Thread: Regarding Sk´s
View Single Post
Unread 23 Jun 2009, 14:29   #5
ArcChas
General (Adjective Army)
 
ArcChas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
ArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud of
Re: Regarding Sk´s

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricoshay View Post
Stop your whining. SKs in the main attack fleets will just add a bit more difficulty to the big planets staying on top. Isn't that what we really need? Or do we want another boring round?
Posting on PD does not (always) equate to "whining". Just because you disagree is no reason to play the "whining card". Although, on this occasion I agree with your general opinion of these proposals - they're far too complex and are trying to address a problem which doesn't exist (and hopefully never will exist).

However, I disagree with your assessment of the people who would be affected by introducing SKs into the main attack fleets. The only people who would stand any chance of keeping their structures would be the (very) big planets.
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
ArcChas is offline   Reply With Quote