[Recluse]

Originally Posted by [B5]Londo

You lot seem to have lost the plot...
booji was originally arguing for more careful and concise terms for agreements, I presume you think you are arguing against him but you actually demonstrate exactly why it is necessary.
Suffice to say if you had a NAP based on landing times, a no escorting clause would be included, and it certainly wouldnt be forgotten as you two show by both coming to the same conclusion... although well behind me since I included the objection in my first post on this NAP terms section off this thread

But...why? I mean why would such legalese be needed, when, by definition, a NAP is a Non Aggression Pack. Agression, by definition, is a hostile or violent behavior, and by definition hostile is unfriendly or antagonistic. To me, the terms are in the name itself. We shouldn't have to bring harvard educated lawyers in just to tell someone not to piss on the other team until the tick agreed upon. :/