Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLobster
Which is better for the game?
1) 30 alliance of 50
2) 16 alliances of 90
|
This question isn't really applicable atm because we just don't seem to have enough active DCs/BCs/HCs to competently run more alliances. Where will they come from!?
In r25 there were about 14 alliances I know are worth the name, this round there are about 16. The difference is that in r14, more of the allies were at membercap (~11 compared to ~3), but still, there were only 4 allies that were ever going to finish top 4...
The other difference is that those 'competent' alliances had a total of 790 members by round end in r25. This time around there's about 990.
The smaller memberlimit round had fewer alliances, fewer people in alliances, but more alliances at membercap.
People thought this was the last round which skews it a bit, but look through the history and I can't see much change.
Something that is a little tempting is 30-40 member tags, in which case you'd have to accept that top alliances would just have several tags. Is this better than what we have at the moment? It might be interesting.