008, 09:28

sigh i got it all wrong

Mzyxptlk · 12 Jul 2008, 11:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Makhil

on the contrary, it would have been more interesting to see who's really caring about what asc is doing or planning to do. I don't think they deserve any more attention than any other alliance in top10, and the way they're trying to present themselves as kingmakers looks just like a prepared excuse in case they don't win the round.

And yet there's a 3 page topic about Ascendancy. Again.

If you want to know how many people care about us, make a poll of your own. Not that you'll get straight answers, but hey!

DrunkenViking · 12 Jul 2008, 12:27

lol. Allies team up and crash on asc planets effectively donating asc up the ranks. Think this was how it started last round. Keep it up guys, GOGOGO

.Disc. · 12 Jul 2008, 19:20

hehe DrunkenViking, I saw an Asecdancy planets defence today, and it wasn't Asc capping thats for sure, fooled by fake Zik DE, and ended up with lots of Recluse and Defender being stolen, over 150k if i remember rightly, not saying it was Asc defending, but was an Asc members base.

On the other note, keep up the good work on livening up the game, like your ideas, personally id just get F-Crew/Orbit to wave Ronin while you get free roids at the other 74 planets.

gl with the round \o/

Steve_G · 12 Jul 2008, 19:24

im still under the impression this is all a ploy for lure attention away from asc, tho i think its having the reverse effect

DrunkenViking · 12 Jul 2008, 23:36

Ye, making a thread named "Ascendancy(!!) 'giving something back'" in order to piss off the 2 single strongest allies, by forcing them into something they do not want, surely is an attempt to lure attention away from asc... Congratulations sir

[DDK]gm · 13 Jul 2008, 00:53

the attack on asc was set up before this thread was created so it wasnt forcing anyone into doing what they didnt want

Kargool · 13 Jul 2008, 09:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by [DDK]gm

the attack on asc was set up before this thread was created so it wasnt forcing anyone into doing what they didnt want

Prove it!

Mzyxptlk · 13 Jul 2008, 10:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by [DDK]gm

the attack on asc was set up before this thread was created so it wasnt forcing anyone into doing what they didnt want

Chimpie was talking about teaming up with Ascendancy, not teaming up against Ascendancy.

No one doesn't want to team up against us.

DrunkenViking · 13 Jul 2008, 10:13

True, isnt "bashing ascendancy" the new olympic sport?

Gary · 13 Jul 2008, 10:28

If you dont want to be attacked, then dont provoke the community by starting threads like this one.

JAT.

Munkee · 13 Jul 2008, 10:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kargool

Prove it!

Well.. considering this thread was produced at half 7 in the evening i'd say there was a good chance any plans to hit asc were already being worked on by that time for night raids. End of the day tho, who gives a **** about proof , it happened and asc aint winning shit so job done.

DrunkenViking · 13 Jul 2008, 11:16

GJN, you missed the fact that we dont mind being hit... If we did mind then we'd sit back incognito trying to dodge the radar, wouldnt we?

On a sidenote; hows things mate?

Zh|l · 13 Jul 2008, 14:35

This thread tickles me amused on so many levels.

It is endorsed by myself and I hope Ascendancy makes whoever wins this poll, Feel the [Fury]

Gary · 13 Jul 2008, 15:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

GJN, you missed the fact that we dont mind being hit... If we did mind then we'd sit back incognito trying to dodge the radar, wouldnt we?

On a sidenote; hows things mate?

If you dont mind being hit, why ironically ask if Asc bashing is a new olympic sport?

All's well with me, thanks Chimpie

CBA · 13 Jul 2008, 16:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

GJN, you missed the fact that we dont mind being hit... If we did mind then we'd sit back incognito trying to dodge the radar, wouldnt we?

