Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Phang
What
|
It's a paradox, by being able to save 'all' you can save none.
It would mean you would be morally obligated to save all within your best effort and knowing you can save all for 1$ each would mean you would be morally obligated to raise as much money as you can.
However, have you saved everyone when you save all?
I do not think so. I think this is a paradoxical question that cannot be solved, the problem would be more interesting if you think if such a gift would be a blessing or a burning, to be honest, I think it would matters unnecessarily complicated.
Theam