Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

rain · 14 Oct 2006, 23:29

New round, rules getting improved. The period before a new planet can be exiled increased from 24 ticks to 48 ticks. No comment. But how frustrating can be to have a spy in gal, one who gives away gal status/gal activity to his alliance? One who laughs in your face, cause there´s nothing you can do to stop him from doing it? Especially now when he can stay for 2 days, not one.
In the past i spent hours on #support explaining to admins this situation. And this is quite an important issue, a lot of attacks are made in the begining of the round using this tactic. You can even call it cheating, when no one has jgp scan, some do get it at no cost and no research. Solving this is quite easy, just allow GC and ministers to block any planet in gal that they want to block from seeing gal status. Easy to implement really and will remove a lot of posible GC head aches. More, I can´t see any reason not to implement this, keeping the things the way they are atm will only encourage cheating and/or dirty playing.

14 Oct 2006, 23:29	#1
rain Registered User Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 127	How frustrating is this New round, rules getting improved. The period before a new planet can be exiled increased from 24 ticks to 48 ticks. No comment. But how frustrating can be to have a spy in gal, one who gives away gal status/gal activity to his alliance? One who laughs in your face, cause there´s nothing you can do to stop him from doing it? Especially now when he can stay for 2 days, not one. In the past i spent hours on #support explaining to admins this situation. And this is quite an important issue, a lot of attacks are made in the begining of the round using this tactic. You can even call it cheating, when no one has jgp scan, some do get it at no cost and no research. Solving this is quite easy, just allow GC and ministers to block any planet in gal that they want to block from seeing gal status. Easy to implement really and will remove a lot of posible GC head aches. More, I can´t see any reason not to implement this, keeping the things the way they are atm will only encourage cheating and/or dirty playing. __________________ on the bench