Interesting. Lets examine what happened here:
- I say I'm in favour of something which laid to a disgrace
- you say that WW1 was the biggest disgrace in our history
- I point out a bigger disgrace
- Therefore I am also infavour of that said bigger disgrace because I am infavour of something which laid the lesser disgrace.
I just posted
this link elsewhere - but you might as well read it too. Might teach you something about logic. Because I think an army is vital, doesn't mean I support the idiots' decisions who use the army.
And yes, though WW1 was a fairly big disgrace, I still think we desperately needed an army pre-1914...!