Thread: travler
View Single Post
Unread 12 Apr 2006, 09:18   #120
MrL_JaKiri
The Twilight of the Gods
 
MrL_JaKiri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.MrL_JaKiri has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: travler

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travler
Yes you could put it there but not if your playing dominos.
Dominos has a logical structure, much like the universe has physical rules.

You've also ignored the dichotomy between "creation" and "conscious creation". A watch was created with the goal of creating a watch; your average rock was created by merely the application of physical laws, and noone really cares if it exists or not. Why can't you just as easily say, using your "logic", that a rock was created by mere application of unthinking forces, therefore there was no active thought of creation involved at the start of the universe?

Thank you for at last replying to one of my posts, although I suspect that was because it was the first one you could (easily) completely ignore the point of when making a half-arsed reply.

To be fair that kind of Logical Fallacy is only fallacious if you accept that their point 1 is invalid; for example, given the insane amount of evidence for evolution, which can be brought to hand pretty easily, people denying that it can take place or does take place must be either lazy or stupid.
MrL_JaKiri is offline