View Single Post
Unread 25 Jan 2007, 07:28   #97
Bugsby
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 17
Bugsby is just really niceBugsby is just really niceBugsby is just really niceBugsby is just really niceBugsby is just really nice
Re: OK GD people, which book are you reading now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
I was actually just making the joke that my mum wasn't in fact fat (because she is see so it's like irony but not however she's actually not and I just made it all up for the joke). Largely I'd hold that the actual confusion in this issue arises from linguistic differences, ie we don't actually define what we mean by "know". This happens a lot though so it's not really too big a deal. After all an empty box is rarely empty!
OH. I thought you said Nodrog didn't know about epistemology, when he was clearly framing a good Gettier case. Stupid terse forum posts.

And yes, we still don't have a good solution to what we mean by "knowledge," ever since Edmund Gettier ruined Justified True Belief for us. But that's what analytic philosophy is all about - making problems for itself that it can't solve.
Bugsby is offline   Reply With Quote