View Single Post
Unread 22 Jul 2008, 22:39   #13
Aedolaws
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 158
Aedolaws is on a distinguished road
Re: Alliance Flags, (New) Battlegroups, and in-game politics system

How would alliances be stagnated? The system would be just as it is now, but without the BGs and C class. It basically means that big teams can only attack big teams. But even alliances would benefit, as many players will now have yet another incentive to participate in the alliance raids. Alliances themselves would benefit from making it a true team struggle.

I said nothing about galaxies, except giving something for the Ministers to do. Again, bringing the game out of the current alliance-only routine.

Anyone can play however they want, whenever they want. (just like now, but with the difference that different ranking would be kept.)

I don't see anything wrong with keeping freebies in class C. If they want more, they can pay.

I don't know how much clearer and concise can I be. Now, if you all believe that it is ok to keep the current/traditional everyone hits everyone, hell, go for it.

Last edited by Aedolaws; 22 Jul 2008 at 22:45.
Aedolaws is offline   Reply With Quote