View Single Post
Unread 9 Apr 2008, 11:55   #13
Gate
;D!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
Gate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like himGate is an inspiration to us all and we should try to be more like him
Re: Summary of currently suggested improvements for round 27

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kargool
I am against the scans for xan cloaked ships. Complaining about xan cloaked ships is just about as stupid as...
Changing the scan tree to the OP's system would lead to an extra benefit to xands.

Current system:
- players who don't have access to scans can't hit anything.
- Players who are in an alliance can hit anything, but there's a ~60 tick period at the beginning where they can't hit xands due to lack of AUs *

New system WHILST MAINTAINING CLOAKING:
- players who don't have access to scans can hit anything that's not xan
- players who're in an alliance now get 60 extra ticks of hitting xands.

All races except xan are likely to receive more incoming. Relative to other races, xands have gained an advantage at a tiny cost. Hence why I currently think cloaked ships should appear on units under this system.




* although our cath CO hit xands from PT72 this round, and S/T scans let CR/BS rushers hit xands.
__________________
[ND]
Kicked from Ascendancy
Proud to have been a Dark Lord Rising.
Gate is offline   Reply With Quote