Quote:
Originally Posted by Killeah
Thing is that wasnīt the first time it was done this round by xVx, ofc. it wasnīt a big fuss when it happened first time, since some take such actions with a shrug instead of whining
That said - Iīm pretty sure CT ainīt the only ally ignoring naps from xVx next round.
Also - when you act the same way twice on seperate incidents it certainly looks like a bad habit, and not a bold move - we shall see....
|
How an alliance acts round to round is not something that affects naps - alliances will always nap who they need to to get as high as possible.
Look at ND and App - at war for large parts of this round, napped for most of last round, at war the round before that.
Its all about what suits your needs at the time not past actions of an alliance....
and anyway only reason CT ended the nap was to jump on the xVx raping bandwagon, what was xVx supposed to do? just sit and wait for it? they are already outgunned as it is... if anything it was just shrewd tactics and i reckon most alliances would have done the same in there situation.
The fact still remains though that CT have ended the nap a week to late and have ended up looking crap for it - ND should now pass them if they dont crash more fleets (wishful thinking
)