View Single Post
Unread 25 Oct 2005, 15:01   #16
Kjeldoran
Angels for life !
 
Kjeldoran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
Kjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond reputeKjeldoran has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any good reasons not to make alliance tags and/or value public?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kargool
I agree with Gate, tags will only intimidate the smaller alliances from attacking galaxies, and will also result into more bashing of unallied planets and smaller alliances.
Tbh, you can only be intimidated if you LET them intimidate you. Pple don't care if a planet is allied or not, they care if it gathers defence or not.
Being allianceless or in a smaller alliance doesn't always mean'll be less covered. Also, most top alliances have planned attacks and expect their members to attack from the options they give their members.

The enemy is more likely to be bashed then some smaller alliance.

If Orbit attacks a gal with 4 1up'ers in, 1up might not be arsed to do a full hit on Orbit to teach them a lesson. If it was LCH or Newdawn hitting that same galaxy, 1up might think again and decide it is worth the effort. In this example, planet tags would work in the advantage of smaller alliances.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.

FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community

FA Gaming community

No need for a disclaimer ...
Kjeldoran is offline   Reply With Quote