View Single Post
Unread 24 May 2017, 14:21   #6
VenoX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
VenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant futureVenoX has a brilliant future
Re: Does Gal Raiding Exist post tick 500

Over the 9 day period we were gal raiding before we started hitting Ultores again the number of Kittenz in our raids were:

0 kittenz
1 kittenz
3 kittenz
3 kittenz
0 kittenz
3 kittenz
0 kittenz
6 kittenz
0 kittenz

Each of these raids had between 12-18 targets.

At the same time, Kittenz were giving us very similar incomings, regularly hitting our gals with 3-4 CT in them. We did not believe they were deliberately targetting CT because we both had a fairly reasonable amount of ally relations (limiting target choice) and none with each other.

What gm and myself did object to was you (CBA) telling Kittenz that we were deliberately targetting them (confirmed by gm speaking with Demort) which they believed as you were sat in our block channel trying to play your little sneaky political game. Which resulted in Kittenz p-targetting CT for 3 days straight. Faceless were allied to CT during the time CBA was directing other allies to hit us.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
VenoX is offline   Reply With Quote