Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

paolo · 5 Mar 2006, 22:56

I think it would be ideal for the top alliance to have a small active core say 50, sub top 75 and the 'lesser' alliances to be able to have more members say 100 or more.

It would be up to pa-crew to judge alliances to be top or sub top or 'lesser'. Since the top and sub top have active enough HC, it will not be any problem to discuss it with them. The lesser alliances (also with quite the active HC 90% of the time) will be given the automatic 100 limit.
Offcourse this will be up for abuse, but pa-crew will notice this fast enough i think. The best penalty would be a split right down the middle into two alliances or even more.

The idea needs to be fine tuned, but the thought is what is important. It would be best to give the top alliances a fixed max and give the training alliances enough room to train everybody.

5 Mar 2006, 22:56	#15
paolo Kwaak Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Netherlands Posts: 296	Re: R17 Alliance limits I think it would be ideal for the top alliance to have a small active core say 50, sub top 75 and the 'lesser' alliances to be able to have more members say 100 or more. It would be up to pa-crew to judge alliances to be top or sub top or 'lesser'. Since the top and sub top have active enough HC, it will not be any problem to discuss it with them. The lesser alliances (also with quite the active HC 90% of the time) will be given the automatic 100 limit. Offcourse this will be up for abuse, but pa-crew will notice this fast enough i think. The best penalty would be a split right down the middle into two alliances or even more. The idea needs to be fine tuned, but the thought is what is important. It would be best to give the top alliances a fixed max and give the training alliances enough room to train everybody.