View Single Post
Unread 20 Jun 2005, 02:24   #26
Tomkat
:alpha:
 
Tomkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 7,871
Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Tomkat has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: World Leaders That Don't Suck

What about the Dalai Lama (sp?) ?

The thing is, the media loves negative stories. So we hear all about the awful things that world leaders have supposedly done. Does this mean that if we DON'T hear about them, they're doing a pretty good job?

I know nothing about Japanese politics. Or Australian. I couldn't name any Scandinavian world leaders. Or South American. Does this mean they're shit, or just that they're not doing anything that's so bad that it's worth writing about?
__________________
"There is no I in team, but there are two in anal fisting"
Tomkat is offline   Reply With Quote