On a sidenote; hows things mate?

what are you on about Chimpie? "we dont mind being hit", you talking about YOU?? as i know for a fact YOU do mind being hit and "we" as in alliance, as in "ascendancy" as a unit care massively about being hit!!!!, always in pms, always arranging the fence, always online at 'peak' times. Ascendancy cares more about this game seemingly, then any other alliance so do me a favour, dont talk sh*t on these boards, save that for #ascendancy on ng please, we dont need to read your nonsense

DrunkenViking · 13 Jul 2008, 16:38

GJN, that was just an observation stated in a none-whining way

Also, LOL @ CBA

More clueless than ever?

Munkee · 13 Jul 2008, 16:59

have to say, to most outsiders of asc they do appear to care more about pa than your average player. In a sort of sad die hard way... im glad they won a recent round shows they arent complete losers.

DrunkenViking · 13 Jul 2008, 17:08

Ofc we care about PA. If not we wouldnt play, would we? We dont mind being hit and losing roid as much tho. If we did, wouldnt we tone down a bit?

Game^ · 13 Jul 2008, 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munkee

Well.. considering this thread was produced at half 7 in the evening i'd say there was a good chance any plans to hit asc were already being worked on by that time for night raids. End of the day tho, who gives a **** about proof , it happened and asc aint winning shit so job done.

Well actually, the thread was made in a response to alliances not wanting to give us a chance to win, and possibly help themselves at the same time.

But hey-ho your alliance certainly will not be winning this round either, so truely outstanding political play there.

Mzyxptlk · 13 Jul 2008, 20:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munkee

have to say, to most outsiders of asc they do appear to care more about pa than your average player. In a sort of sad die hard way... im glad they won a recent round shows they arent complete losers.

It makes no sense whatsoever to talk about Ascendancy as a unit, at least not in this respect.

Ronin · 28 Jul 2008, 23:23

hey!, you guys forgot to hit ND!

VenoX · 28 Jul 2008, 23:41

It was just a distraction!

horn · 31 Jul 2008, 13:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Makhil

on the contrary, it would have been more interesting to see who's really caring about what asc is doing or planning to do.

well it helps that they're actually willing to discuss what they're planning on doing. people might be more inclined to discuss other alliances if they offered up similar opportunities to discuss them. it might also help if the boards didn't consist of 50% asc posters because other alliances are too scared to let their members talk here.

horn · 31 Jul 2008, 13:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk

It makes no sense whatsoever to talk about Ascendancy as a unit, at least not in this respect.

no one cares.

Mzyxptlk · 31 Jul 2008, 14:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by horn

no one cares.

Nevertheless.

horn · 31 Jul 2008, 14:50

see that. what looks like a pro ascendancy post, and then one that seems anti ascendancy..... interesting... this guy sure seems like a maverick. better look out for him.

Mistwraith · 2 Aug 2008, 08:10

So now all the fuss is over, would ascendancy like to make a comment on how this tactic affected them ?
Wether it turned out as a great plan or even a great PR stunt?
Did it bite you all on the *bleep* ?

lokken · 2 Aug 2008, 09:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mistwraith

So now all the fuss is over, would ascendancy like to make a comment on how this tactic affected them ?
Wether it turned out as a great plan or even a great PR stunt?
Did it bite you all on the *bleep* ?

I'd call it an irrelevance.

If Ascendancy put in enough effort for a sufficient amount of time, we win planetarion. We didn't have the latter this time. Easy as that really.

Some might call that arrogance, I think it's more confidence in the players we have.

jerome · 2 Aug 2008, 09:08

no, lokken is speaking bollocks. we played shit and we lost. we consistently crashed, we had a ridiculous amount of internal squabbles where idiots leaving tag cost us a shitload of score (2 t5 planets at the time of departure and another t100 or so)

so yes, if we put in more "effort" and didn't suck ass as people, players and an alliance, we would have won. but then what alliance wouldn't have?

lokken · 2 Aug 2008, 09:21

Fair enough. You played more than me.

Cooling · 2 Aug 2008, 09:46

This tactic was an unmitigated disaster and I unreservedly condemn all our HC's for coming up with such a shit idea.