Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Getting up at night to launch defence is silly, and your solution is 'to not get up at night' ? I didn't even need to get intel that you're in Norse, because I'm probably right. Your opinion on this matter is biased to the core because your alliance doesn't defend at all and rather likes to trollwave/escort for planet win, and scrapping Alliance-Fleets will make this so much easier for you guys.
The Alliance-Fleet implementation helps the less active tags play a bit more competitively if they are organised enough. If they scrap Alliance-Fleets, then it'll go back to the more active tags dominating again. And no, my opinion isn't biased because my alliance will still have good defence even if they remove alliance-fleets.
Let's remove AFs so alliances like Norse can lolwave the less active tags where they have no chance to cover. Let's make it easier for you and more difficult for the less active tags. Great suggestion.
|
We tried to escort for planet win 4 rounds ago. This shitty round none of us cared. Last round there was some escort fleets sent, still less than in bf ult or any of the other allies. So get your facts right.. And how has it helped the less active tags? Made the game even more boring to play. The opinion in norse is pro allydef.. Mine is not. With allydef we can actually Def since we have some working nightshift and a few from non Eu timezones.
I'm against it cause it makes Def planets even more useful,because it's not yourself sending the fleet, because it benefits bigger tags (value and numbers) because it makes it harder for the smaller tags to fight back without lol waving and gangbanging. The less active needs more organization, more organization needs more activity... So you just picked your own defense of the ally fleet apart. Good job!!
And when have Norse ever lolwaved the less active tags?
From where does this notion that we don't defend come from?