View Single Post
Unread 12 Dec 2010, 12:48   #52
[B5]Londo
Paso Leaute
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of
Re: Congratulations Apprime, HaSu and 7:6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebird View Post
Trusted please eablorate on what we actually did that was untrustworthy?? Broke a NAP with ASC and told them that we wanted to stay neutral towards them which we would have so that we could fight our war with ND/CT so please tell me what did we do that was so untrustworthy ?
Wait a min here! Ended a Non Aggression Pact to say you wanted to be neutral? If you end a non aggression pact you are automatically saying you intend to be aggressive, a NAP is actually a guarantee of neutrality.

PA tends to take it as something partisan but it shouldnt be; our NAP with Imperia had not, at the time it was broken, lead to any unified hostile actions against Apprime so was actually operating as it should, a guarantee of neutrality between our two allies.

However in the triangular politics that there was the idea that any two would be neutral vis a vis each other is inherently worrying to the other, so as long as you had a NAP with us App couldnt stand for it, but equally the idea that you could maintain neutrality with us while in Apps good graces is laughable, all you are saying is you hoped for some utopian stability (read stagnation) between the top three that would avoid your fighting either, so basically stagnation was your one and only political goal.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
[B5]Londo is offline   Reply With Quote