Quote:
Originally posted by Obfuscator
If the only justification the creators have is clause 7, you have already lost the argument.
|
Clause 7 is the most important clause it seems here. Though each side is arguing over the same matter, each approached this question differently. One side approached it as a "precendence in unenforcement" or a "right" to be removed only with subsantial evidence. The other side is arguing that PA has the right to do what it damn well wishes with Clause 7.
Why use Clause 7? it is important because of these circumstances. 1) Planetarion is a private company, the policies it sets, as long as they are not against any law can and will be upheld in court. 2) Planetarion has choosen that "cheating" is wrong, and if not specifically stated previously, its value choice in this fits under Clause 7 and can and will take action to support its choice using Clause 7. 3) Clause 7 may seem to be fairly vague and is not very "deontologically" oriented, but once again we are dealing with a private corporation. Private companies, unlike say the GOVERNMENT, get more freedoms and you are not given much civil liberties with a private corporation as say a government. 4) These arguement as well thought out as it is, will still not help the individual. This matter needs to be discussed with PA Crew, all this allows is for us to voice our opinions. I for one don't give a care what happened. I just can't resist trolling these boards.