Thread: Ascrime
View Single Post
Unread 25 Jul 2009, 18:40   #32
MiX
Who cares?
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 248
MiX has a spectacular aura aboutMiX has a spectacular aura aboutMiX has a spectacular aura about
Re: Ascrime

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zotnam View Post
Yeah man, totally makes sense to put 0 waves on 900 roid apprime targets, but on the 1200 asc ones lets make 4 big waves! This is in the same galaxy. CT etc said themselfs the block broke up too early, but instead of even trying to hit apprime without our "irrelevant" alliance, they go straight back to gal raiding. And yes, if they had any sense, they would keep hitting apprime, it's quite clear they are focused alot more on attacking now, therefor lacking in defense. I don't think anyonein asc expected to be left alone, then we would just have stayed in the block.. I am not surprised at this behaviour though, it was the same story when they had a hard target to hit in the block..

There's pretty much only 1 gal with a good amount of both apprime and asc, I think we all know which gal that is Roidwise, we are very top heavy so the average is a pretty poor indicater.
Well that pretty much only 1 gal happens to be the one which lost the roids, for asc as well as for Apprime. So nothing going bad there right?

And of course if such a gal is set up for TP people will prefer the roidfat asc targets over the skinny apprimes, especially when they know from previous attempts those apprimes have solid defence. Nothing wrong with that behavior.

Also top heavy means the planet in gals like this one are relatively even more fat.

Of course if CT etc would be purposely picking out asc targets over apprimes it would be a bad thing, but I dont see that happening atm. Thats all I am trying to show in my posts in this thread. I have no comment on the gal raiding behavior of CT as I simply dont know enough about that. Im just applying logic to understand ascs roidloss.
MiX is offline   Reply With Quote