View Single Post
Unread 15 Nov 2017, 17:37   #30
[DDK]gm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future[DDK]gm has a brilliant future
Re: Cheaters always seem to prosper

Lol, i will just point out this as an example for you hunter. While if you read it as is, it doesn't make any sense, if you read it wrong as the player intends then it does. I'm guessing it was ace on duty!

Subject: offensive fleet name? Posted Mon Nov 13 02:10:10 2017 Status: Completed
You asked

3:4:4 (Etd) big nick digger

Support replied
That's not an offensive name, if you read it wrong you might think it is.
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
[DDK]gm is offline   Reply With Quote