View Single Post
Unread 11 Nov 2005, 14:05   #8
Marilyn Manson
Gone
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,656
Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Marilyn Manson has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Exclamation Re: So if you had to choose...

Davis is simply of the mould of recent leaders - I.E, what we need is more of the same. No real reform of image of policies. He is completely unsuited to be leader. He is IDS Mk II.

We know almost nothing about Cameron politically, other than he has supported in the past some fairly offbeat schemes, such as a flat tax. He also supported the Iraq war, is highly neo-con in his inclinations, although is 'reformist' on some things, such as drugs laws. There isn't really that much to suggest that he's a genuine moderniser or a reformer other than his own say so during the campaign, although he obviously has a better grasp of what needs to be done, at least in image terms, than Davis does.

Cameron has simply said what others have been saying for years; the difference is that this time it looks partially credible, although it remains to be seen if he wants to put any flesh on the bones of it. Almost everyone else in the party - Davis included - in the past few years have talked about reform extensively but done precisely nothing about it. It's not really anything new in that sense - the only difference is that Cameron has been so polished, people have started standing up and listening.

It'll be interesting - or at least, entertaining - regardless of which of them win, because both are quite divisive figures, and there will be a lot bitching in the party as a result.

Last edited by Marilyn Manson; 11 Nov 2005 at 14:23.
Marilyn Manson is offline   Reply With Quote