Quote:
Originally Posted by Light
I dont agree with your point about fenced BP's having loyalty to there BP instead of the alliance. Im sure there are afew of these galaxys around (1:2?) but i'd argue that the majority of fenced BP's do it to avoid incomings but still maintain the loyalty to whichever alliance they're in.
|
Heh, not quite sure why your picking out my gal as a target for selfish players - I've been in ND for about 8 rounds now and have been invited by pretty much any ally thats ever been worth playing for. I've been in a position to win numerous rounds on a planet level and when it comes down to it my alliance has been unable to support my push for first - yet i'm still in ND and wouldnt be anywhere else. That sort of loyalty to a second tier alliance is pretty rare these days and i'm pretty annoyed that im being victimised for that loyalty - if you think im some sort of flagship that leeches def all round then your sorely mistaken! I stay with ND because I love the community - I recall you seem to swap allies nearly every round Light! An alliance like ND simply cant handle fortresses, you'll take note that the only two gals with more than 5 ND are down in the echelons of rank 70+.
In response to JBG - Dont go around demonising people style of play as uncaring simply because its different to your own, I personally found my experience in Asc to be the most egotistical and self-consumed alliance that I have been in which I am sure can be conversely described as 'democratic'. It is of my alliances benefit for me to have a strong planet and invest as little time and resources as possible in defending that asset.