Quote:
Originally Posted by Prover
I think this inference is backwards. Logic is fundamental to what...nature? How do you figure? How much do we really understand about nature to say in all "correction"? I argue that language is more-so fundamental with respect to human nature for constructing meaning. Humans know more about humans than they know about nature. Do you not agree? I argue further...
|
Logic always be correct internally man, de only ting dat can make logic wrong is if u put da wrong values in, ya feel me?
Quote:
|
So a rock is what it is: a rock. To a petrologist, a rock is a form of igneous sediment crystallized granite mineral heat ashes energized molecules strong chemical bonds atoms etc. Break up a rock, and reduce its meaning. Less information has more meaning. This suggests there is no intrinsic meaning in material things. Since when you lose a sense of order, you also lose a sense of meaning. I explain more below.
|
Nah man, when you break up a rock you still got all dose tings (an by de way, i don't tink any wun rock 'as all dose tings), you just got em a bit more spread out like. Also how you reckon a lotta pebbles is less information dan wun big rock? tcch
Quote:
|
Do you think everything is pointless? To say so is incomplete and inaccurate. We might not see an ultimate point, but we do see a distribution of points (on a wave function) that become more ordered in time (in their destination). This "plot" we see is based on the concept of entropy in statistical mechanics. Where a loss of information comes from a loss of randomness, and so the maximum entropy is assumed for the most probable explanation of a physical system (Boltzmann).
|
Who be sayin' everyting is pointless man? You can construct your own meanings from da shit you be findin' all around you. Dat's all dere is man, billions o' little meanings dat all dese people 'ave made. No-one be sayin' shit is pointless, and even if it were, we wouldn't 'ave no way o' knowin'.
Quote:
|
It's also what I mean by the probabilistic nature of the universe. To be more correct, it's the probabilistic nature of humans looking at the universe. Time is chance, so I infer '4D'-thinking. God might not play dice with the universe, but it seems the universe is playing dice with God.
|
Dis don't even make no sense internally man, if dis be an argument you be missing out about 5 steps in between each statement. You got a ladder with only a fifth of da rungs? How a nigga gonna climb dat shit? Tcch
note: "Tcch" is that sound that black people make with their teeth.