Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
I quite liked how the gloating and arrogance subsided so suddenly in terms of your attitude to your gal mates and the rest of PA. Its quite apt that Asc should get screwed over for top planet by their "friends" who they probably even helped point towards the target in the first place, ofc now that it failed you won't be taking responsibility for this.
|
Don't be retarded, elviz was ahead by about 1 mil score before this happened.
I'd like to quote from pateam themselves on this topic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fiery
3) Farming
- Ship "suiciding" will cause the beneficiary planet to be adjusted to the state it was in before the suicidal attack. An attack will be deemed a suicide if there is no realistic chance at the time of launch to gain anything, whether ships, score or experience, from landing the attack. These will be judged on a case by case basis, and human error will be taken into account, but unless sufficient reason is given, the suiciding planet will be closed.
|
Now the decision taken by the multihunters here is that there was a realistic chance at the time of launch that the attackers could gain something from this. Fair enough 40 mil value was launched and if eksero got no defence the wave could have landed (I'm pretty much paraphrasing fiery here).
Reasonably speaking then I (or perhaps it'd need to be someone not in ascendancy) could organise 4/5 waves on elviz which as long as they maxcapped would be allowed to land and end up donating him shitloads of salvage because the attackers just didn't "happen to" or "feel like" pulling. Now, what exactly is to stop me doing this? Can I ask the bottom 40 members of the ascendancy tag to leave and we all attack elviz, he ends up gaining 3 mil value in salvage and that's actually acceptable? I mean
if that rule doesn't apply in this case what ****ing scenario does it actually apply in?