Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
The phrase 'sex offender' is completely meaningless, please dont encourage this sort of tabloid driven nonsense which puts child rapists in the same category as someone who downloads photos of 16 year old girls.
Anyone who judges a 'criminal' based on the name of the broad name of crime rather than the specific details of their case is an idiot who is part of the problem.
|
Are you saying then, that you'd want to know the details of the offence before deciding whether you'd want to help an individual?
'Sex offender' is as good as term as any for someone who, when released from prison, is obliged to sign the register.
It mentions in the articles that such people are determined to be in 1 of 3 categories, with categories 2 and 3 (where 1 is for people deemed least likely to re-offend) being those for who such 'circles' are deemed appropriate.
Happier now?